Mini Normal 2040: Day 4

[BrightEyedFish]

You say you want to lynch scum but this vote is pure OMGUS.

How can it be OMGUS when her push is on N_M and not me? I am trying my best to get her to redirect her attention to me still.

Then why such a quick unvote?

[DrDolittle]

vote count 1.04

Day 1, Vote Count 4

tictac

(4) : Clemency, BrightEyedFish, ofrhz, Auro

(L-2)

DVa

(2) : Sashaddin, Not_Mafia

Not_Mafia

(2) : DVa, Elsa Jay

Auro

(1) : tictac

Almost50

(0) :

Elsa Jay

(0) :

orfhz

(0) :

BrightEyedFish

(0) :

Clemency

(0) :

Sashaddin

(0) :

Not voting:

: Almost50

with 10 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.

day one will end with no lynch in (expired on 2018-11-09 19:00:00)

[Almost50]

You say you want to lynch scum but this vote is pure OMGUS.

How can it be OMGUS when her push is on N_M and not me? I am trying my best to get her to redirect her attention to me still.

Then why such a quick unvote?

Because ofrhz said so.

When you've played enough games with me you might understand how I appreciate the presence of my friends in games I play or mod. I have no solid evidence of scum DVa. I only get the feeling she's being intentionally manipulative. Now ofrhz knows her better, and also knows me well enough, and if she deems this play to be indicative of Town DVa then I will trust her for the time being.

You also saw me once and know that I can be both manipulative and unpleasant as Town, so if i'm giving myself space to act in a certain way I believe I can give others the same privilege and especially so based on someone else's recommendation when that someone else I also know well enough.

Have you lost track of whay I'm saying yet? because that's what I'm trying to do, obviously.. get you so confused you would refrain from going further with your interrogation. Let me know when you've reached the limit and are bored enough to continue reading my BS and I'll stop.

[Almost50]

Oh, shit That was a bad unvote indeed. DVa was actually the competing wagon to tictac's, and it would have been nice to see whom votes which of them and for what reasons.

OK, out of the current 3 top wagons this is my preference: DVa > tictac > N_M.

I won't be voting N_M today even if it resulted in a No Lynch.

I hope that's clear enough.

My vote is on DVa in spirit, but we have lots of time to inspect everyone else.

[tictac]

VOTE: Not Mafia

Honestly, DVa arguing 4 this is the only reason, I didn't replace out already.
If she does, I'm following.

I'd prefer A50 policy actually, but this has a wagon already.

[Auro]

@Tictac: A50 "policy"? You mean lynch A50 for defending Not_Mafia?

I think Not_Mafia could be left as a compromise lynch rather than policy, as Elsa Jay also points out. Don't you agree?

[tictac]

Pretty much everything that has been said about NotMaf applies to A50, only he is noisier.

I'm not really interested in lynching anyone besides NotMaf or A50 rn.
Don't really see the point in pretending otherwise.

[tictac]

I don't have the energy or desire to put up with this actually. I didn't join this game to policy lynch two back to back people. I like 7/9 of the players in this game but A50 + Not_Mafia apparently = a game not worth playing. If Not_mafia isn't going to try and you're going to white knight him like a tryhard scrub then this game is dead to me

100% agreed.

I was willing to have NotMaf as a possible end-of-day compromise.
Both of these player in a game means day1

has

to be a policy 4 the game to have any meaning.

[Not_Mafia]

VOTE: tictac

DVa might be the dullest player of all time

[Auro]

@tictac: But there's a lot of content right now from A50 to work off of. I don't see the similarity, please clarify on that. I take it you've played with them before.

I'm heavily leaning towards DVa being town from the above interaction. I can't really see solid scum motivation from her - DVa seemed ready to change her vote if Not_Mafia actually began to contribute, which favors town.

@A50: What was your motivation in trying to lead DVa into a 1v1? To make you two the leading wagons? Did you want to prove some point, like your claim that town would never lynch you D1? Anti-town in any case.

@tictac, again: So you don't see this as a TvT argument? If you can, help outline the scum motivation behind A50's arguments. If NotMaf, you're essentially policy lynching a lurker and are disinterested in searching for scum elsewhere.

[Auro]

UNVOTE: tictac

Moving him back to L-2.

[Auro]

So you're asserting that both Not_Mafia and A50 being together, even if town, mean the game doesn't have any meaning. Reasoning being it's not his defending Not_Mafia, rather their "trolling" playstyle?

[tictac]

scum motivation behind A50's arguments.

What part of "policy" don't ya get?

[tictac]

So you're asserting that both Not_Mafia and A50 being together, even if town, mean the game doesn't have any meaning. Reasoning being it's not his defending Not_Mafia, rather their "trolling" playstyle?

Ya.

[Auro]

scum motivation behind A50's arguments.

What part of "policy" don't ya get?

Hence the "if you can, help".

Fine, it's policy for you, and you don't want to analyze their interaction in this game. Okay.

[Almost50]

UNVOTE: tictac

Moving him back to L-2.

N_M is already on the wagon = No quick hammers. You should've left him @L-1 for me to state intent and demand a claim. tictac has just finished a game with me and he knows well this is my playstyle. For better or worse he should've deduced this is NAI at worst.

[tictac]

UNVOTE: tictac

Moving him back to L-2.

N_M is already on the wagon = No quick hammers. You should've left him @L-1 for me to state intent and demand a claim. tictac has just finished a game with me and he knows well this is my playstyle. For better or worse he should've deduced this is NAI at worst.

What part of "policy" don't ya get?
Dunno why ya don't L-1 me yerself, unless what ya actually wanted to to was quickhammer.

[BrightEyedFish]

UNVOTE: tictac

Moving him back to L-2.

N_M is already on the wagon = No quick hammers. You should've left him @L-1 for me to state intent and demand a claim. tictac has just finished a game with me and he knows well this is my playstyle. For better or worse he should've deduced this is NAI at worst.

You know, you could put him back at L-1 yourself

[Not_Mafia]

Read again

[Auro]

N_M is already on the wagon = No quick hammers. You should've left him @L-1 for me to state intent and demand a claim. tictac has just finished a game with me and he knows well this is my playstyle. For better or worse he should've deduced this is NAI at worst.

I thought you might ITH him, and hence was quick to unvote.
He's stated it's policy and nothing off your play in the game currently.
I don't think I want a claim/hammer on him at the moment. I'll take my time to use my vote.

[Not_Mafia]

VOTE: Fugu

Let's wagon this, it will be productive

[Auro]

@A50: What was your motivation in trying to lead DVa into a 1v1? To make you two the leading wagons? Did you want to prove some point, like your claim that town would never lynch you D1

Would still like an answer to this.

[Not_Mafia]

Auro what do you think of wagoning Fugu?

[Auro]

@Not_Mafia: I will if DVa will!

[Not_Mafia]

Is DVa your mum or something?