mini normal 2027: advice mafia (endgrame)

[schadd_]

corn and beans cover each others' missing essential amino acids to make a good protein source when paired

Vote count 4.2

texcat (2):

Brian Skies, Gamma Emerald

Gamma Emerald (1):

texcat

not voting (4):

Skygazer, Havo, Ruby Red, Nauci

with 7 alive, it takes 4 to lynch. day 4 ends october 7th at 14:20 central US time; in (expired on 2018-10-07 14:20:00)

mod notes

• replacing nauci

[/area]

[Brian Skies]

Not to be insensitive or anything, but I kinda just want to save schadd the hassle and lynch Nauci.

[texcat]

And the plus would be that we'd be lynching scum.

[Brian Skies]

VOTE: Nauci

[texcat]

VOTE: Nauci

[Havo]

Not to be insensitive or anything, but I kinda just want to save schadd the hassle and lynch Nauci.

Wow.

[Skygazer]

Why Nauci over Gamma or texcat?

Consider this: if nauci flips town and scum has a roleblocker I'll likely be roleblocked if there is one (the fact that RC was a jailkeeper and Krazy still died makes me think there's a heavy chance RC could've been RB'd) and Ruby will be night killed leaving no one mechanically clear in lylo. texcat is my biggest scum read here atm and the fact that she just quickly jumped onto Nauci reeks of survivalism and makes me think that Nauci flips town here because it doesn't feel like distancing. I feel like we should wait for a replacement to come in and give actual sortable input which Nauci gave us none because of her situation so we can actually narrow down which two of Gamma/tex/nauci is scum.

[Skygazer]

like it worries me that people are trying to tie me into a havo scum team because neither of us flip town and scum certainly doesnt want to kill me if they can leave me alive with no further results through a rb or whatever

esp because my flip creates a clear

[Skygazer]

did i incorrectly locktown CT

cause that was one of RC's strong scum reads and like the way Brian just voted Nauci with texcat is eh

[texcat]

I've been saying that I thought the scum have to be Gamma and Nauci for quite some time now. Don't act surprised that I voted Nauci.

[Brian Skies]

Why Nauci over Gamma or texcat?

I'm scumreading Nauci anyway, and he didn't answer my questions before replacing out, so...why bother waiting for a replacement?

Have you iso'ed Gamma or Nauci like you said you would?

Consider this: if nauci flips town and scum has a roleblocker I'll likely be roleblocked if there is one (the fact that RC was a jailkeeper and Krazy still died makes me think there's a heavy chance RC could've been RB'd)

Meh.

I think a Strongman is just as plausible as a Roleblocker.

texcat is my biggest scum read here atm and the fact that she just quickly jumped onto Nauci reeks of survivalism and makes me think that Nauci flips town here because it doesn't feel like distancing. I feel like we should wait for a replacement to come in and give actual sortable input which Nauci gave us none because of her situation so we can actually narrow down which two of Gamma/tex/nauci is scum.

I still think texcat could be scum. I'm still fine with lynching her.

If there's no RB, and we mislynch, then there is a decent chance you die since you're still an investigative role. If we lynch scum and there's no RB, then you should still be a threat since you can confirm yourself as town.

I don't really care that much about a 'hypothetical scumrole that may not even exist.'

[Brian Skies]

<- Also indicated suspicion or a scumread on Nauci for pretty much the entirety of the day.

[Brian Skies]

did i incorrectly locktown CT

cause that was one of RC's strong scum reads and like the way Brian just voted Nauci with texcat is eh

Also, your 180 here when you don't even have a stance regarding Nauci/Gamma is noted.

[Gamma Emerald]

did i incorrectly locktown CT

cause that was one of RC's strong scum reads and like the way Brian just voted Nauci with texcat is eh

Also, your 180 here when you don't even have a stance regarding Nauci/Gamma is noted.

Why does that matter? You’re voting with the person you were just voting.

[Brian Skies]

Why does that matter? You’re voting with the person you were just voting.

Who cares?

If you're tracking my reads, then you would know that texcat and Nauci are at the bottom of my reads?

Since this is a mini, there are ~1-2 scum in this game.

Stop acting like I can only vote one scumread ever.

[Havo]

Brian I’d prefer you to vote your STRONGEST scum read here.

Because we really need to hit scum today.

