In post 561, the worst wrote:in newbie 1905 u r a person 2 weighed up the options & ended up agreeing with my advice to cop Yyotta night one. he guiltied her.
773 assumes that Junk is trueclaiming. It seems to me that townjunk would be trying to make his case that he's not fakeclaiming rather than just expect everyone to just assume he is telling the truth when there is obviously a possibility of him fakeclaiming. The "they would know for sure I'm town." statement bothers me as a mistatement that town should not make and scum might want to bend the truth to scums advantage.
In post 776, YellowSnow wrote:773 assumes that Junk is trueclaiming. It seems to me that townjunk would be trying to make his case that he's not fakeclaiming rather than just expect everyone to just assume he is telling the truth when there is obviously a possibility of him fakeclaiming. The "they would know for sure I'm town." statement bothers me as a mistatement that town should not make and scum might want to bend the truth to scums advantage.
in the world where junk is the doctor, then scum would know that he is town. I don't follow your argument.
I can also live in the world where the uncc'd doctor is real while also knowing there is a chance the claim is fake.
In post 617, YellowSnow wrote:I'm a little confused by the setup. Does that mean there could potentially be two scum pr's four town prs and three vanillas?
@YS have you played in any completed newbie games?
In post 628, YellowSnow wrote:I've never played it before why would I not know it and how would lying benefit me?
okay I answered the question myself. You had completed two newbie games prior to making these posts. So did you never figure out the setup while playing those games?
In post 705, GrandWazoo wrote:But think about the likelihood of a) one scum targeting TW for the NK; b) town!Junk targeting TW for protection; and c) the other scum roleblocking town!Junk. This highly improbable scenario is exactly what he wants us to believe! Compare that to the likelihood of scum!Junk successfully FC (83.3%). And even if Junk is CC'd by the actual Doc, he probably thinks he can bury that claim in verbiage and hostility, as he has done to town all game.
I feel your paranoia
but is it really so low probability?
if junk is the doctor, then the rb for sure role blocks him
so then it's just a question of whether both scum and junk decide to target TW, and that doesn't seem too unlikely. 25-50% shot of happening considering the gamestate
and the presumption is usually that town won't lie about their role
so in this world from scum perspective, he was almost certainly doctor.
i
is this a continued dumbtell attempt? (i dislike that word. I'm not trying to call you dumb. I'm just wondering if you are faking these questions.)
In post 444, the worst wrote:I kinda want to post-by-post analyse why I am so confused anyone can read Moony right now but those analyses are really annoying and I think the most valid response would be, "ok"
@Junk what do you make of their unvote? How about the way Yyotta is prod-dodging through the game?
also VOTE: computerfan0
this must be a piece of my imagination
And I'm at L-1 now since you weren't voting me before
@u are 2 person no i havent gone back to that post thanks for reminding me, Junk claim happend during day 1 check it, because I feel like that May change how you look at the claim, if the claim was during day 2 the fake claim ia more likely
For how to play with JunkoChan, click on my wiki!
I will inflict you with the pain of a thousand slapping anime girls ~thenewearth
you do know if you kill me that's a one way ticket to execution-ville ~Iprobablysuck
I can't dedicate time to this cuz I'm at work, I'll join in 4 hours
For how to play with JunkoChan, click on my wiki!
I will inflict you with the pain of a thousand slapping anime girls ~thenewearth
you do know if you kill me that's a one way ticket to execution-ville ~Iprobablysuck
In post 138, GuiltyLion wrote:stoking the fires of the mooney wagon is also a brave move as scum if that slot is town. overall he's doing his own thing and doesn't seem particularly concerned with how others are looking at him for it
@GL How brave do you really think it would have been of scum!GW? If you had a green check on me, would you give GW a strong town read?
It's hard for me to answer this, I'm now more open to the idea of GW being scum than I was mid D1 writing that post. short answer is I don't think I'd give him a strong town read no, you being town would make him especially more likely scum
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
In post 795, u r a person 2 wrote:Hey GL, I think I'm voting you here, mate. Any particular reason why I should be town reading you?
VOTE: guilty lion
I'm not scum, which is the most important reason.
I'm more interested in why you're townreading YellowSnow. What in his play says town to you? What's your response to my 307 or 634?
"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"
that's fair. I take that to mean that you still think it would have been brave of scum!gw, but that other factors overshadow any weight that might have. Is that reasonable?
