coolIn post 3298, Flicker wrote:NicoRobin.In post 3295, Nancy Drew Shogunate wrote:who did tails replace in for?
Because in my pool of non-claims "Ari, Chara, BuJaber, Tails, Thor" you're the most likely to be scum imo. Also the alternative wagon options on Tails and Flicker aren't the most appetising. I'd probably go Flicker over Tails if I can't consolidate a wagon on you.In post 3299, Nancy Drew Shogunate wrote:why are you voting us, cheeky?
BuJaber confused me with Chick. Chick is a modified day cop. She thinks Tails is River/Simon. RR thinks the check plus the weird crumb at the beginning of Nicos iso point to Tails being HoB. It does make sense but even though the dude rubs me the wrong way he's trying.In post 3300, Nancy Drew Shogunate wrote:coolIn post 3298, Flicker wrote:NicoRobin.In post 3295, Nancy Drew Shogunate wrote:who did tails replace in for?
cheeky did you explain what type of green check you have on nico? is it a peek, or is it something else? sorry if you already did that.
Noted.
Hello, my name isn’t Flicker, last time I checked?In post 3292, CheekyTeeky wrote:I think I'd rather vote Flicker than tails, from a contribution PoV. Also I take back the McMenno wagon being a good idea. Thor, let's get it started.
VOTE: NDS
Nope, we’re town. Sorry to disappoint.In post 3301, CheekyTeeky wrote:Because in my pool of non-claims "Ari, Chara, BuJaber, Tails, Thor" you're the most likely to be scum imo. Also the alternative wagon options on Tails and Flicker aren't the most appetising. I'd probably go Flicker over Tails if I can't consolidate a wagon on you.In post 3299, Nancy Drew Shogunate wrote:why are you voting us, cheeky?
I said I don’t believe you’re actually scumreading me and you’re pushing us due to the lhf factor. When dif I ever claim to be obvtown? I said I would BECOME obvtown eventually? Do you suffer from selective reading ability or what? Do you want to bring up the quote because this is a complete misrepresentation of what I actually DID say.In post 3313, CheekyTeeky wrote:So you said you obv town, which hasn't happened...and now you're low hanging fruit? The omgus is real.
That wouldn’t be possible really, since we’re not but nice shade, anyway. Let me know when you actually have a case on me because this obviously isn’t it.
LHF? Is this a mistaken auto correct, or am I missing something?In post 3312, Nancy Drew Shogunate wrote:I think you townread me and are pushing a mislynch on lhf.
This is the thing. Cheeky is deliberately misrepresenting what I actually said and she damn well knows it. Jump on us for what we actually did say, not agenday of what was really said. And I’m well aware and I was planning to make up for this on Day 3. I’ve been dealing with a lot and Cheeky is trying to taunt me for some reason -I’m still not sure to what end.In post 3315, Chara wrote:it's hard to obvtown when you're inactive, to be fair.
Low hanging fruit. Her timing is highly suspect. Unlike Thor who has never moved his vote off of us, Cheeky suddenly pushing us seems to be more about stopping another wagon than anything to do with us.In post 3318, Flicker wrote:LHF? Is this a mistaken auto correct, or am I missing something?In post 3312, Nancy Drew Shogunate wrote:I think you townread me and are pushing a mislynch on lhf.
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}
In post 3320, Chara wrote:lhf is low hanging fruit.
also i definitely don't want to lynch Flicker today. i believe Rational is wrong about the flavour thing making her suspicious.
pedit: i'd still be scumreading Cheeky (and i may go back to that later when more flavous revealed), but i have them as town mechanically.
anyway you're here now, that's good.
So, you think it somehow scummy to vote the player that you believe is making a bad highly questionable push on you?In post 3313, CheekyTeeky wrote:So you said you obv town, which hasn't happened...and now you're low hanging fruit? The omgus is real.
