copped in the morning, at L-2, then promptly entered the escape room.In post 2360, Chickadee wrote:Or it's entirely possible flipping through things on my phone I got dates and such jumbled. But I copped @ L-2, and then promptly went into an escape room with friends.
But I'll await RR.
Edited to reflect new claim time.In post 2325, Chickadee wrote:I submitted the cop on October 12, 7:48am (Central time)
What are you hoping to get by making me look at time stamps?
This is sketchy too, all things considered.In post 2332, Chickadee wrote:I got the Porkens result shortly after submitting (8:26pm that night)
Realized I could confirm this by temporarily changing my board time zone, and yup, NDS posted 1908 at 8:39 am CST.In post 2377, Flicker wrote:Just to add to the skeptical pile-on... wouldn't 7:48 am CT be nearly an hourbeforeNDS posted 1908? (Or does Chick not live in a place with DST?)
Well... This is the exact response that means I might be wrong, but RR is smart enough to know that, so...In post 2374, Reasonably Rational wrote:I'm at work Jingles, and hadn't looked at any of the times she said yet, and was not aware of when the lynch happened because again, I had not looked anything up yet. If you'll note my entry to the thread today, I even said I was just jumping in and hadn't read up on the context of her claim yet(and I still haven't). I wanted to make sure she had times, which I was going to look at after I got off work/wasn't busy interviewing people at work.In post 2355, Jingle wrote:I'm going to wait for RR to explain himself before I answer that, CT.
I appreciate your catching that though, +1 for Jingle.
-Cerb
but then why say you submitted and then immediately went into the escape room? if you were just assuming it was nighttime, why did you also assume that the two happened right next to each other when they did not?In post 2381, Chickadee wrote:And I already said I was peicing together my timeline from the timestamps. I was assuming it was night, and I know I went in to an escape room that night. I thought the timing was odd too. But it was morning, which s why things seemed odd to me.
Because we might want to lynch you at some other stage.In post 2381, Chickadee wrote:Can we just agree that flipping back and through on a phone between thread and messages (of which I have a lot) got me jumbled. I don't think anyone wants to lynchme today, so why are we still talking as if we're considering it?
As I said earlier, not looking to lynch Chickadee today.In post 2382, Jingle wrote:Thoughts?
eh, this doesn't resonate with me.In post 2382, Jingle wrote:Cerb didn't verify the time, despite being sure that timestamp slips can catch scum. The argument for this being a scumslip is that him NOT verifying means that he didn't think Chick was lying.
I can say with reasonable certainty that if Cerb and chick are both scum, it is of two separate scumteams. I'm also not really sure I buy the 'didn't check the timestamps yet' thing, given that he's posted 6 times? today.
Thoughts?
Let me let you in on a little secret of my posting habits during the hours of 9AM to 5PM MST, M-F.In post 2382, Jingle wrote:Well... This is the exact response that means I might be wrong, but RR is smart enough to know that, so...In post 2374, Reasonably Rational wrote:I'm at work Jingles, and hadn't looked at any of the times she said yet, and was not aware of when the lynch happened because again, I had not looked anything up yet. If you'll note my entry to the thread today, I even said I was just jumping in and hadn't read up on the context of her claim yet(and I still haven't). I wanted to make sure she had times, which I was going to look at after I got off work/wasn't busy interviewing people at work.In post 2355, Jingle wrote:I'm going to wait for RR to explain himself before I answer that, CT.
I appreciate your catching that though, +1 for Jingle.
-Cerb
Cerb didn't verify the time, despite being sure that timestamp slips can catch scum. The argument for this being a scumslip is that him NOT verifying means that he didn't think Chick was lying.
I can say with reasonable certainty that if Cerb and chick are both scum, it is of two separate scumteams. I'm also not really sure I buy the 'didn't check the timestamps yet' thing, given that he's posted 6 times? today.
Thoughts?
Well, shit.In post 2386, Thor665 wrote:As I said earlier, not looking to lynch Chickadee today.
Would lynch RR before Chickadee (but I was a short trip down that path)
Going off the theory 9 town (or at least a small town) I'm also of a mind that sticking to shopping in the more overt scummy slots remains a better play over either of the above.
I'm indifferent about the Nico question since Chick had to scum up the claim so much - but still tend to softly go they'd need to be partners, and Chick did step into a firing line for Nico considering odds of other killing roles, so...meh, I kinda lean town on both at the moment.
calm down. voting you would only come after we've finished the whole questioning thing.In post 2385, Chickadee wrote:Because I've been very busy and I was trying, for my own personal sense of time, to think of when things happened.
Chara, serious question, are you considering voting me? If so, just do it.
Frankly, I'd rather vote Malakittens, but I don't want to be a lone, unproductive voter, and it's not like I have anywhere better to vote, so okay.In post 2280, CheekyTeeky wrote:@Flicker vote with us.
Did this btw. Kinda wish I'd just waited for the big reveal.In post 2388, Reasonably Rational wrote:Back to work stuff, I do still like the fact that you caught this, and I think it really means you should probably do what Drixx asked, if you haven't already, because you're going to be one of the people I expect to catch what's there to see.