No. It is different, and it is different in this:In post 999, RCEnigma wrote:To be fair I outlined Loops read trajectory on you and you dismissed it as him not having an opinion. Yes Muh did the exact same thing even disregarding the vote itself.
muh at one point in the game saw something that gave him a scum read on loopdan and followed up on that with his vote. It looks more town on him for this, because he did not do what so many others did, which is call loopdan scum, but not place their vote on him.
I do not condemn him for seeing an argument he likes and following through. If you do, we have more to talk about than whether or not I'm holding people to a double standard.
What loopdan did is different. From pretty much RVS until I showed up in the game, he exclusively voted someone who someone else had just voted merely two posts before and mirrored their argument on it, from voting muh to MDb, to PvtUrist. I have no problem with finding an argument you like and sticking with it. I do have a problem when it becomes apparent that you have a hard time thinking of a reason for any of your votes, which is what loopdan portrayed.