[Brian Skies]

At first, I thought Horror's early post about struggling with the game to be town-indciative because I also struggled with the first 14 pages or so. However, now I feel like it was probably scum that couldn't get into the game. I especially feel this way regarding Nauci since she mostly just made a fairly lamist catch-up post that she admitted was not helpful in 1859. Not to mention in that very post, he chastised us for the FA lynch because 104 was 'towny af' even though FA was pretty much just answering an RQS (which shouldn't even be alignment indicative). A lot of the other comments is just commenting based on known alignments and buddying Havo. Not to mention that in 1967, she's scumreading my predecessor for 'effort.' Yes, let that sink in, effort is apparently a scumtell.

Nauci also opposed the massclaim but admitted she didn't even have a reason. And it's not like she had any sensitive information to withhold/share as she claimed VT.

Not to mention the concerns I brought up about HWS in 1962.

I think the slot is scummy. I don't want to wait for a replacement because I can't hold that person responsible for the things I would be scumreading their predecessors for. I can't just be like 'why did you say x' or 'why did you do x' because they aren't the person that said or did it.

I also don't want to have to figure out how to sort a replacement in Lylo.

I'm also not appreciative of people bitching and moaning about 'apathy' or 'why are you voting this person instead of the person you were voting before' instead of actually thinking about my intentions or motivations or the fact that I was already scumreading Nauci and stated my desire to lynch Nauci before texcat even voted.

It's not like any of you have shown much interest (if any) in sorting Gamma/Nauci, so instead of the lazy finger pointing, how about you all actually do something and try to sort the slots yourselves.

And I'm especially calling Gamma out since he seems more than happy to shade the PR claims but doesn't seem all that interested in sorting the VT claims.

[Brian Skies]

Anyhow, we've got four days.

And to be honest, I did come into today thinking texcat was probably the best lynch, but I'm not really sure she is anymore. Basically, I thought Gamma would still have an incredibly awkward scumgame. But after taking a look through some of his more recent games, I'm not so sure about that anymore, especially since he seems to be improving.

Also, the entire 'texcat isn't progressing the game' and 'texcat isn't putting in effort' or whatever arguments don't really resonate with me.

And I guess I can see how someone wouldn't want to vote a mason on Day 1 if someone else claimed mason with them. Or how someone might think Garmr wasn't remorseful enough about lynching a mason on Day 1.

Also, not really a huge fan of a tex/Nauci scumteam because that would mean the Wh4t wagon was an all-town wagon (cue Havo and the 'this site is obsessed with bussing', because it's true).

Also, some paranoia on Gamma regarding the Wh4t wagon since his scumread and vote there seemed to come out of nowhere (1489, 1491.

[Brian Skies]

Skygazer could just be a Mafia Rolecop, I guess.

this thought occurred to me

3 masons in an 11 person game. Keeps eating at me.

Like, I get the paranoia.

But stuff like this isn't helpful and makes the game harder.

Also, I'm not infallible. And if it's so important to lynch scum

today

, then obviously it's important that I'm not just deathtunneling a townie.

[Havo]

VOTE: Texcat

[Gamma Emerald]

Anyhow, we've got four days.

And to be honest, I did come into today thinking texcat was probably the best lynch, but I'm not really sure she is anymore. Basically, I thought Gamma would still have an incredibly awkward scumgame. But after taking a look through some of his more recent games, I'm not so sure about that anymore, especially since he seems to be improving.

Also, the entire 'texcat isn't progressing the game' and 'texcat isn't putting in effort' or whatever arguments don't really resonate with me.

And I guess I can see how someone wouldn't want to vote a mason on Day 1 if someone else claimed mason with them. Or how someone might think Garmr wasn't remorseful enough about lynching a mason on Day 1.

Also, not really a huge fan of a tex/Nauci scumteam because that would mean the Wh4t wagon was an all-town wagon (cue Havo and the 'this site is obsessed with bussing', because it's true).

Also, some paranoia on Gamma regarding the Wh4t wagon since his scumread and vote there seemed to come out of nowhere (1489, 1491.

No?
I swear I said I agreed with RC’s logic somewhere

[Brian Skies]

Gamma, what are your reads?

[Gamma Emerald]

Ruby Red 100% Town
Havo 90% Town
Skygazer 83% Town
Brian Skies and Nauci meh
Texcat scum

[Brian Skies]

What are your thoughts regarding what I've said about the Nauci slot?

[Brian Skies]

Also, can you explain your scumread on texcat?