ThinkBill
RinkCall
Shrinktall
VOTE: PinkBall there we go
Chainsaw for my buddy
@Sleepless elaborate on the part about kitcatIn post 31, Sleepless Assassin wrote:I'll get back to you. I gotta ask OJ.In post 27, Invisibility wrote:cultofathena, why are dogs cute?
sleepless assassin, do you think that there's money to be made in smuggling memorabilia?
ofrhz, why did you roll scum?
eyes without a face, why did they stop making honey gold wheaties?
rooroo, what is your favorite shearable animal?
slaxx, should seesaws be banned?
kitcat, do you believe in ghosts?
please answer these questions everyone
___________
Oh God, kitcat still thinks scum don't draw attention.
___________
Pink ball would probably be my second choice for a vote right now.
In post 68, CultOfAthena wrote:Explain what scum motivation you see in Invis' play so far? This reads to me like voting someone just for not liking something that they did. You say that you don't like the amount of effort that he put into his vote – do you think that makes him scum?
You've seemingly indicated that I'm your first choice for a vote. Why? For that matter, why is Pink Ball your second choice?In post 47, Sleepless Assassin wrote:Is this at me? I don't believe that one alignment gets attention more than the other. It depends on the other players, not the player who attention is actually on. "Drawing attention" is a non-tell that new players tend to use as a tell.In post 32, Pink Ball wrote:Because I'm drawing attention? So you caught two scums because of calling attention? Is calling attention only a scum trait, or can town call attention too?
Which comes after 41-44In post 72, Invisibility wrote:did you know that 56 comes after 45In post 71, Slaxx wrote:In post 68, CultOfAthena wrote:Explain what scum motivation you see in Invis' play so far? This reads to me like voting someone just for not liking something that they did. You say that you don't like the amount of effort that he put into his vote – do you think that makes him scum?
You've seemingly indicated that I'm your first choice for a vote. Why? For that matter, why is Pink Ball your second choice?In post 47, Sleepless Assassin wrote:Is this at me? I don't believe that one alignment gets attention more than the other. It depends on the other players, not the player who attention is actually on. "Drawing attention" is a non-tell that new players tend to use as a tell.In post 32, Pink Ball wrote:Because I'm drawing attention? So you caught two scums because of calling attention? Is calling attention only a scum trait, or can town call attention too?
#56 reads like projection. Confused as to how that post doesn’t feel forced to you?
This feels Town imoIn post 67, rooroo wrote:I find this post scummy because it conflates attention-seeking with attention-receiving in order to discount a reasonable early townread and in doing so completely ignores motivation, which is often the primary thing town players are thinking aboutIn post 47, Sleepless Assassin wrote:Is this at me? I don't believe that one alignment gets attention more than the other. It depends on the other players, not the player who attention is actually on. "Drawing attention" is a non-tell that new players tend to use as a tell.
P-editIn post 56, Invisibility wrote:upon rereading this feels like WEIRD
TALKING ABOUT SELF
ROOROO STOP BEING EGOTISTICAL
AAAAAA
but seriously it’s a really forced seeming joke
but i don’t think it leans pinku either way
ok lemme explain so rooroo was like yo let’s make a joke but her subconscious made her do a bad
it’s like a mix of hello fellow townies and feeling weird about talking about scum but not wanting to appear that way
like a less blatant lamist
what was I going to write here
oh yeah I’m confortable with my vote
Scum points to SA for just totally ignoring the same “tell” on the same page as this one. Looks like someone interpreting selectively to fit a narrative.In post 109, Invisibility wrote:i guess i should share i think kitcat sounds the most genuine
i also kinda like slaxx for town BUT IM NOT TELLING YOU WHY so he cant conform his play <=== invisibilityusing the real smrats
lol i meant to spell my name wrong but i spelled it right on accident lmaomaomaoamoamaoma
pedit
UNVOTE:
uh ok
I’m a sucker for a good wagon. Also I think I can sort ofhrZ easier so pressure is best spent there. Still circling SA.In post 124, rooroo wrote:Slaxx why are you voting ofrhz over sa rn?
Who do you suspect?In post 125, Eyes without a face wrote:I have no idea why people are suspecting other people and I feel like I'm in the wrong game. What are you people on about? Do you all know each other from before? I see new accounts but they talk to others back and forth like they already know each other.
ok I checked. kitcat and rooroo are totally new and this is their first game on the site = more confusion.
WhyIn post 132, CultOfAthena wrote:I'm fine with Eyes being town as well for now.
