Good pointIn post 152, rb wrote:actually i really hate this
it's just the 3 least active players
one is VLA, one just replaced in, one joined the game late
VOTE: DVa
back to this, lamees can wait for now
Looks w/w with AuroIn post 170, DVa wrote:Auro is doing like a LOT more questions than he was like in one of our previous towngames where he was more assertive a bit early on, but that could in large part having to do with this list being... gnomic and oblique so far. So he does feel a touch more reactive here but I don't know I'd call him scum for it yet
-_-In post 197, Something_Smart wrote:I seem to recall liking NotNova although I can't remember why off the top of my head.
I sorta disagree it looks genuineIn post 199, Something_Smart wrote:Well after checking it seems he only has three posts so I might have just been misremembering,but 76 does read as pretty genuine.
Well, sucksIn post 225, Malakitty wrote:I have been in a game with lamee where I read her as scum right off the bat. She hammered me ; I made her scum slip and she went unlynched and won the game
Scum still usually tends to look bad when hammering or L-1ingIn post 232, Lamees wrote:Hammering a town player is not a scum slip lol.In post 225, Malakitty wrote:I have been in a game with lamee where I read her as scum right off the bat. She hammered me ; I made her scum slip and she went unlynched and won the game
I'm probably just not liking this rb v Lamee catfightIn post 250, Something_Smart wrote:I thought the blatant self-contradiction in 233 was towny but also 240 reads like trying too hard to be flippant...
Woops, I missed this. Now I am confident Thor is town.In post 212, Thor665 wrote:Some players do have playstyles that 'feel' anti town or scummy. But that's a long way different from a playstyle that is reactive as opposed to reactive. Scumhunting is an activity - lack of scumhunting is scummy. I'll agree this might lead to players who play very poorly being lynched every game - hopefully it will teach them to not play poorly. I fail to see the issue.
I agree it's important to separate play from playstyle. That said, if a player plays scummy, Day 1 is the optimal time to root them out since apparently you can't discern their alignment from play, no? Are you arguing we should not lynch scummy looking players Day 1? Clearly you're not, because that would be daft - so what is your suggestion of who we lynch Day 1? I submit it is best to lynch someone who looks scummy - and that can include playstyle. You're either right, and huzzah, or you're wrong and you get info. Both are preferable to lynching someone off an inherently bad case, which playstyle is not.
He actually doesn't have a problem with it.In post 259, Auro wrote:What's the problem with this?In post 258, Persivul wrote:<slow clap>In post 212, Thor665 wrote:I'll agree this might lead to players who play very poorly being lynched every game - hopefully it will teach them to not play poorly. I fail to see the issue.
It's annoying but not AI
What GF has to do here? I thought Angel was vengeful, not copIn post 396, Persivul wrote:- Then, scum can't kill her without giving us an investigation leading to a partial clear (partial because GF could be in play)
NoIn post 431, Egix96 wrote:Does anyone else think that rb's most recent posts (from about #339 onward) are very scummy in tone?
What supposed scumslip?Apart from the supposed scumslip, that is?
HehIn post 492, MiniDeathStar wrote:On one side of the inn,
Thor and Auro were flinging heavy words at each other in a heated argument. On the
other side, a small group had formed and was gathering supporters. This time they called
for the death of Lamees, one of the leaders of the militia.
In post 496, Dunnstral wrote:Bad ss, hanging Lamees isn't good play since I'm pretty sure they're town and scum doesn't fake claim that role
In post 497, Dunnstral wrote:I think angel can be blocked by the vampire scum role though - which also feels like a pretty common scum pickup when MS meta is to claim important town power day 1 when it isn't needed. I still think lynching lamees is the wrong call though
In post 476, rb wrote:people who talk setup spec without doing much else are usually scum
In post 513, Something_Smart wrote:If anything, if rb is scum one of the people he mentioned there could be immortal.
???
Oh right, I saw the Immortal rolecard nowIn post 1092, Creature wrote:What GF has to do here? I thought Angel was vengeful, not copIn post 396, Persivul wrote:- Then, scum can't kill her without giving us an investigation leading to a partial clear (partial because GF could be in play)
