I have no clue, it seems we all are playing the exact same card, and said card is self conflicting.
And at the same time, this "play style" we're currently in has a nice issue where being pushy == lynch.
I propose we try cleaning up the vote slate, and carrying on with actual insights and discussion. Maybe? UNVOTE: we're not getting anywhere
In post 82, moonythedwarf wrote:I have no clue, it seems we all are playing the exact same card, and said card is self conflicting.
And at the same time, this "play style" we're currently in has a nice issue where being pushy == lynch.
I propose we try cleaning up the vote slate, and carrying on with actual insights and discussion. Maybe? UNVOTE: we're not getting anywhere
I'm not sure I understand your POV in this post.. I feel like we're definitely getting somewhere, and I'm not sure why being pushy == lynch? In my experience applying squeeze to players and seeing how they react is the best way to tell whether they're lying (scum) or not.
Where does your paranoia about being lynched come from? What would the benefit of a clean vote slate be? Who do you think we should be voting/pressuring, given we can't afford to not vote anyone?
In post 73, moonythedwarf wrote:Voting for being a derp is rude.
Aaaanyways, why are you so insistent on voting me in the first place? Hmm? VOTE: GrandWazoo
OMGUS
In post 79, moonythedwarf wrote:It wasnt really anything important, just a "bah i'm alive and have nothing to add" type post.
This is even worse than 66. Rather than come up with a valuable contribution, or even bothering to pull some weak rationalization out his ass, we get "Bah!"
Moony is either scum or totally useless town. Either way we are better off without him.
In post 79, moonythedwarf wrote:It wasnt really anything important, just a "bah i'm alive and have nothing to add" type post.
This whole exchange was pretty null or maybe slightly town indicative for his GrandWazoo post but the response to me asking for his thoughts about GW was kinda like.. :/ uh
In post 82, moonythedwarf wrote:I have no clue, it seems we all are playing the exact same card, and said card is self conflicting.
And at the same time, this "play style" we're currently in has a nice issue where being pushy == lynch.
I propose we try cleaning up the vote slate, and carrying on with actual insights and discussion. Maybe? UNVOTE: we're not getting anywhere
do you think these comments about playstyles/gamestate are alignment indicative, YellowSnow?
