Mini Normal 2053 [Completed]

Ruby Red · Post Post #625 (ISO) » Thu Jan 17, 2019 1:39 pm

eddie?

Ruby Red · Post Post #626 (ISO) » Thu Jan 17, 2019 1:40 pm

my money's on TTTT scum on the slaxx wagon

Slaxx · Post Post #627 (ISO) » Thu Jan 17, 2019 1:40 pm

In post 626, Ruby Red wrote:my money's on TTTT scum on the slaxx wagon

I’d take that bet.

Ruby Red · Post Post #628 (ISO) » Thu Jan 17, 2019 1:41 pm

In post 621, Slaxx wrote:What TTTT left out of that post was there aren’t any scum games to compare Thespio’s play to.

not on-site

Ruby Red · Post Post #629 (ISO) » Thu Jan 17, 2019 1:41 pm

In post 627, Slaxx wrote:
In post 626, Ruby Red wrote:my money's on TTTT scum on the slaxx wagon
I’d take that bet.

you still have to die first

Slaxx · Post Post #630 (ISO) » Thu Jan 17, 2019 1:43 pm

In post 628, Ruby Red wrote:
In post 621, Slaxx wrote:What TTTT left out of that post was there aren’t any scum games to compare Thespio’s play to.
not on-site

This case is getting profoundly more complex and opaque for me to even attempt to defend against. I still don’t think you’re scum here but I think you just crossed into being ridiculous.

Ruby Red · Post Post #631 (ISO) » Thu Jan 17, 2019 1:43 pm

i crossed into being ridiculous...

by stating a fact.

TTTT · Post Post #632 (ISO) » Thu Jan 17, 2019 2:09 pm

In post 621, Slaxx wrote:What TTTT left out of that post was there aren’t any scum games to compare Thespio’s play to. So this meta read is all about how he’s playing differently than his town meta, not to his scum meta. Given that it’s a binary I understand why people might confound the two being the same, but they really aren’t.

In post 614, TTTT wrote:
In post 603, Alonzo wrote:TTTT how do you read thespio vs slaxxx? Do you agree with rr that thes was scummy?
I wasn't kidding about my meta read on Thespio
go check yourself if you want
this is NOTHING like all of his other games

all of which were town

also Ruby looked inside Thespio's soul
and found his scummy little heart

Slaxx · Post Post #633 (ISO) » Thu Jan 17, 2019 2:10 pm

Sorry TTTT.

Slaxx · Post Post #634 (ISO) » Thu Jan 17, 2019 2:11 pm

In post 631, Ruby Red wrote:i crossed into being ridiculous...

by stating a fact.

By stating a fact I’m pretty sure hasn’t been disclosed before?

I just read through your ISO... where do you reference games offsite anywhere in your posts?

Slaxx · Post Post #635 (ISO) » Thu Jan 17, 2019 2:13 pm

I mean I genuinely could be missing it like I missed TTTTs line but I don’t see it.

Ruby Red · Post Post #636 (ISO) » Thu Jan 17, 2019 2:14 pm

no, i haven't brought it up before. i don't see what's ridiculous about it.

whatever, this isn't a meaningful discussion. i'm just dropping this here.

TTTT · Post Post #637 (ISO) » Thu Jan 17, 2019 2:16 pm

also if you read Ruby more closely you'll see he looked into Thespio's soul
I can't be the only one who realizes this, right?

Slaxx · Post Post #638 (ISO) » Thu Jan 17, 2019 2:16 pm

In post 628, Ruby Red wrote:
In post 621, Slaxx wrote:What TTTT left out of that post was there aren’t any scum games to compare Thespio’s play to.
not on-site

Nooooo

You clearly were alluding to something here

Slaxx · Post Post #639 (ISO) » Thu Jan 17, 2019 2:17 pm

In post 636, Ruby Red wrote:no, i haven't brought it up before. i don't see what's ridiculous about it.

whatever, this isn't a meaningful discussion. i'm just dropping this here.

...

You don’t see what’s ridiculous about making a case on why Thespio’s not town based on town games and then pages later allude to the fact there are off site scum games? And then expect me to drop it when I try to follow that thread?

