Overkill 1: Serenity/Firefly (GAME OVER)

[RadiantCowbells]

this is what my reaction looks like when I don't think I'm at threat of being mislynched.

Bullshit.

push on me then.

[the worst]

this is what my reaction looks like when I don't think I'm at threat of being mislynched.

Bullshit.

probably true
and?

[CheekyTeeky]

this is what my reaction looks like when I don't think I'm at threat of being mislynched.

Bullshit.

push on me then.

No I want you to keep sheeping NSG for reasons. Speaking of sheep...sky is awfully quiet.

[the worst]

Sky is a wolf DW we lynch her eod1

[RadiantCowbells]

Are you saying that you're fine with me being potentially scum as long as I just attach my vote to NSG?

[northsidegal]

do you have reason to believe that skygazer is online right now but not posting or was that just a convenient segue from the word "sheeping"?

[CheekyTeeky]

I keep triggering myself to remember things. No idea if they're online. Just saying.

[RadiantCowbells]

Are you saying that you're fine with me being potentially scum as long as I just attach my vote to NSG?

[CheekyTeeky]

Are you saying that you're fine with me being potentially scum as long as I just attach my vote to NSG?

No? Why would that be your interpretation of what I said when I clearly said "reasons"

How is "reasons" ambiguous to anyone?

[the worst]

oops I was meant to be poking flicker into producing AI content

calling RC a wolf is now invalid

why flicker specifically?

Something between flicker/TW definitely feels weird to me.

i felt the exact same thing.

i think flicker is scum for a very underwhelming opening and a lack of content where i would expect content to be. 63 is essentially RVS at a point beyond when real reads could already have begun to form. she has to be asked specifically about reads by tw before saying anything, and even then i don't think there's much. a lot of the rest of what she's had has been simple straightforward explanations (inherently NAI content wise) or just asking people for reads (gets townread a lot more than it probably should).

@NSG this is what irritated me about how low effort your engagement with me has been so far

I specifically asked yoh to look back at Flicker's posting so far because 63 was an empty rvsesque vote which felt grossly out of place given we were almost conversational.

is this a blanket scumtell esp. on an inexperienced player? imo no, it's a newbtell and not a scumtell. ergo I prodded her to produce actual content on how she's reading the game rather than RVSing ( again newer players love rvs)

the fact she had reads ready to go makes me think she's been reading the game just held back on sod1 content heavy posts which just feels consistent with her more reserved personality

I'm seeing inexperience here not a wolf. I also don't enjoy the fact you asked me such a simple question when you should have already basically known what I was going to respond with regardless of my alignment, and then shaded me for "not answering" it when I was just alarmed by the fact you weren't putting any effort into seeing how I was feeling when I saw Flicker's 63.

TBC

[RadiantCowbells]

I don't understand what reasons means, so.

[CheekyTeeky]

Ducky...since when did you try so hard?

[CheekyTeeky]

I don't understand what reasons means, so.

Lol it's a joke. Keep doing what you're doing.

[RadiantCowbells]

Do you actually think that I'm scum here?

[northsidegal]

is this a blanket scumtell esp. on an inexperienced player? imo no, it's a newbtell and not a scumtell. ergo I prodded her to produce actual content on how she's reading the game rather than RVSing ( again newer players love rvs)

this is where your line of thinking and mine diverged. whereas you didn't see it as a scumtell, i saw it as a minor one (after checking flicker's previous games).

[the worst]

What relationship between them do you think is most likely?

what do you mean? well, i think i understand what you mean (if i think they're t/s or s/s or whatever), i guess i just don't really get the purpose of the question. are you asking me for my read on tw?

i think it's plausible that tw and flicker are both scum but anything i would say to that end would basically just be conjecture.

ok

Because the last game I played that I remember, we were scum buddies. Perhaps getting a LEGITIMATE claim
will give us shit to do.

But now RC unvoted and this is stupid now.

???

