Cause No profile picture. What are you hiding?
mini 2048: more songs (game ougre)
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
In post 10, Trivium wrote:No wait you should have JOINED in 2011 wow I'm retarded
This took allot of effort.In post 11, Trivium wrote:A new challenger approaches: Trivium trips into the fight!-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
Can't even both to put your reasoning.....Found my first two suspects off the bat.
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
not you.....
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
it was the trivium wagon, for some reason the game didn't update all the way today, or my wife been reading the thread here, cause I read a few posts after my last, and that was it, wagon was forming. I'll make sure to refresh in the future just in case random shit.
Vote Lapsa
Idk what your doing, but why you pushing for such a early lynch when nobody put reasoning behind it. If you think I'm going to commit to a shit lynch wagon, your crazy. or asking anybody for that matter. I have to wonder about you.-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
Targets for what?In post 113, Lapsa wrote:@Robert are you running out of targets or something?Yeah...Idk why he's so eager to find our cop, if we have a cop.
Sure, we can call it "Naked voting". I would call it more, unwilling to provide reasoning for your said vote to move here. Unless you have something to hide, sure. I've never liked votes like that, and I don't think I'm going to start now. Guess I'll be poking people with a stick just to figure out what the hell they are thinking.In post 144, Doughboy wrote:I personally think Robert is way scummier. The way he discredited people for naked voting isn’t townie. Naked voting is perfectly acceptable. His other posts leave much to be desired.
I have to ask though, Wagon, whats up with the coin thing? I mean its very creative, don't get me wrong, I'm just wondering about it.-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
Riding in a Xwing sounds fun and all, but I'd rather fly an Awing. *cue star wars music*.In post 158, Trivium wrote:Golden's posts very self focused, noncommittal, wanting to direct votes in a subtle way, and feels like he's trying to ride the xwing
Well, I've never been called cunning so I guess thanks? lol.In post 159, Doughboy wrote:
How can you tell the difference? Also it doesn’t take cunning scum to do what he did. It’s easy for scum to push on things they would push if they were town. That doesn’t take cunning. It takes common sense.In post 150, TheGoldenParadox wrote:I see where you're coming from, but right now Robert is more "overeager town" than "cunning scum" in my eyes. This could change. In the meantime, I'd like you to evaluate how you feel about the various other wagons.
I really shouldn't have to ask people, hence my response before. If I need to poke people with a stick to see what the hell they are thinking, the vote has no context and dose nothing but pretend they are playing a number game without logic or reasoning, in witch case why play mafia. But if I have to do that, I guess I will. I like to share my thoughts as I get them, as if I die, at least I don't waste people time reading my posts. Even if its a lawl, vote, say some cheesy or funny to say that it is. Its unimaginative, and uncreative and dose nothing for the town. So I don't like it.In post 160, Doughboy wrote:
Somebody not giving a reason doesn’t mean they are unwilling to.In post 152, Robert2424 wrote:Sure, we can call it "Naked voting". I would call it more, unwilling to provide reasoning
Did you bother to ask them why they voted?-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
If they don't have time, don't post. I only posts when I'm not at work and on my home computer. If they are going for reactions, they are just putting unneeded spotlight on themself. I don't see why you need to defend naked voting so much.In post 184, Doughboy wrote:
You do if you want to know why they voted. You can’t say people refused to provide reasons just because they didn’t give one. Sometimes it’s good to not give a reason. Sometimes people just don’t have the time. Sometimes people do it to get a reaction.In post 178, Robert2424 wrote:I really shouldn't have to ask people, hence my response before
Ask before you say people refused or don’t say they refused.-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
My list, Using the list from the mod so its in no particular order to be fair to everyone.
Doughboy, an interesting charicter to say the least. He claims me to be defensive when he voted me defending what he calls Naked voting. Witch should be called votes without substance or reasoning. witchs adds nothing to the game. I feel he could flip either way. Would like to see more in general when it comes to him. Could flip either or, but a slight edge to anti.
Nikk, He can be odd, but I feel he's trying to help the town. I havn't got any bad feelings and nothing he's done seems scummy to me. But its early and things could change drastically.
LolWagons, A person with allot of character behind him. I feel he's one of the most active if not the most active poster here. He has a feel of town, or he's just wearing a mask.
Trivium, the one who a wagon formed on with no substance or reasoning. I have to wondering if the wagon was on him from a prior game. The wagon on him is hard to read, mainly because it had no substance to it. Hence why I highlighted it. I do feel theres a fair chance Scum was on the wagon at least, if not good chance though. As for him, I'm leaning town because of the wagon. I don't have a good read on him tbh.
Wagonomics, A very roleplaying person, who makes his posts interesting to read. Hard to get a read on because of it. Must watch in the future.