Slaxx · Post Post #640 (ISO) » Thu Jan 17, 2019 2:24 pm

In post 637, TTTT wrote:also if you read Ruby more closely you'll see he looked into Thespio's soul
I can't be the only one who realizes this, right?

Are you trying to actually say something without saying it here or are you blatantly pontificating on tangential issues?

Alonzo · Post Post #641 (ISO) » Thu Jan 17, 2019 2:33 pm

In post 640, Slaxx wrote:
In post 637, TTTT wrote:also if you read Ruby more closely you'll see he looked into Thespio's soul
I can't be the only one who realizes this, right?
Are you trying to actually say something without saying it here or are you blatantly pontificating on tangential issues?

Pontificating lol
Slaxxx may be scum!

Slaxx · Post Post #642 (ISO) » Thu Jan 17, 2019 2:39 pm

In post 641, Alonzo wrote:
In post 640, Slaxx wrote:
In post 637, TTTT wrote:also if you read Ruby more closely you'll see he looked into Thespio's soul
I can't be the only one who realizes this, right?
Are you trying to actually say something without saying it here or are you blatantly pontificating on tangential issues?
Pontificating lol
Slaxxx may be scum!

Do tell.

TTTT · Post Post #643 (ISO) » Thu Jan 17, 2019 2:55 pm

In post 640, Slaxx wrote:
In post 637, TTTT wrote:also if you read Ruby more closely you'll see he looked into Thespio's soul
I can't be the only one who realizes this, right?
Are you trying to actually say something without saying it here or are you blatantly pontificating on tangential issues?

I guess the first one
also you have the best words

Alonzo · Post Post #644 (ISO) » Thu Jan 17, 2019 3:40 pm

In post 642, Slaxx wrote:
In post 641, Alonzo wrote:
In post 640, Slaxx wrote:
In post 637, TTTT wrote:also if you read Ruby more closely you'll see he looked into Thespio's soul
I can't be the only one who realizes this, right?
Are you trying to actually say something without saying it here or are you blatantly pontificating on tangential issues?
Pontificating lol
Slaxxx may be scum!
Do tell.

Picking on my posts calling them scummy without saying why exactly, followed up by accusing someone of blatant pontification...

Was I ever gonna TR that?

Slaxx · Post Post #645 (ISO) » Thu Jan 17, 2019 3:47 pm

Where did I call your posts scummy?

“Blatant Pontification” was a joke between TTTT from earlier in the thread. He said it was a beautiful euphemism for shitposting so I used it again. Explain why accusing someone of blatant pontification is scummy though. How does that indicate my alignment to you?

Slaxx · Post Post #646 (ISO) » Thu Jan 17, 2019 3:49 pm

Also you said you’d give reads a while back, any new ones since then besides a scumread on the most viable wagon today?

Also if you think I’m scum shouldn’t your vote be on me? I’m nowhere near L-1.

Mumble · Post Post #647 (ISO) » Thu Jan 17, 2019 3:53 pm

UNVOTE:

Couple pages to catch up on.

Mumble · Post Post #648 (ISO) » Thu Jan 17, 2019 3:58 pm

I kind of want to just channel Tchill for today...which is odd for me to think.

Alonzo · Post Post #649 (ISO) » Thu Jan 17, 2019 5:15 pm

In post 645, Slaxx wrote:Where did I call your posts scummy?

“Blatant Pontification” was a joke between TTTT from earlier in the thread. He said it was a beautiful euphemism for shitposting so I used it again. Explain why accusing someone of blatant pontification is scummy though. How does that indicate my alignment to you?

In post 646, Slaxx wrote:Also you said you’d give reads a while back, any new ones since then besides a scumread on the most viable wagon today?

Also if you think I’m scum shouldn’t your vote be on me? I’m nowhere near L-1.

Its a case of mistaken Identity I'm afraid.

I have imagined you talking shit about me earlier in a vague nondescript manner then turning into latter day Shakespeare elsewhere when infact I am just wrong.
I apologize. I have my players confused. Your not the guy I'm looking for.

Carry on>

ID fail aside I'v been reading along since I joined, focused mainly on those I know and skimming those I don't, I have the day tomorrow for some deeper diving, I would like to re read the thread again better informed of which slot became who etc. find out who' said what
I don't feel I'v missed much from those I recognize so far, they've been the apples of my eye here.