Still, what one scumbuddy can do to save Thor other than looking bad?In post 1621, Auro wrote:If Thor's scum and the lack of counterwagon is due to scum lurking, both scum have to be hard lurking so much that they didn't even drop in to cast a vote.
The lurkers prolly contain scum, but "Thor's wagon isn't fishy cos his buddies are lurkers!" isn't so likely.
Oh, it was in response to rb's "i wonder why persivul died honestly"In post 1622, Auro wrote:Really? You said this^, what "reasonable stuff"?In post 1509, Creature wrote:He was one of the players doing reasonable stuff rather than just vomiting walls.
What I was trying to imply was that you playing differently from what I expected based on prior experience was implicative of you being the opposite alignment from the other game.In post 1609, Thor665 wrote:Well, for starters, you didn't explain the meta - you just claimed i'd play different for...some reason?
Non explained meta suggests that either it is made up, or poorly conceived.
What it looked like to me was that you were failing to keep a cool head in the face of suspicion, if that makes sense (does it? idk how to put it into words really)I agree that in these two different situations I reacted to them.
How is being aware I'd potentially be lynched in LyLo different than suggesting the case on me is dumb?
I don't get how that's different play from different alignments.
) but it can't be denied that being scumread as town and being scumread as scum feel different from a psychological standpoint.
Well, if you want to claim it's meta - you could probably *easily* research the question and come back with info on it since I'm pretty sure I have more than one town game for you to use as the entire basis of your meta case on me.In post 1627, Egix96 wrote:I don't think there's much point in me asking if you're like that too (you'd only say you're not
what is this dumb shit for realIn post 1605, Auro wrote:Both the latter I stated were D1 wagons.In post 1602, rb wrote:Day1 wagons
also you were on mala's wagon, but hey good job phrasing it as if there's not a big difference between me starting wagons and you just hopping on them advantageously?
I still want Mala lynched.
So your case is - "Whenever Auro starts/is on a wagon that I'm not on, he's scum because BAD WAGONS, and if he's on a wagon I was on he's scum because it's opportunistic!".
We also have two vacant slots... the only purpose of a vote would be to contribute to a lynch and I don't want a lynch to happen right now.In post 1630, rb wrote:you need to have a vote in play, this is beyond fucking ridiculous that four people are not voting
no it means we get actual wagons with size as opposed to shitty wagons that have more chance of ending in a panic lynch at EOD.In post 1631, Something_Smart wrote:We also have two vacant slots... the only purpose of a vote would be to contribute to a lynch and I don't want a lynch to happen right now.In post 1630, rb wrote:you need to have a vote in play, this is beyond fucking ridiculous that four people are not voting
I would lean the same way, but I don't see why it has to be between those two.In post 1632, rb wrote:if it's between mala and thor i choose this
because one is probably scumIn post 1635, Malakitty wrote:I honestly don’t see why people don’t want to flip one of Auro and thor
I'm not necessarily opposed to Thor. I'd rather flip rb than Auro because an rb scumflip would basically clear Auro.In post 1635, Malakitty wrote:I honestly don’t see why people don’t want to flip one of Auro and thor
wait didnt you scumread thor?In post 1635, Malakitty wrote:I honestly don’t see why people don’t want to flip one of Auro and thor
Which 4?In post 1629, rb wrote:what i think are 4 separate town wagons is opportunistic
Disgusting. So you'd rather we lurk like you?In post 1635, Malakitty wrote:I honestly don’t see why people don’t want to flip one of Auro and thor
I'd say RB or one of the lurkers.In post 1643, Lamees wrote:Who should I smite tonight if I die