It felt like you were saying SvS in your preceding post, just wanted to see your thought process.

well, my thought process for tw/flicker being s/s would be the worst just trying to draw content out of his scumbuddy and perhaps get them both townread in the process. perhaps this comes after discussion in scumchat about this being flicker's first time rolling scum or some such. like i said - that's a possibility that occurred to me, but i don't really have much that's concrete to assert it apart from just my existing scumread on flicker and strange gut pings on ducky.

ok I dislike your flicker read as outlined above and would be keen to see your thoughts on that but also like.... Really? that would be the weakest thing scum!me could possibly do. I know this is pushing on weak self meta territory but why do you ever seriously consider us s/s here? :/

and you are aware your ability to gut read me is faltering I think? so just ignoring the last part here

problem with this is you're usually top tier at spotting my bad theatre and kinda..... sometimes ok at reading me but have been defaulting to scum since our first few games which is p exhausting

-shrug-

i'm not really scumreading you right now (in the sense that i wouldn't push for your lynch / vote you), i just think your "that's not useful to reading me" reaction was kind of weird.

would also like to see elaboration on "weird" and whether you can see where that reaction came from

[northsidegal]

hey ducky stop talking about my read on you

[the worst]

is this a blanket scumtell esp. on an inexperienced player? imo no, it's a newbtell and not a scumtell. ergo I prodded her to produce actual content on how she's reading the game rather than RVSing ( again newer players love rvs)

this is where your line of thinking and mine diverged. whereas you didn't see it as a scumtell, i saw it as a minor one (after checking flicker's previous games).

Would you mind throwing me some recommended reading? I've been ohoneposting at work so haven't had time to go down this rabbit hole yet but think it's reasonably conceivable you've ninja meta'd her

[the worst]

hey ducky stop talking about my read on you

just explaining where my assertion that it doesn't feel like you're playing at NSG LEVEL yet comes from fam

but ye let's talk Flicker or something more interesting instead

[Toranaga]

anyway her last few posts are better.

welcome aboard

yup

Are you agreeing with him?

yeah I thought that post nsg made scumreading flicker was scummy, but when she reiterated RC should "wait" on his read and what she'd do as scum instead, I really feel that comes from town!nsg quite often. her self meta feels genuine too. she doesn't post as scum and would wait for RC to choke himself instead of arguing with him and being ITT like she is, at least from what I know of her scum game.

[Reasonably Rational]

this is what my reaction looks like when I don't think I'm at threat of being mislynched.

Bullshit.

I actually agree with RC's appraisal of themselves....

Ducky...since when did you try so hard?

It's me, CheekyTeeky. They're trying to impress me.



Real talk though, I was planning on going super hard on D1 for once and my motivation has completely disappeared with the whole multiple conversations held simultaneously with different people and general not actually gamesolving really thing that was going on earlier.

RC, can we call a preemptive truce before Drixx gets online and probably finds a reason to scumread you(not because he's inclined to scumread you, but because he's paranoid) so that way the two of us don't absolutely destroy the thread with noise?

-Cerb

[northsidegal]

Would you mind throwing me some recommended reading? I've been ohoneposting at work so haven't had time to go down this rabbit hole yet but think it's reasonably conceivable you've ninja meta'd her

Flicker, games started relatively close to the beginning and not replaced in later on, i.e. 1863, 1881

[RadiantCowbells]

you can't mislynch me this game.

if drixx wants to tunnel me your slot will die.

[the worst]

It's me, CheekyTeeky. They're trying to impress me.

it-- it's true...

[Reasonably Rational]

you can't mislynch me this game.

if drixx wants to tunnel me your slot will die.

I mean.

This can be interpreted as one of two ways.

1) You're wrong.
2) you're scum(therefore you can't be mislynched, and a tunnel will result in you killing us.

^^

but...I guess I should take that as a...maybe? I don't know. It was a very aggressive answer. :-/
-Cerb