Mini Normal 2030: Day 8

Akarin · Post Post #3725 (ISO) » Mon Oct 01, 2018 1:37 pm

In post 3577, Mister Rogers wrote:So Almost, what do you think of massclaim? FL supported the idea for today?

So how do we feel about a massclaim, for the few who haven't claimed yet?

I'm for it.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #3726 (ISO) » Mon Oct 01, 2018 1:39 pm

I feel like counterclaiming your own buddy feels a bit gratuitous of an idea there

Light Ethos · Post Post #3727 (ISO) » Mon Oct 01, 2018 1:39 pm

In post 3720, Akarin wrote:Am I the only one who read Not_Mafia's gunsmith targeting of claimed masons as sarcasm?

I didn't read it that way. We can ask him.

Akarin · Post Post #3728 (ISO) » Mon Oct 01, 2018 1:42 pm

In post 3727, Light Ethos wrote:
In post 3720, Akarin wrote:Am I the only one who read Not_Mafia's gunsmith targeting of claimed masons as sarcasm?
I didn't read it that way. We can ask him.

What if the answer is sarcastic?

Light Ethos · Post Post #3729 (ISO) » Mon Oct 01, 2018 1:45 pm

In post 3726, Gamma Emerald wrote:I feel like counterclaiming your own buddy feels a bit gratuitous of an idea there

His claim wasn't believable. I didn't buy either the worst's claim or Crimsons.

Akarin · Post Post #3730 (ISO) » Mon Oct 01, 2018 1:47 pm

In post 3682, Almost50 wrote:Naomi: Please sheep me on this.

Naomi can't sheep you anymore. Akarin is thinking about it.

In post 3726, Gamma Emerald wrote:I feel like counterclaiming your own buddy feels a bit gratuitous of an idea there

I was thinking it feels like an idea that might have been shot down in a scum qt on day 1 and reposted as an example.

No one was asking LE what scum LE would have done, but Almost50 had just done something like that and came across towny for doing so.

Akarin · Post Post #3731 (ISO) » Mon Oct 01, 2018 1:48 pm

It is kind of bugging me that Gamma got to L-1 and didn't say anything about it. My vote started the wagon and it was just a naked vote, you have to look back to see that it was process of elimination and that implies I believed 2 claims that people were doubting around that time.

Light Ethos · Post Post #3732 (ISO) » Mon Oct 01, 2018 1:49 pm

In post 3728, Akarin wrote:
In post 3727, Light Ethos wrote:
In post 3720, Akarin wrote:Am I the only one who read Not_Mafia's gunsmith targeting of claimed masons as sarcasm?
I didn't read it that way. We can ask him.
What if the answer is sarcastic?

I don't think it makes a difference. You said it's driving you crazy that people took him seriously. It's irrelevant at this point to me.

Light Ethos · Post Post #3733 (ISO) » Mon Oct 01, 2018 1:52 pm

In post 3730, Akarin wrote:No one was asking LE what scum LE would have done, but Almost50 had just done something like that and came across towny for doing so.

Almost50 was asserting that I am a scum Doctor. I presented what I would have done if I were actually a scum Doctor.

Almost50 · Post Post #3734 (ISO) » Mon Oct 01, 2018 1:54 pm

In post 3719, Light Ethos wrote:My approach would definitely depend on whether my partner got found or not and also who my partner would be. At the worst case, it becomes a WIFOM like the one scum put me into during my first game on this site. RadiantCowbells was in full gamesolve mode from the start and was paranoid of getting night killed. I replaced into a VT slot that was generally a null to scumlean read from most players. Final 3 was me, a guy who replaced in for someone who site flaked, and RadiantCowbells. That LyLo situation seems similar to what you set up. Regardless, the extended hypothetical is not what happened this game.

You had the pleasure of playing Scum!RC? I mean, I don't know what happened, but RC living to a 3-player LyLo = Scum!RC 99% of the time. (unless both scum were new players and so were their replacements)

This -of course- isn't related to this game, but I found it amusing RC would live that long and not get suspected.

Light Ethos · Post Post #3735 (ISO) » Mon Oct 01, 2018 1:56 pm

RadiantCowbells was town that game actually. Both of us lost, but RC was the one who cast the wrong vote. Formerfish was the other scum. IIRC it was his idea to leave RC alive.