Whatever you read in that regard is wrong.In post 158, Eyes without a face wrote:@invis: are you usually that flip floppy with your vote? and is it just at the start of the game or an all-game-long thing?
ofrhz replace out is odd. not sure why they would do that, but I think I read somewhere that it's against the rules if they were scum, so maybe they're town for that reason?
Lol. Look at his ISO. I needed more. Dude.In post 193, Eragon wrote:Point is, you haven’t tried to sort him.In post 190, Slaxx wrote:126: He hadn’t posted much and I said I have a good handle on reading him. So. How’s that scummy? Seems pretty consistent to me.
And you had voted him and had him as a scumread before this post, so you can’t say “consistent”
If you have a “good handle on reading him” then why didn’t you try reading the posts he made and commenting on them?
My vote was trying to sort him. To pressure him into actually playing.In post 193, Eragon wrote:Point is, you haven’t tried to sort him.In post 190, Slaxx wrote:126: He hadn’t posted much and I said I have a good handle on reading him. So. How’s that scummy? Seems pretty consistent to me.
And you had voted him and had him as a scumread before this post, so you can’t say “consistent”
If you have a “good handle on reading him” then why didn’t you try reading the posts he made and commenting on them?
“3. It’s still a disgusting post” means like nothing.In post 191, Eragon wrote:1. I could be wrong about one or both of your alignmentsIn post 189, Slaxx wrote:Oh Jesus am I gonna have to defend myself pbp?
136: How is it pocketing if we are both your strongest scumreads?
2. NGL I have seen scum “pocket” scum before
3. It’s still a disgusting post
Assigning a motive is literally what everyone who is trying to figure out this game is doing lmfaoIn post 198, Eragon wrote:In post 192, Slaxx wrote:121: I pointed out an inconsistency in play. Also, “shading” by guessing a motive behind a post- isn’t that what we are all doing here? Doesn’t seem like shading.
I didn’t say you didnt point out an inconsistency.
I said you called him scum for something he hasn’t notably “passed” in thread yet and you didn’t know if he was going to comment on it.
It was after the post pinkball made(invisi’s post was) so until he has passed that point in thread you can’t assume that he won’t comment and that he’s scum for that.
Also, I pointed out the fact that the 2 scenarios are different.
Pinkball refuses any information/reads to give and invisible only didn’t fully explain one read.
Big difference there IMO
and I didn’t say guessing a motive
You assigned a motive to his posts, which is what I believe is shading.
That’s what I see, that’s what I think
Lean. Lean isn’t enough to lynch. I want a solid scumread. I mean if I’m 60/40 on him but think a pressure vote can make me 70/30 do I not go for it? Those numbers are arbitrary but help illustrate the point I’m making.In post 203, Eragon wrote:So you had him as a scumlean but needed more to read him???In post 195, Slaxx wrote:Lol. Look at his ISO. I needed more. Dude.In post 193, Eragon wrote:Point is, you haven’t tried to sort him.In post 190, Slaxx wrote:126: He hadn’t posted much and I said I have a good handle on reading him. So. How’s that scummy? Seems pretty consistent to me.
And you had voted him and had him as a scumread before this post, so you can’t say “consistent”
If you have a “good handle on reading him” then why didn’t you try reading the posts he made and commenting on them?
How does that make sense?
Please do explain how the tone was scummy. It was a bad fucking vote.In post 208, Eragon wrote:It’s not the idea that’s bad, it’s the tone.In post 201, Slaxx wrote:#43: Because lynching the most useless player is a low effort vote. It’s an excuse to not discern alignment. Am I wrong here?
As I expressed in the post about it.
You can have a correct idea and a scummy tone
If I ask a question and the poster is addressing issues in a similar area and mine doesn’t get addressed I’m going to follow up before I forget. It was important to me to get the answer.In post 209, Eragon wrote:Ok maybe that’s a bit much yes, but I still think you wait until it’s obvious he doesn’t respond, then ask.In post 204, Slaxx wrote:#49 Are you serious? I didn’t get an answer to my question and SA had posted since then. If anything I should be a townread for the follow up, in means I’m genuinely interested in the answer and not just trying to look busy
Cause there’s a good possiblity he just didn’t reach that point in thread and was still catching up.
But I see it’s not really scummy so point dropped
#58 and #59 seemed a bit rushed and out of place. It was a very weak read. I think later in the game I say I’m more confident on town than scum reads.In post 211, Eragon wrote:The point is why did you have him as a scumlean, not why you voted him.In post 206, Slaxx wrote:Lean. Lean isn’t enough to lynch. I want a solid scumread. I mean if I’m 60/40 on him but think a pressure vote can make me 70/30 do I not go for it? Those numbers are arbitrary but help illustrate the point I’m making.In post 203, Eragon wrote:So you had him as a scumlean but needed more to read him???In post 195, Slaxx wrote:Lol. Look at his ISO. I needed more. Dude.In post 193, Eragon wrote:Point is, you haven’t tried to sort him.In post 190, Slaxx wrote:126: He hadn’t posted much and I said I have a good handle on reading him. So. How’s that scummy? Seems pretty consistent to me.
