nah. I like to talk in terms of what matters to the current situation.In post 1142, Performer wrote:"I don't like how sci kinda side-pushes mala and was absent during the recent CT drama. Kinda thinking those are both mislynches rn."
And tictac's 1139 about lynching garm, perf, mala.
So he thought CT & mala were mislynches and that I 'm scum for pushing them. In his 1139 he preferred garm over mala. So he scumreads me, garm, mala.
tictac you are candidate #1 if mala gets lynched and somehow flips town.
mala is the other head on the block so that is what I compared garm to.
On further thought it probs didn't make sense tho, cause there's no way I'm gonna be able to hash this garm-thing out in time for the deadline tho.
I was thinking 'independently null/associative townlean' on mala when I wrote that, but have since reconsidered since ya had me thinking about wagon analysis.
I now think she's town on account of her being a deadline-wagon on a nullposter.
I see ya throwing up reads like it's going out of style, but this is the first time I've seen ya actually attempt to jab at someone, and it's a 'lynch ya tomorrow' type of thing.
None of it means anything, since ya not doing anything with those reads. It's just an attempt at lamist.
That's a really bad signal to noise ratio for a semi-active replacer in my opinion.
@garm: on further thought, I'm tabling the thing on ya. Ya at the very least someone who can argue properly and seems interested in doing so and dave doesn't seem to want input. We need way more time to hash things out, and it's distracting from things that matter to current moment.
Like lynching perfomer and not lynching mala.
