Mini 2049: The Townsquare Game Over

themilkcartonkid · Post Post #125 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 3:32 pm

—

In post 123, DuckDuckJab wrote:VOTE: Thor

@milky, if there is no NK we should look at a50
Realistically it's such a a dense slip it's more likely to come from another game than acrually come from scum (A50 is also good scum )

@cheeky why robert and not thor?

themilkcartonkid · Post Post #126 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 3:32 pm

Accidental quote. Mobile

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #127 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 3:34 pm

In post 125, themilkcartonkid wrote:@cheeky why robert and not thor?

I don't get why he's fixated on his defense when people were largely moving in other directions. Seems he's more concerned with his appearance than finding scum.

themilkcartonkid · Post Post #128 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 3:39 pm

Mm okay. I like you for town. I'll bite. VOTE: robert

themilkcartonkid · Post Post #129 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 3:45 pm

Though, last time I pushed a newer players weak post it was the cop so fingers crossed this time

Soviet Crocolisk · Post Post #130 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 3:56 pm

Robert does seem defensive with his post but I feel it's rather honest. It's day one, so it can be pretty intimidating for newer players to vote when they know no one. I think this as either a town or scum read.

I'm going to

VOTE: CHEEKY

for punching down.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #131 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 3:57 pm

Ducky why are you voting so much

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #132 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 3:59 pm

In post 130, Soviet Crocolisk wrote:Robert does seem defensive with his post but I feel it's rather honest. It's day one, so it can be pretty intimidating for newer players to vote when they know no one. I think this as either a town or scum read.

I'm going to
VOTE: CHEEKY
for punching down.

This is your first post of the game. Do you have any other reads? How much have you read?

Soviet Crocolisk · Post Post #133 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 4:22 pm

No other scummy reads so far.
I feel like your vote on a easy low hanging fruit, and that's pretty scummy.

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #134 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 4:28 pm

In post 133, Soviet Crocolisk wrote:No other scummy reads so far.
I feel like your vote on a easy low hanging fruit, and that's pretty scummy.

That's fine I'm not bothered with your read on me. Just more curious about why you've decided to interject at this point with nothing else to comment on.

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #135 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 4:40 pm

In post 133, Soviet Crocolisk wrote:No other scummy reads so far.
I feel like your vote on a easy low hanging fruit, and that's pretty scummy.

Actually I would like you to elaborate on this.

It seems you're pretty sure Robert is town by calling him low hanging fruit. Can you explain this?

Based on my voting behaviour so far this game, why is my vote on Robert in particular bothering you?

Last, why is voting low hanging fruit scummy early game? Do you think it's realistic to believe that he is going to be the lynch today?

Soviet Crocolisk · Post Post #136 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 4:45 pm

Weekends been busy and I didn't have any witty one liners planned for the pre.

What are your other reads so far and explain what do you mean by Robert acting defensive while everyone else is heading other directions?

Soviet Crocolisk · Post Post #137 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 5:00 pm

In post 135, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 133, Soviet Crocolisk wrote:No other scummy reads so far.
I feel like your vote on a easy low hanging fruit, and that's pretty scummy.
Actually I would like you to elaborate on this.

It seems you're pretty sure Robert is town by calling him low hanging fruit. Can you explain this?

Based on my voting behaviour so far this game, why is my vote on Robert in particular bothering you?

Last, why is voting low hanging fruit scummy early game? Do you think it's realistic to believe that he is going to be the lynch today?

He's low hanging fruit because he seems like an easy vote to park on. Why do you think I think he's town?

This vote caught me because you're leading it with a basis I thought was scummy.

Because it's too easy and low risk. And no.

DuckDuckJab · Post Post #138 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 5:10 pm

In post 130, Soviet Crocolisk wrote:Robert does seem defensive with his post but I feel it's rather honest. It's day one, so it can be pretty intimidating for newer players to vote when they know no one. I think this as either a town or scum read.

I'm going to
VOTE: CHEEKY
for punching down.

What does this post even mean fam

Gamma Emerald wrote:Ducky why are you voting so much

I'm in the mood for it

~ tw

DuckDuckJab · Post Post #139 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 5:21 pm

In post 133, Soviet Crocolisk wrote:No other scummy reads so far.
I feel like your vote on a easy low hanging fruit, and that's pretty scummy.

Who's town?
does LHF have to be a mislynch? why else would someone vote LHF? you're not reasoning through anything

~ tw

Soviet Crocolisk · Post Post #140 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 6:33 pm

DuckDuckJab wrote: Who's town?

Me

In post 139, DuckDuckJab wrote:why else would someone vote LHF?

To mislead (assuming Robert is town) and pad appearances to look town.

If I have to pick to pressure between either Robert and Cheeky, I want to pick the more vocal one.

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #141 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 6:35 pm

In post 137, Soviet Crocolisk wrote:He's low hanging fruit because he seems like an easy vote to park on. Why do you think I think he's town?

Ok well does it make sense to accuse me of vote parking seeing as it is my 4th vote of the game? If I did just vote him and tune out I'd see where you're coming from but this accusation makes no sense.

Would it be scummy to vote low hanging fruit if they are scum? It wouldn't make sense for you to defend him if you thought he were scum, therefore the opposite must be true. Seeing as I've played scum a few times I think it would be more reasonable to say that scum would be more weary of pushing votes onto lynchbait.

In post 137, Soviet Crocolisk wrote:Because it's too easy and low risk. And no.

In a vacuum sure, but you've taken one action out of context of my play today, which is far from low risk overall. It is easy but I don't see how that's scum indicative. If you don't believe that the lynch will go through then your whole argument falls apart.

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #142 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 6:40 pm

In post 136, Soviet Crocolisk wrote:Weekends been busy and I didn't have any witty one liners planned for the pre.

What are your other reads so far and explain what do you mean by Robert acting defensive while everyone else is heading other directions?

I'm not going to answer this because you can answer these yourself if you're actually paying attention to the game.

Soviet Crocolisk · Post Post #143 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 6:53 pm

You're getting pretty defensive after my vote. Scratch my intentions, most of your answers were focused on redirecting attention to pedantics. You also avoided explaining your post about Robert

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #144 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 7:07 pm

In post 143, Soviet Crocolisk wrote:You're getting pretty defensive after my vote. Scratch my intentions, most of your answers were focused on redirecting attention to pedantics. You also avoided explaining your post about Robert

Oh lol. Yeah Defensive is when I point out your push on me is garbage - rather than seeing where you've gone wrong and can continue to pile outdated surface level scum tells onto me.

CheekyTeeky · Post Post #145 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 7:08 pm

You* not and.

Soviet Crocolisk · Post Post #146 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 7:26 pm

Mm, that's fine. I think your thoroughly offended tone is genuine and I don't think that's sunny

Unvote:

Soviet Crocolisk · Post Post #147 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 7:27 pm

Scummy*

Jingle · Post Post #148 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:13 pm

To pagetop or not to pagetop.

Jingle · Post Post #149 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 8:14 pm

That is the question.