I'm sorry to keep pestering you, but can you please go a little further than this?
"I believe that DE is either strong town or active scum because..."
I'm sorry to keep pestering you, but can you please go a little further than this?
Making reads and analyzing posts is what a strong town does. However, many experienced players actually emulate this play as scum and do it naturally as town, resulting in making them hard to read without many posts or some other information (claimed inspects and flips). There were three players who exemplified this in my home community named hawkie, Darnell, and justinsmom, all of which had scum plays very similar to their town plays and were strong as both factions.In post 79, u r a person 2 wrote:Mate, I know it must have been a little rough being scum read right away, but it feels like since then you've become more reserved in how you're answering questions. I think you're town, and we're going to need to work together and i'm trying to get you to be a little more free flowing with your comments. never know what diamond you might unearth, or what little comment inspires a thought process in someone else that leads to them solving the game
Well isn't this an imitation.In post 31, foodcoats wrote:URAP2, do you believe there is inconsistency between Scantius aggressively threatening to lynch Yyotta and arguing against our wagon on saad? Do you believe this is scum-indicative?In post 23, u r a person 2 wrote:From everyone's entrances so far, I wouldn't have expected you to be the one worrying about pressuring people early.
Could you please explain the thought process behind this post?
Interesting. I'm going to think about whether I agree with this.In post 84, Scantius wrote:No; scum would most likely bandwagon in this case.
Here, he says he finds a Scantius post scummy, but overall his posts are NAI, but also the power of the initial RVS vote leans town? That's three totally disjointed reads on one player in three sentences, I don't follow the thought process and it doesn't feel natural. Seems like he's trying to be as flexible as possible with how he wants to read Scantius later.In post 51, foodcoats wrote:Not much. We don't have a lot to go on at the moment. I do find this a little scummy:In post 43, u r a person 2 wrote:@FC what do you think about scantius?
Town needs to apply pressure to get better reads, and the scum will come along with that strategy in order to make themselves appear to be town. It's largely an irrelevant statement, but I feel it is a bit of an apologetic for doing nothing. But that said, I overall feel like Scantius's posts so far are NAI, and the power of the flavour on the Yyotta vote actually leans town for me.In post 20, Scantius wrote:I would like to point out that pressure can be an effective way to scumhunt but can also be an easy way for scum to appear to scumhunt.
may be just tone clash on my part here but this section feels like he wants to paint Dongempire in a negative light more than actually engage with him. The way he says "I'm interested" twice in a row feels stiff - like he's justifying what he's doing to the rest of us instead of talking directly to Dongempire - and altogether it gives me an over-explainy vibe.In post 51, foodcoats wrote: I'm personally more interested in Dongempire's answers to my questions at this point. It's criticism of Scantius was wishy-washy and shady with no follow-through. I'm interested to see what Dong has to say about that, especially an explanation as to why it did not move its vote somewhere more interesting when it seems to believe that wagoning is beneficial to town.
My comment about the Yyotta vote was specifically about this:In post 89, GuiltyLion wrote: Here, he says he finds a Scantius post scummy, but overall his posts are NAI, but also the power of the initial RVS vote leans town? That's three totally disjointed reads on one player in three sentences, I don't follow the thought process and it doesn't feel natural. Seems like he's trying to be as flexible as possible with how he wants to read Scantius later.
I don't think scum!Scantius uses this much vehemence in a random vote. I'm usually a trends reader, but I have to go into the weeds a bit here as there's not much to go on. (I know they posted a bunch in the night so I'll have to go back and do a proper ISO.)
I think my line on Dongempire is similar to the one you're taking on me. Dong keeps all the options open regarding Scantius here. It pings me that Dong would bother to shade Scantius...In post 89, GuiltyLion wrote:may be just tone clash on my part here but this section feels like he wants to paint Dongempire in a negative light more than actually engage with him. The way he says "I'm interested" twice in a row feels stiff - like he's justifying what he's doing to the rest of us instead of talking directly to Dongempire - and altogether it gives me an over-explainy vibe.In post 51, foodcoats wrote: I'm personally more interested in Dongempire's answers to my questions at this point. It's criticism of Scantius was wishy-washy and shady with no follow-through. I'm interested to see what Dong has to say about that, especially an explanation as to why it did not move its vote somewhere more interesting when it seems to believe that wagoning is beneficial to town.
foodcoats - why is scum!Dongempire more likely not to move his vote "somewhere more interesting" than town!Dongempire?
It is beneficial to town. I wasnt able to put too much thoight into thr thread because i was ill, so i skimmed over and gave my thoughts. I wasnt suspicious of scan, so i didnt bother wagoning what i believed to be a dead end. In case you are wondering, i believe he is town from his posts. I just wanted an explanation for 22.In post 51, foodcoats wrote:Not much. We don't have a lot to go on at the moment. I do find this a little scummy:In post 43, u r a person 2 wrote:@FC what do you think about scantius?
Town needs to apply pressure to get better reads, and the scum will come along with that strategy in order to make themselves appear to be town. It's largely an irrelevant statement, but I feel it is a bit of an apologetic for doing nothing. But that said, I overall feel like Scantius's posts so far are NAI, and the power of the flavour on the Yyotta vote actually leans town for me.In post 20, Scantius wrote:I would like to point out that pressure can be an effective way to scumhunt but can also be an easy way for scum to appear to scumhunt.
, have you played with Yyotta before? Did that influence your vote on her?@Scantius
I'm personally more interested in Dongempire's answers to my questions at this point. It's criticism of Scantius was wishy-washy and shady with no follow-through. I'm interested to see what Dong has to say about that, especially an explanation as to why it did not move its vote somewhere more interesting when it seems to believe that wagoning is beneficial to town.
VOTE: Dongempire
That's interesting. Why? So far Yyotta's play is more or less flipped from our last game with her, and is more in line with what I read of her play in other games where she was town. Do you think scum!Yyotta learned from newbie 1905 and is being overly active in response to being lynched for lurking? Are there specific pieces of Yyotta's ISO that strike you as scummy?In post 86, u r a person 2 wrote: On another note, I'm going to push hard to lynch yyotta at end of day if her play is consistent.
I'd like to hear more about this read, URAP. I definitely think GL's attack on me is townie, but your post came before that. One of the things I struggled with last game was teasing apart the IC role from actual alignment. Do you actually townread GL or are you more afraid of a mislynch on a good player?In post 82, u r a person 2 wrote:I agree with you on GL. I think he's projecting town, and I respect his game enough that I'm wary of being mislead.
I feel like Scantius has said a fair bit to defend his position and in debate with you. Are you saying you think his posts aren't saying anything substantial? Otherwise I don't exactly understand this post by you.In post 85, YyottaCat wrote:Scantius, remember that saying nothing is very dangerous
I'm curious to know what you mean by the plan of the vote. Can you explain this more? Do you think there is a specific strategy or something that town should use to vote?In post 60, YyottaCat wrote:I can't tell you right now, as it will make you aware and the plan of the vote will fail.In post 59, Scantius wrote:Then explain. You've been avoiding this.In post 58, YyottaCat wrote:Obviously you would scumread on me, Scantius, just what I expected. You are far from knowing the point of the vote.
I'm interested to hear more from you Elements, so I'm going to ask you some questions someone asked me during my first game of forum mafia... I'm also happy to give my answers if that helps!In post 14, Elements wrote:Also why have people started random voting while we still have over 9 days