And you had voted him and had him as a scumread before this post, so you can’t say “consistent”
If you have a “good handle on reading him” then why didn’t you try reading the posts he made and commenting on them?
How does that make sense?
I understand.In post 216, Eragon wrote:In post 212, Slaxx wrote:If I ask a question and the poster is addressing issues in a similar area and mine doesn’t get addressed I’m going to follow up before I forget. It was important to me to get the answer.In post 209, Eragon wrote:Ok maybe that’s a bit much yes, but I still think you wait until it’s obvious he doesn’t respond, then ask.In post 204, Slaxx wrote:#49 Are you serious? I didn’t get an answer to my question and SA had posted since then. If anything I should be a townread for the follow up, in means I’m genuinely interested in the answer and not just trying to look busy
Cause there’s a good possiblity he just didn’t reach that point in thread and was still catching up.
But I see it’s not really scummy so point dropped
And that’s why I said point dropped
Some of my pints might be single-sided becuase I’m trying to catchup and get back into the present so I can form some real-time reads, so I might have missed some perspective.
This is why I actually like stuff like this(the back-and-forth) Becuase it helps point out where I’m being a dumb fuck and makes me give more educated reads.
I don’t know! I feel the same way and had the same thought about time. Obviously time isn’t AI.In post 218, Eragon wrote:Why do you feel it’s out of place to question a naked vote and to call invisible town?In post 215, Slaxx wrote:#58 and #59 seemed a bit rushed and out of place. It was a very weak read. I think later in the game I say I’m more confident on town than scum reads.In post 211, Eragon wrote:The point is why did you have him as a scumlean, not why you voted him.In post 206, Slaxx wrote:Lean. Lean isn’t enough to lynch. I want a solid scumread. I mean if I’m 60/40 on him but think a pressure vote can make me 70/30 do I not go for it? Those numbers are arbitrary but help illustrate the point I’m making.In post 203, Eragon wrote:So you had him as a scumlean but needed more to read him???In post 195, Slaxx wrote:Lol. Look at his ISO. I needed more. Dude.In post 193, Eragon wrote:Point is, you haven’t tried to sort him.In post 190, Slaxx wrote:126: He hadn’t posted much and I said I have a good handle on reading him. So. How’s that scummy? Seems pretty consistent to me.
And you had voted him and had him as a scumread before this post, so you can’t say “consistent”
If you have a “good handle on reading him” then why didn’t you try reading the posts he made and commenting on them?
How does that make sense?
And is rushed neccesarily scummy, or is rushed short on time??
It’s understandable its a weak read, but why did you not give anything for people to go on? Bringing that up earlier would have been fine, and given reasons you actually think ohfhrz is scum instead of seemingly naked pushing him.
In post 184, Eyes without a face wrote:Eragon is town
Invis might be
rooroo & CoA are town leans
1. Eyes without a face
2. Eragon
3. Invisibility
4. rooroo
5. CultOfAthena
--------------------
6. Sleepless Assassin
7. Slaxx
8. kitcat
9. Pink Ball
6-9 are not in any particular order. You can say they are still unsorted by me.
Can you explain 2? The more I look at this the more I really don’t like #2.In post 185, Eyes without a face wrote:VOTE: Slaxx
Reason: Out of my 4 unsorted slots
1- I didn't want to put Pink Ball at L-1 in case he is town.
2- I didn't want to make Assassins an equally competent wagon in case Pink Ball was scum.
3- I don't want it to look like I'm voting kitcat because she's voting me.
Not much I can say about my tone you’re like the third person to bring it up I thinkIn post 251, kitcat wrote:Slaxx, you feel really weird tonally. I'm bad at describing tonal reads (they tend to basically end up somewhere around 'gut') but I guess I should probably mention it and I'll try to figure out why it's bothering me
I just got out of a game where we were both town and it was one of those people you mind meld withIn post 250, kitcat wrote:Why do you think you can sort ofrhz easier?In post 126, Slaxx wrote:I’m a sucker for a good wagon. Also I think I can sort ofhrZ easier so pressure is best spent there. Still circling SA.In post 124, rooroo wrote:Slaxx why are you voting ofrhz over sa rn?