Egix96, My notes on him are very small, but seems to be trying to add substance. Feeling town for now.
profii, Hard to say tbh. I feel he's jumped around a bit everywhere, but I feel he's only trying to get feel for everyone. Could flip either or.
Sashaddin, feel he's finnaly came out to contribute or at least seems so. I could of forgotten something. I really can't put him in either catagory atm.
Robert2424, crazy I know, I put myself on the list. I know I'm town, and wish I was more active in the game, I do feel I'm learning though with new terms and new situations.
xwing, I would put him leaning towards anti, What I have seen from this one is less then convincing, but hard to say cause hasn't posted because of being away, witch people are saying is an excuse. worth watching closely.
TheGoldenParadox, Believe it or not, I having a town feeling. Trying to get substance out of every player. but I need to write more notes on him.
Flubbernugget, not much on him, want to see allot more and bigger posts from him.
Lapsa, you would be the bottom of the list, you remind me of another player who doesn't really add anything to the game. From odd explanations to sometimes out right ignoring some of my questions, I have to lean scum with you. though if you somehow flip town, you've proven to be a distraction. I can't really find a post that feels town either. Hince why my vote is here, plus you were late on the no substance wagon as I like to call it. However, do I think you should be lynched D1? Its a hard question.-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
I wanted more explanation on you FOS on Nikk. It looks odd and out of place.In post 246, Lapsa wrote:
I have answered all your questionsIn post 245, Robert2424 wrote:From odd explanations to sometimes out right ignoring some of my questions
I'll look up exactly what I'm talking about here and qoute it. You've been defending your "naked voting" along with everyone elses this entire time. Hence I've called your defensive, and consider your vote part of your defensiveness. dose it mean it makes you scum, no but I find it a bit scummy.In post 247, Doughboy wrote:
Easy on that shade. It’s not my color. I never called you defensive. You essentially called me defensive but I have no idea why you think that. Mind explain how I’ve been defensive?In post 245, Robert2424 wrote:Doughboy, an interesting charicter to say the least. He claims me to be defensive when he voted me defending what he calls Naked voting
Side note being defensive isn’t alignment indicative but since he brought it up, he should at least be able to explain/show how I’ve been.
That may be wrong, adjusting my notes.In post 248, Lapsa wrote:@robert how is post 17 late?
If it was a "lolwagon", it didn't turn into one after all those people jumped in on him.In post 249, Doughboy wrote:I find it hard to believe Robert from 2012 has never seen a lolwagon. Hell we have a player named after them. lol wagons happen in rvs and that’s what took place. I appreciate his attempt to look at the wagon for scum, however I feel if he were town he’d try to converse more with the naked voters. I don’t even think he said anything about the fact that he called out naked voters and then I intentionally naked vote. I don’t see any sort of curiosity coming from him, which probably means he’s more informed than I.
Hence, my highlight of that vote train. Witch has stemmed all these issues.-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
ah it wasn't dough. still don't see how I've been defensive on it.In post 223, profii wrote:
dunno if id call him a liar BUT I do find him scummy...In post 216, Doughboy wrote:@profli. Thoughts on Robert and him lying?
firstly it's hilarious that TGP called him potentially "cunning scum" and Robert says hey thanks for calling me cunning as if to slip "yes I'm scum I'm glad you rate my scum play so highly" sort of thing.
Also further to that, I think his push on the naked voters is low hanging fruit because as scum he cant find a fake push to latch on to so "that will do" - as you said, when i read you 2 in ISO, my first reaction was "just ask the reasons if you dont like the naked vote" but Robert gets needlessly defensive about it
VOTE: Robert-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
I don't really have a problem other then your attitude and some of the stuff you've said so far. I don't hate you or anything, just don't like your posts from what I've seen so far from me. Its day 1, so in the event that neither of us are lynched, day 1 will likely amount to just reads and feels, unless there is a lynch.In post 258, Lapsa wrote:
gave you my explanation pretty much instantly on #233. repeatedly on #237In post 255, Robert2424 wrote:
I wanted more explanation on you FOS on Nikk. It looks odd and out of place.In post 246, Lapsa wrote:
I have answered all your questionsIn post 245, Robert2424 wrote:From odd explanations to sometimes out right ignoring some of my questions
and was catching up with the thread
@robert what is your problem with me?-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
What?In post 270, Lapsa wrote:that's a full dollar-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
you may need to read again. Lapsa, xwing, and barely DB made my scum reads.
seems Golden is at L-2, its a bit surprising to me. While I find sometimes his posts odd, he is at least asking questions. While he could flip scum, I'm more comfortable with a Lapsa lynch. I feel Lapsa has done allot less substance then Golden, and done some shady shit as well.-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
lol, cause if I were to do so, would be a great idea. Since somehow people have already "linked me" with Golden somehow, thinking I somehow care if he got lynched. It won't hurt my feelings, I just think there a more scummy person, unless you have reasons not to vote for Lapsa?In post 311, Doughboy wrote:Defending your scum buddy?-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
there you are! you've been gone qwite awhile.
