Mini Normal 2030: Day 8

[Mister Rogers]

Oh aha -- I got it -- this is a syntax formatting thing!

Ok, so here let me translate:

Why didn't I make a big deal of your "obvcrumbing" and Sasha's genuine looking crumb?

First of all, you already admitted in thread that those were BS right? And they occurred before I even entered the game right?

But second of all, even if that were true, why would I trust that information to scum in the Q/T?

[profii]

don’t ask me it’s not my opinion that counts

[Light Ethos]

@Mister Rogers: Thank you for breaking it down for me. I crumbed differently as cop in a past game.

It’s a bit weird that someone noticed I was messing about with cop references - which got spotted as I was quite blatant about

You spotted a sash crumb which almost no one spotted

But you didn’t say in the PT -

well one of Sash / prof is lying

This is the bit that confused me.

PEDIT: I see Mister Rogers' interpretation. Was he right in saying that's what you meant?

[profii]

I alluded to being the cop to draw a nk
Rogers spotted a crumb from sash about sash being cop

We can’t both be cops, so why not suggest shoot all liars to Krazy in the PT


Now Rogers is saying he could tell I was messing about


Need to check exactly when I said I was messing because Rogers says my bit happened pre-Rogers entrance to the game - but so did sash crumb so...

[profii]

I just checked what I said

I said I was baiting FL - which was the main point of hinting but I don’t outright say I was messing about

Something ain’t right here

[profii]

Oh damn. Missed a page. Thought I only missed 4 posts.

Have u noticed I said we could cop u a couple of times

I mean, sure. I’m probably the most likely to die, though, unless scum is outright terrified of Krazy.

Krazy/Worst are more mislynchable than me right now, and Rogers is making sure that the claims are discredited.

Right well the point was if I hinted cop I figured you would at least consider the possibility of me fake claiming and if I’m cop you’d probably know I’m copping you n1 every time so we can rule town for the rest of the game

So that’s 1 reason I don’t think you’d fake claim mason


Also it’s making me think Krazy clocked it and wants to kill me in case I cop him

[profii]

Oh aha -- I got it -- this is a syntax formatting thing!

Ok, so here let me translate:

Why didn't I make a big deal of your "obvcrumbing" and Sasha's genuine looking crumb?

First of all, you already admitted in thread that those were BS right? And they occurred before I even entered the game right?

But second of all, even if that were true, why would I trust that information to scum in the Q/T?

Prior to the above post

2100 was where I wanted to bait FL and that was

after

you joined us

[profii]

Scummy twitchy or towny twitchy

It'a my first game outside of a newbie setting. How does a twitchy act?

But this is the 4th post

How is that a cop crumb

[Gamma Emerald]

I see what the crumb was
But the rest of this is leaving me in the dust

[Not_Mafia]

Mister Rogers still needs to be policy lynched

[Gamma Emerald]

Mister Rogers still needs to be policy lynched

For a word plenty of other people use? No thanks

[Mister Rogers]

Scummy twitchy or towny twitchy

It'a my first game outside of a newbie setting. How does a twitchy act?

But this is the 4th post

How is that a cop crumb

Its Sasha's ISO #4.

Just like with FL who "claimed vig" people also "claim cop" as a joke and so I seriously gloss stuff like that over, I mean I have seen these jokes so much, I simply move past them. Besides you're this big reaction test gu, right? I mean it makes sense you would do that too. :shrug:

On the recent convo you quoted, I thought it referenced something previously discussed earlier in thread and I remember how FL "claimed vig" a couple of times so...

[Light Ethos]

Mister Rogers still needs to be policy lynched

Why?

[Not_Mafia]

Mister Rogers still needs to be policy lynched

Why?

He said wagonomics

[Light Ethos]

Did you teach Saudade how to play? It's like he never left.

[Mister Rogers]

POP QUIZ!

So, NM for 100% of your score on this test,

Who are you peeking for us tonight?

[Not_Mafia]

Flavour Leaf

[Mister Rogers]

Dang Gamma, any comments on this?

[Mister Rogers]

I will add a comment which is that my personal choice would be Gamma for peeking. I think everyone wants someone from their own PoE to be peeked. FL isn't on my PoE, so...

[Gamma Emerald]

Dang Gamma, any comments on this?

Given that I was his previous choice it’s strange he’d listen to me that easily

[Mister Rogers]

I consider both FL & Creature chiefly responsible for lynching Crimson and so I don't see how its possible for them to tie themselves together so obviously while bussing their buddy when it wasn't necessary.

[Mister Rogers]

I mean let's talk about scum FL OTT defending Manatee to the point that people couldn't help question his alignment over it. So we are supposed to believe he is doing this as scum when a simple bus would be far more beneficial, easier and without risk? No, the reason was because it was his Mason buddy.

[Mister Rogers]

So there is no reason anyone should be scum reading FL or Creature and therefore no reason to peek them.

[Creature]

lol what?

[Mister Rogers]

NT is also eliminated from the list. Nobody is scum reading her from her performance D1.

Therefore the peek list will be:

(Myself, Gamma, Peformer, Profii, About)

Since we will be lynching from this list, one of those names will be removed. I think its possible to further refine this list by agreement amongst all town members but the peek cannot be outside that list.