In post 190, Thor665 wrote:@Skitter - I fail to see that as an argument convincing enough to not warrant poking at Cheeky to get reads. if you do, then continue to do nothing with such tells, I'm much more active and aggressive and consider it superior play.
i mean, again, i didn't say that you shouldn't poke her over it; you're free to get reads however you like; i'm saying that i disagree with your opinion there
==
In post 193, Almost50 wrote:
Check the games I linked. I could go dig up more, but these two were recent enough. NEVER underestimate Thor's scum game.
ok, let's assume that i don't have the time or patience rn to metadive him - explain what about those games makes you think he's scum here
is it just that you think his reasoning is shallow?
==
In post 200, DarkLightA wrote:In previous equivalent games he's actually efforted with sensible output, but on the other hand he's had a 3 year break from the site (and he has like 150 posts total) so there's only so much to be dug from there.
have you played with him prior to his break from the site?
In post 200, DarkLightA wrote:...which is on page 1-2. This doesn't even need commenting. If DDJ is this good at creating things out of nothing he should consider taking up a career as a magician. And then on top of that he uses a pet peeve to justify a scum case?
i thought your vote/unvote there in rvs were kinda townie, as i explained previously.
i disagree with ddj's (buj's) reasoning for it being a reason to scumread you, but i do think that it's entirely possible to find things to read in rvs to get the game moving.
so, while yes it's reachy, i liked how buj approached it and started forming reads; i don't really mind reachy reads in rvs; that was the main post i liked from ddj
==
In post 203, Robert2424 wrote:Cheeky seem too...go with the flow. Course she may normally be like this.
Vote Cheeky
i mean why do you think it's scum-indicative for her to go with the flow?
i don't really like that you use it as a reason to vote her but then kinda handwave how much validity the point has by saying she just may normally be like this
==
In post 235, Robert2424 wrote:Mainly my reason for saying it. but before somebody takes it out of context, I just didn't like the posts.
i'm not entirely following what you odn't like here
==
In post 211, CheekyTeeky wrote:{Gamma Emerald, joges}
{Trivium, Thor, Milk}
{Skitter, A50, Lady, Robert}
{}
{DLA or DDJ, Soviet}
i feel pretty decent about town!dla for this stage of the game actually; why is he on your bottom tier?
can you talk about how you're reading gamma? i'm awful at reading him and i don't feel like he's done much ai yet
==
fair enough, fair enough; i can give it some more time; more kinda just like noting it for myself now