this is to page 8 (multi quote actually missed two posts and those will be forgotton to the void)
In post 9, Sickofit1138 wrote:VOTE: Gamma Emerald
Because sister, you're the only familiar name to ne i think
minor town pts to voting familiar faces
In post 27, CheekyTeeky wrote:
I think this is either TvS or SvS.
I dislike both their page 1 posting.
First I don't like Robert saying they'll vote someone until they post - it's a thinly veiled fake pressure vote. Then I don't like the immeadiate unvote after Lady calls him a liar. If he was pressure voting to get the game going why isn't he moving his vote elsewhere to get more people to post? The unvote in this instance is scummy.
Angel is less scummy but I dislike her asking "lynch all liars?" instead of commenting on whether being a liar is AI for Robert.
i like the first half of this
the rest of it isn't reachy but just doesn't make sense. Like the whole idea of lynch all liars is that lying is scummy regardless of who it is.
nani the fuck
In post 46, DuckDuckJab wrote:
I thought getting nightkilled was your favorite thing?
You rolled scum this time?
Thinking Darklight and LA are scum based on first impressions.
-BuJ
why is there no vote attatched to this? doesn't flow with the rest of the post. Might be because hydra.
In post 74, DuckDuckJab wrote:
If someone doesn't make something from nothing, how do we kick off a spicy d1 and kill teh scumz? This will sound silly and I agree Cheeky's post was reachy. there's some parts of it I don't agree with, and bits of it which I think could come from scum -- but not just the fact she's drawing blood from a stone out of rvs. that's town.
For the record if this was her posting on like page 10 I'd agree with you 1000%
~ tw
why would you agree if she made that assertion on page 10 lol
mindblowing how everyone saw that and just ignored it
not that its lynchable
but its just something so ridiculous i would expect town to vote it out of sheer paranoia
In post 99, CheekyTeeky wrote:
-snip-
First, A50 is too smart to make such a slip (of true) and is definitely too smart to then bring further attention to it by walking back his slip. This isn't even WIFOM it is just the kind of analytical player he is. This makes it a townslip.
imagine being smallbrained enough to make a slip. how amateurish. /s
this whole post sucks btw
this vote SUCKS.
In post 107, CheekyTeeky wrote:
-snip-
That's the feeling I got but then I was like...would Jingle put us in a game with no NKs? Unlikely. More likely that Milk is trying to PR hunt
i feel like this is kinda weak. from the perspective of scum!milk i would assume that he already has an idea of whether there's gonna be a night kill, and i doubt that he would be worried about town being informed or something, he would just shoot him at night. what pr could possibly be responsible for no nightkills and still be normal?
this continued push seem towny at all regardless of A50's flip. if this was actually something that pinged gamma that hard, he would have voted as sloon as A50 made the slip, but he only jumped on after someone else did.
In post 114, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also you used the alt excuse then switched to softing global doc
Switching claims I can see but that’s outside of that purview
this is actually the reverse chronology of the events but the global doc is obviously a joke.
In post 127, CheekyTeeky wrote:
I don't get why he's fixated on his defense when people were largely moving in other directions. Seems he's more concerned with his appearance than finding scum.
i think this a town vote but i also disagree, i think as scum robert would just let it slide.
"he's low hanging fruit because he's low hanging fruit"
this argument is the real low hanging fruit honestly
In post 151, DuckDuckJab wrote:
So you voted her to pressure
Then didn't pressure her
Then unvoted
And didn't pressure anyone else with your vote
what are you doin fam
so we just didn't see that whole last page where cheeky tried to pretend the vote didnt bother her only for her to get all hot and bothered by the vote???
<<<from the future, i remember that after this page there was a whole back and forth as to whether cheeky was under pressure and imma just let you guys know ahead of time that i still stand buy the assertion that she was, as is said above. >>>
In post 172, skitter30 wrote:
i'm not sure this dichotomy actually, like, exists? why do you feel like you have to pick between the two of them?
==
yeah but cheeky i think is like actively playing the game and responded to a push someone made on her while continuing to interact with other people
robert had a meh rvs post; showed up again several pages later to defend it withotu really talking about anything else
her iso has scumhunting content, and his is basically about his rvs psot
i don't think the two things are much the same at all
idk why the idea that you can't push two slots as effectively as you can push one is so strange? opportunity cost y'know?
i also think that robert and cheeky being such radically different examples is kinda ehh? like yeah cheeky has more posts but does that really detract from the fact that they both reacted to an attack. also like i said earlier i think that as scum robert would just let it go.
In post 185, Almost50 wrote: In post 182, Thor665 wrote:He did an interesting slip that might be alingment relevant.
He declared it was an innocent error due to another game he's in.
We can't discuss ongoing games.
We can ask for accounts.
I can do my own research about ongoing games with certain info without needing to discuss them.
He's aware of this and is being oddly cagey in his responses to me - I suspect because he's aware.
Sheep me?
This is a good case on surface level. However, anyone who has seen your scum play in a couple of 2 recent games (including one I saw you from the modding slot) I can see this coming from scum you over town you.
I am referring to:
Overkill 1
And
Welcome To Paris
how is this in anyway a response to the problems thor has? this is such a ridiculous pivot from such a simple argument.
In post 193, Almost50 wrote:
Check the games I linked. I could go dig up more, but these two were recent enough. NEVER underestimate Thor's scum game.
i dont really like this, posting two games as evidence without actually discussing why those games are evidence is like ???
why even bother?
In post 194, Lady Angel wrote:
While I'm curious about the a50 situation myself, I don't particularly like the last two votes here. Gamma stated his displeasure with it, which was fine, but after someone else voted he jumped on with no real issue? I don't believe the "benefit of the doubt" thing he said too much, either, considering that vanished once someone else put a vote on him. Darklight's vote seems even worse, since it's a very blatant bandwagon.
gamma's vote is so much worse because its also a blatant bandwagon but unlike darklight, he's trying to pretend its not. the "benefit of the doubt" thing is utter nonsense, a50 referencing another game is actually probable THE MOST plausible explanation to give in this case, and gamma tries to pretend like its out of this world or inadequate.