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
salty. I guess you really don't like me, or did I figure out the scum team already? Best to try to eliminate me during a lol d1 lynch then shoot me at night.In post 319, Lapsa wrote:eat me
@LB, wasn't a lie, I do feel people not providing reasoning for there vote is unwilling. Unless they expect us to read there minds.-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
I would disagree. But at least you agree Lapsa hasn't done anything townish.In post 342, LolWagons wrote:
In the slightestIn post 341, Doughboy wrote:
You haven’t shown any town either.In post 340, Robert2424 wrote:I actually do have a case on Lapsa. Lapsa has yet to show any town in the slightest.
Course I'm waiting for someone to try to convince me to vote for golden.
Scum is always looking for town cred. I just say things how it is. Some people might not like it, I'm not looking to win a popularity contest. I'm looking to lynch scum.In post 352, xwing wrote:
^slight townie points to robert for the star wars reference..In post 178, Robert2424 wrote:[snip]
Riding in a Xwing sounds fun and all, but I'd rather fly an Awing. *cue star wars music*.
kidding aside, slight town points for wanting to push for his own read instead of sheeping..
additional town points for robert since GP (my scumlean) called him an eager townie..In post 178, Robert2424 wrote:In post 150, TheGoldenParadox wrote:I see where you're coming from, but right now Robert is more "overeager town" than "cunning scum" in my eyes.
[snip]
^db is town..In post 184, Doughboy wrote: You do if you want to know why they voted. You can’t say people refused to provide reasons just because they didn’t give one. Sometimes it’s good to not give a reason. Sometimes people just don’t have the time. Sometimes people do it to get a reaction.
Ask before you say people refused or don’t say they refused.
@robert: i'd be careful with your line of reasoning on "post only when you have time" plus "always explain yourself"..did could be used by scum to their advantage to appear townie..In post 205, Robert2424 wrote:
If they don't have time, don't post. I only posts when I'm not at work and on my home computer. If they are going for reactions, they are just putting unneeded spotlight on themself. I don't see why you need to defend naked voting so much.In post 184, Doughboy wrote:
You do if you want to know why they voted. You can’t say people refused to provide reasons just because they didn’t give one. Sometimes it’s good to not give a reason. Sometimes people just don’t have the time. Sometimes people do it to get a reaction.In post 178, Robert2424 wrote:I really shouldn't have to ask people, hence my response before
Ask before you say people refused or don’t say they refused.
im fine with either gp or lapsa lynch for D1..In post 206, LolWagons wrote:
Yup.In post 204, Nikk wrote:
I mean 115 literally describes 117 and 118.In post 202, LolWagons wrote:#113-#118 (they aren't all his, but that window) in his ISO...I mean, that's bad.
So don't discount the Lapsa lynch. I have the opposite stance of you. GP barely a better push than Lapsa. Need more from both.
let's move this along please..
^sasha is town..In post 225, Sashaddin wrote:
Sorry dude. I did not think of the consequences as deep as you did. How does it help town? (Not a trick question, I just want to be educated)In post 210, LolWagons wrote:Well I was hoping no one would specifically point that piece out because if people want to think there's a cop when there's not, that would typically benefit town, but you went and blew it.
At this point, I can see db, lapsa, xwing on a team together, could take sashi in one of the slots, but oddly enough I do get some town vibes from him. Course then idk. Xwing is coming up with odd certainty's. Its worthy noting and seeing if he/she expands on it.
@xwing, so your saying if I'm scum, lapsa would be town, but not if lapsa is scum I'm town?-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
right. I'm seeing a pattern.In post 364, Doughboy wrote:
I wasn’t agreeing with youIn post 362, Robert2424 wrote:I would disagree. But at least you agree Lapsa hasn't done anything townish.-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
Snow Leopard.
I'm going to have to reread here, some peoples reasoning confuses me. Like for an example, laspa unvote, Wagonomics putting me so low while 3 people were voting for me.
to me, Golden could flip either way, though I would prefer laspa. Wagonomics seems willing to hammer golden.
Everyone seems in favor of a lynch, except Lapsa. so unless somebody jumps on Lapsa still, witch I don't think is very likely, Golden seems to be the person for today.
