in a vacuum she just doesn't read as townIn post 1043, northsidegal wrote:if you think rc is town you should also probably think mala is town, although i concede that perhaps my skygazer read might change
Have you seen RC read mala correctly in the past?In post 1048, northsidegal wrote:which I don't think is unreasonable
It's not self-defeatist, I think I just didn't get across my meaning all that clearly. What I'm saying is that when I make a case, I want it to be decisive and I want it to get the person I make it on lynched. I'm wondering if the gamestate right now is prepared for a lynch, or if we're just going to be doing the "rising and falling wagons" thing for a few more days. I don't want to make a case to get a wagon and then have it die off when some townie does something outrageous or stupid.In post 1049, CheekyTeeky wrote:2 doesn't make sense to me - is it a self-defeatist statement? Are you saying "why bother trying?"
No, but he's claimed familiarity and malakittens made a comment to a similar effect later.In post 1051, CheekyTeeky wrote:Have you seen RC read mala correctly in the past?In post 1048, northsidegal wrote:which I don't think is unreasonable
IT'S CHARA! HYPE! HI!In post 1054, Chara wrote:hello everyone! it's 1am so i refuse to read any of this right now, but nice to see all of you.
that's you giving weight to RC's read on malakittens, which is fine but my read on mala is that her posting is scummy and her tvt read on me/rc, when mala is scum, makes RC slot town a lot. I explained this already.In post 1037, northsidegal wrote:what? i don't logically follow. i'm pretty sure that cheeky is townreading RC, so why does town RC imply scum malakittens? my thinking was the exact opposite - rc and malakittens seem to have some history together and it seems like he's able to read her pretty well, so i've put her down as town for now.
her town v town read "when" she's scum? it sounds to me like you're either just assuming mala is scum or are committing some kind of logical fallacy.In post 1060, Nancy Drew Shogunate wrote:that's you giving weight to RC's read on malakittens, which is fine but my read on mala is that her posting is scummy and her tvt read on me/rc, when mala is scum, makes RC slot town a lot. I explained this already.
I think not taking a stance either way was scummy of mala, yes.In post 1062, northsidegal wrote:her town v town read "when" she's scum? it sounds to me like you're either just assuming mala is scum or are committing some kind of logical fallacy.In post 1060, Nancy Drew Shogunate wrote:that's you giving weight to RC's read on malakittens, which is fine but my read on mala is that her posting is scummy and her tvt read on me/rc, when mala is scum, makes RC slot town a lot. I explained this already.
are you just saying that in a vacuum you think mala's tvt read on you and RC makes her scum?
Why would mala need to appease you both?In post 1065, Nancy Drew Shogunate wrote:"looks tvt" is a way to appease both parties and something I expect to come more from scum than town,
she doesn't need to, but she might instinctively do it because scum doesn't want to be noticed and targeted. I see a lot on MS the scum calling shti tvt instead of making an actual stance. the people getting on with the dirt and drawing leans from it (e.g. you) are almost always town.In post 1067, CheekyTeeky wrote:Why would mala need to appease you both?In post 1065, Nancy Drew Shogunate wrote:"looks tvt" is a way to appease both parties and something I expect to come more from scum than town,
Sometimes I wonder if people don't give her scumgame enough credit. I'm pretty sure NSG is aware of what people expect and able to adjust if need be. Meta aside she hasn't done anything particularly townie and I feel there is some subconscious cogdis in her posting.In post 1066, Nancy Drew Shogunate wrote:NSG naturally posting in the thread makes her town. it's not a hard read cause her town/scum ranges are imbalanced.
In post 1038, northsidegal wrote:i think flicker is probably scum and i think she probably lives very far into the game (maybe even endgame if we lose) if i don't put effort into getting her lynched
that's not a promise of effort, just a reflection on myself and the way games have been going for me recently.
Like here TW. It makes me feel like her first statement regarding flicker is disingenuous.In post 1045, northsidegal wrote:Here's the thing: do you think we're far enough into the day that:In post 1040, CheekyTeeky wrote:NSG can you case flicker please?
1) Flicker has enough content that anything I say couldn't be explained away by it just being early in the day
2) A case I make is actually likely to make progress towards getting Flicker lynched and not just having random votes on and off the wagon?
These aren't rhetorical questions, they're just completely serious questions. Part of the reason why sometimes I guess I don't do much is because I very much so like to give things time so that people can produce enough content where either their newer content makes me rethink my read from their earlier posting, or they have enough posts such that anything I bring up is actually meaningful and won't just be overlooked as an artifact of it being early on in the game.