Almost50 · Post Post #3736 (ISO) » Mon Oct 01, 2018 1:57 pm

@Akarin: My sincere apologies for using you predecessor's name instead of yours.

Nauci · Post Post #3737 (ISO) » Mon Oct 01, 2018 2:16 pm

Vote Count 3.2

Mister Rogers

(doughboy)

(1) -

Not_Mafia

(The Worst, RockyHorror)

3702

Gamma Emerald

(UC Voyager, Pernicious Parrot)

(1) -

Akarin

(Naomi-Tan)

3551

profii (1) -

Creature

(ManateeDude)

3467

Light Ethos (1) -

Almost50

(FrankJaeger)

3682

Almost50

(FrankJaeger)

(1) -

Mister Rogers

(doughboy)

3704

UNVOTE/Not Voting (3) -

Light Ethos 3453

,

Gamma Emerald

(UC Voyager, Pernicious Parrot)

3453

,

profii 3710

Full vote records are in the OP.

Day 3 ends in (expired on 2018-10-13 12:00:00).

With 8 players alive, it takes 5 votes to lynch.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #3738 (ISO) » Mon Oct 01, 2018 3:29 pm

In post 3731, Akarin wrote:It is kind of bugging me that Gamma got to L-1 and didn't say anything about it. My vote started the wagon and it was just a naked vote, you have to look back to see that it was process of elimination and that implies I believed 2 claims that people were doubting around that time.

I didn’t realize I was L-1? And why does that bother you?

Akarin · Post Post #3739 (ISO) » Mon Oct 01, 2018 4:24 pm

Brief flurry of votes, then they dissipated in all the setup spec confusion and no comment, feels a bit squirrely to me, but not as much as
VOTE: Light Ethos

Akarin · Post Post #3740 (ISO) » Mon Oct 01, 2018 4:25 pm

I love that we can see who is a replacement for who in the votecounts, but wow this game...

Light Ethos · Post Post #3741 (ISO) » Mon Oct 01, 2018 4:29 pm

In post 3739, Akarin wrote:Brief flurry of votes, then they dissipated in all the setup spec confusion and no comment, feels a bit squirrely to me, but not as much as
VOTE: Light Ethos

Here we go

Mister Rogers · Post Post #3742 (ISO) » Mon Oct 01, 2018 4:50 pm

In post 3712, Akarin wrote:@Mister Rogers: If you are that sure of Almost50 being scum and only see Gamma as the possible teammate, are you about as happy lynching Gamma as Almost50?

Yup.

Mister Rogers · Post Post #3743 (ISO) » Mon Oct 01, 2018 4:57 pm

Although that is a mischaracterization. I hold scum in (Almost/N_M/Gamma).

Mister Rogers · Post Post #3744 (ISO) » Mon Oct 01, 2018 5:03 pm

Ok I am scik of this.

In post 1051, Light Ethos wrote:I'm not a VT, but my role is only as valuable as the trust I have in the game.

Now either this was BS and you are scum or its not and About is scum, so which is it?

Light Ethos · Post Post #3745 (ISO) » Mon Oct 01, 2018 5:44 pm

In post 3744, Mister Rogers wrote:Ok I am scik of this.

In post 1051, Light Ethos wrote:I'm not a VT, but my role is only as valuable as the trust I have in the game.
Now either this was BS and you are scum or its not and About is scum, so which is it?

Why are you certain that both aren't possible?

Light Ethos · Post Post #3746 (ISO) » Mon Oct 01, 2018 5:46 pm

It wasn't BS, but I don't think it invalidates Almost50's claim either.

Almost50 · Post Post #3747 (ISO) » Mon Oct 01, 2018 6:06 pm

In post 3746, Light Ethos wrote:It wasn't BS, but I don't think it invalidates Almost50's claim either.

Can you please claim? I mean, most of us are for a massclaim anyway, and I think it should help us a LOT. I only wish we had done that yesterday because FL is better than me at this still.

Light Ethos · Post Post #3748 (ISO) » Mon Oct 01, 2018 6:38 pm

Sure. I'm a Town Two-Shot Bulletproof. I was hoping to bait out a night kill at some point with 1051, but Flavor Leaf's fake claims prevented that from happening.

Mister Rogers · Post Post #3749 (ISO) » Mon Oct 01, 2018 6:40 pm

Town is OP? There is no room for a town R/B but scum assumed that everyone is VT and didn't know of your claim.

PEDIT: ...