i havne't really gotten this vibe from irrel tbh
==
i really don't believe this but i'd feel dumb as anything lynching an actual day2 ic tbh
i'm fine leaving him till tomorrow and lynching him tomorrow if his claim isn't corroborated by the mod; my preferred lynch in that instance would be mew
==
In post 2162, AlmostNancy wrote:It’s scummy to want players who are actively driving this game, to be able to properly make reads, before the end of the month - HOW exactly?
he didn't say: hi i'm bouncing for the next two weeks, bye (honestly if that was the scenario i think he'd just rep-out)
he said he's on vacation and doesn't have as much time/interest in responding to each of your posts or doing comprehensive metadives until he gets back
he's present (more present than a lot of people) and has reads and is a driving force in the game
you seem to be upset at him / finding his vacation unacceptable when i think his activity is ... just fine, especially since he's on vacation, and you were telling him to rep-out
idk if it's scummy but i think it's inconsiderate of you given that he is very clearly and obviously into this game and is active. not being able to form a read on one player on day1 is fine imo
yeah the intensive metadives can wait and like ... it's fine if he doesn't have a concrete read on you in the next two weeks; it's a large and tbh you both will probably still be here
i think your expectations of him are unrealistic and not entirely fair
also you almost seem to be scumreading him for scumreading you and like ... just because he has a wrong read doesn't mean he's scum?
like i said last night ... you're very pre-occupied about how people read you, and that seems to be your major focus this game. and like unless you literally think he's scum for scumreading you - who cares what his read on you is; let him figure it out in his own time