So the question is would I want to hammer Golden myself. I put in an earlier post somebody to try to convince me to vote for him, but nobody seemed to notice or care. So I have to wonder, who would people want to have hammer him?-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
Did you really claim cop for no reason?
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
don't get the term? lol. Even if he was to be a cop, doesn't make me any less town.In post 520, profii wrote:You’re brown bread tomorrow mate!
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
actually, I'm not seeing it.In post 546, LolWagons wrote:
We’ve reached consensus already. Go look at the first few votes of Profiis iso. He’s a double voter.In post 545, Wagonomics wrote:
I don't think a Profii investment goes through today. Would you like to invest in EgixCoin?In post 540, TheGoldenParadox wrote:Slight scumlean on egix, neutral on db.-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
In post 57, profii wrote:
Are you saying that both scum naked voted on a lol wagon?In post 56, Nikk wrote:
Either works.In post 53, LolWagons wrote:
Why flubbernugget and not Dough?In post 50, Nikk wrote:
People are just acting outside of the interest of the town (quick wagon, naked votes) to stir up conversation? To x's credit they did jump right in and ask good questions.In post 49, Trivium wrote:It's just a thing people are doing to get talking to happen.
VOTE: FlubbernuggetIn post 73, profii wrote:like in the last game when we got BEF it was hard to get the wagon over the line, so, let's assume the rush on triv was fully town...there were a few players who had already objected by the time i posted... so if the players i specifically asked (The undeclared) all kinda came out and went 'Eh why not, im not against it'
you could speculate that the rushers were town, the questioned were town and we hit a scum and found the objectors as his buddies.
I'm oversimplifying a complicated game, but i think there was a general mix of for and against anyway. I think we will have 1 scum for and 2 scum against and triv will be town- thats my guess. idk whoIn post 223, profii wrote:
dunno if id call him a liar BUT I do find him scummy...In post 216, Doughboy wrote:@profli. Thoughts on Robert and him lying?
firstly it's hilarious that TGP called him potentially "cunning scum" and Robert says hey thanks for calling me cunning as if to slip "yes I'm scum I'm glad you rate my scum play so highly" sort of thing.
Also further to that, I think his push on the naked voters is low hanging fruit because as scum he cant find a fake push to latch on to so "that will do" - as you said, when i read you 2 in ISO, my first reaction was "just ask the reasons if you dont like the naked vote" but Robert gets needlessly defensive about it
VOTE: Robert-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
A lyncher? I certainally hope a role isn't in this game....In post 579, LolWagons wrote:Is that hammer? I was lyncher, TGP was my target. I win right?-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
Well, I'm not young, being 27 years old (At least younger then probally most people here) and in the Air Force. If your trying to get me to react to your "I'm going cop you Robert", well, I'm waiting, oh wait, there is no cop. I didn't say anything incase scum didn't read those details and tried to kill you for it. If your wanting me to RC, I'll wait to vote count or closer.In post 607, profii wrote:In post 592, schadd_ wrote:[tubular bells]
japanese breakfast - here come the tubular bells
d1 final vote count
TheGoldenParadox (7):Trivium, LolWagons, Egix96, xwing, Nikk, profii, Robert2424
Robert2424 (2):Doughboy, Flubbernugget
Lapsa (1):Sashaddin
profii (1):TheGoldenParadox
Egix96 (1):Wagonomics
not voting (1):Lapsa
with 13 alive, it took 7 to lynch.any thing to say young Robert?
When it became clear Wagonomics wasn't going to commit to the Golden lynch, gave me the confidence that Golden might be scum then. He did flip scum and we are in a decent spot. I'll admit, I was wrong on my initial read on Golden, and others were right all along. Now we have allot to work with compared to yesterday. Wagonomics unwillingness to hammer Golden like he said seems like a bad attempt to lull people into thinking the wagon was going to happen and during the holidays nobody getting back on to finish off the wagon. However, I love to play mafia, so I was planning on checking in frequently.
Lapsa and Wagonomics were unwilling to jump on the golden wagon. Golden was unwilling to jump on the Lapsa wagon. I mean, there no logical sense in Golden doing that. As much as Lapsa going to just say I'm shading him, its facts. I wouldn't be surprised if Lapsa and Wagonomics are the scum team. Though Profili was on Trivium list, he just seems agressive, but I guess he could be end up part of the scum team as well.
Vote Wagonomics
Our most logical route is following peoples unwillingness, starting with his play yesterday.-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
I doubt he will.In post 686, Trivium wrote:Lol guys that's not a hammer pay attention. I just had a long day and I want more scum dead. Lapsa better intent before I wake up or I'm going to have a stroke-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
-
-
Robert2424 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 561
- Joined: November 11, 2012
- Location: Denver, Co
Reason/s