Quote this?In post 872, Nikk wrote:My vote stands. Profli was a key contributor to moving from moving off Robert to Wagon. So if you are saying Robert is narrowly avoiding the noose and this makes him scum wouldn't logically stand to reason to look at who started to push away and onto Wagon?
Sure would!In post 872, Nikk wrote:My vote stands. Profli was a key contributor to moving from moving off Robert to Wagon. So if you are saying Robert is narrowly avoiding the noose and this makes him scum wouldn't logically stand to reason to look at who started to push away and onto Wagon?
I’ve literally seen that go drastically wrongIn post 877, mastina wrote:Sure would!In post 872, Nikk wrote:My vote stands. Profli was a key contributor to moving from moving off Robert to Wagon. So if you are saying Robert is narrowly avoiding the noose and this makes him scum wouldn't logically stand to reason to look at who started to push away and onto Wagon?
...Afteryou lynch Robert.
Not before.
You lynch the fucking scum before you try to lynch the scumbuddy.
624 643 647In post 876, profii wrote:Quote this?In post 872, Nikk wrote:My vote stands. Profli was a key contributor to moving from moving off Robert to Wagon. So if you are saying Robert is narrowly avoiding the noose and this makes him scum wouldn't logically stand to reason to look at who started to push away and onto Wagon?
Saying things aggressively does not equate to saying things correctly.In post 877, mastina wrote:Sure would!
...Afteryou lynch Robert.
Not before.
You lynch the fucking scum before you try to lynch the scumbuddy.
In post 886, profii wrote:I said I’d claim after people considered Mastinas posts as we are both making the same case - there is a soft guilty on you and it’s the way to go - by the time that happened I wasn’t L-1 with intent anymore
Anyway - why are you so desperate to see my role mr role fisher?
Interesting that you leave the final vote in the hands of Sash who voted you yesterday but ok let’s go
Soft guilty? Right, right. I'm here to lynch scum. Yes, referring to Mastina post that is comically silly case against me. 2 people (Mastina (Doughboy), and Lapsa) that have contributed nearly nothing to the game and finally apart of the game when there a possibility to be lynched. There is you quick hammering a townie day 2 before anybody had a chance to unvote him to defend himself. It wasn't much of an argument tbh.In post 887, Egix96 wrote:UNVOTE:
I've read mastina's argument and I agree with it. Even if Rob is a Town Voyeur, that role is still nt much use to us.
Intent to hammer on Robert
Okey dokey thenIn post 891, Nikk wrote:Okay with this hammer.
This was a hammer.In post 885, Robert2424 wrote:Vote profii
L-1
He refuses to claim, probably cause he doesn't have a fake claim to supply. The only person not voting now is sash. So its up to him to make the right decision and lynch the desprete scum.
Will doIn post 897, profii wrote:oh my bad you're on robert in the vc.
well I was a VT - make sure you get Robert tomorrow.