Can you quote those again, just in case I missed them?In post 3197, Thor665 wrote:Why not? Because of the reasons I listed.In post 3156, BuJaber wrote:@Thor - why not Menno thouhh? Also it was really only 4 of us max.. the same 4 people who think menno is scum are flip flopping between him and other wagons.
1.) Cheeky's been here long enough to know the same thing and to know that the answer will either be "town" or tongue-in-cheek and is also NAI. I gave a tongue-in-cheek answer and Cheeky flipped out.In post 3197, Thor665 wrote:1. I'll agree that asking someone's alignment is not super helpful - at the same stage, if you've played more than two games here on site you also have to be blatantly aware that this empty question is asked often, and is often asked by town. So I don't get the point in bothering to even talk about it, because as far as I've ever been able to tell asking it is NAI. Yeah?In post 3184, Tails wrote:1.)What's your alignment?
Regardless of their actual alignment, your subject will always answer "Town". Unless they're being snarky or just avoid answering altogether. Asking this actually doesn't accomplish anything.
2.)What was your predecessor crumbing?
Assuming that I read my predecessor (I didn't and made clear I was not reading a lot of the back log of this game.), why would I answer? If I don't have a PR, I'll be confused and answer "I don't know." And if I have a PR, then I'm still going to answer "I don't know.", because I'm not going to tell you my role genius! At best, this gives you something you can try to use to look like a scum tell, but regardless of alignment or role, you are not going to get a "Yes" answer from this question.
2. This isn't a particularly valid rebuttal. Your slot is under a lot of stress even with a theory Cop clear arguing in your defense. It is under this stress, to a large part, because of how that '2' stuff went down. As a player, if you are town, it should be relatively simple to try to assess if that was a crumb and the reasoning for it with your role, and it's hardly a shock that you are looking like a likely lynch and should be getting emotionally ready to reveal your role if not already doing so.
2.)But my point still stands that regardless, my answer would have to be the same. Either I know or don't. I have a role that could be crumbed or I don't. And even if I did, my answer couldn't be anything other than "No clue" or "I don't know". Because no one in their right mind is going to admit to having a PR before they have to. Outside of that, I can't give any insight to my predecessor's state of mind or why they said something at the very beginning of the game or whether that was game important information. I'm essentially swimming up a waterfall, and I find the whole situation absurd. Therefore my only recourse is to point out how absurd this whole situation really is, because this wouldn't happen in any other game, and it just feels like picking on the newbie lurker and then I get stuck with the transfer after I ruffle some feathers.
And yes, I've been accepting the foregone conclusion that I'll have to claim. But I'd rather not all things considered. So I'll continue to try to convince the men in sill hats why rowing up a waterfall is a silly idea.
Because other than role fish, that's all I've really seen her do. And when I start hard pressuring her on it, she crumbles. So I'm in a situation where if I make observations and don't hard push someone, I'm not scum hunting. But if I start asking a lot of pertinent questions and hard pushing, I'm a meanie and deserve to die. I'm essentially in a lose/lose situation here.In post 3197, Thor665 wrote: Why are you dogging so hard on Cheeky for asking 1. A NAI question and 2. A very valid question?
I don't recall you asking that while I've been here. Feel free to quote.In post 3197, Thor665 wrote: Hell, pretty sure I asked #2 as well - don't recall you crawling up my leg about it.