i don't really townread her tbhIn post 107, NotMySpamAccount wrote:My reaosning was that she's contributing, trying to find scum, and arguing in ways that don't seem too tenuous.
==
do tell about your scumlean on meIn post 109, MaryJoLisa2 wrote:Replying to Skitter here: I read town on everyone with a slight (very slight) scum lean on you. Sorry.
Elements didn't actually say anything that I didn't say as well. We both saw NMSA's post as LAMIST. I just pointed it out to see if he would become defensive. He did not.
and for your second paragraph: you're basically saying your accusation that elements was pushing nmsa as a distraction from himself was a reaction test?
==
i'm sometimes slow to vote day1; it was a random vote and i didn't see much reason to move it honestly; i didn't scumread anyone strongly enoughIn post 130, cbynumber wrote:@skitter you're still voting tall1s as per your first post. Is that to infer you have no scumreads on anyone since your random vote?
==
i'm tending town on all of cbynumber, elements, and nmsa
==
i don't think this is a fair assumption to make; town do scummy and anti-town things all the time - if they didn't, this game would be fairly easy. the trick is to try to figure who's *town* and doing scummy things, and who's *scum* and doing scummy things, which is easier said than doneIn post 131, Elements wrote:In post 129, cbynumber wrote:I don't understand how it helps mafia at all if Elements thinks NMSA is mafia?If you're not helping town, you're probably mafia. I think that is a fair assumption to make.The post is detrimental to town if NMSA is town so there's no reason to do it if they are town. If they are mafia they could be trying to build a wall of inexperience to hide behind - which if successful would help them
basically just because someone did something anti-town that doesn't automatically make them scum
==
are you basically accusing him of lying about being new?In post 137, MaryJoLisa2 wrote:In your past game, 1911, you entered as a replacement mid-game. You're saying that 1911 was your first game ever yet you entered with a very good grasp of the terms and a firm understanding of what's going on and what's expected of you. You came into this game and very confidently declared your reads very shortly after you made your entrance. These are not the behaviors of a newbie. I don't think you're being honest with us.
(and that he's not capable of picking up terms and figuring out what's going on as town?)
i don't get why anything you've described here is scummy or something that he, as town, is unlikely/incapable of doing?
ie i don't get why this warrants a vote
and onwards to your next post - why is being comfortable in *his first game onsite* (ie not this game) belie anything about his alignment here?
i'm probably voting you when i finish catching up and see the vcIn post 152, MaryJoLisa2 wrote:Precisely. This is a newbie game. Salami is either an experienced player pretending to be a newbie (lynch all liars) https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?ti ... _All_Liars, or he's an over-confident, inexperienced player. If the latter is trueIn post 148, Elements wrote:The only may anyone can 100% know who the scum are on day if if they themselves are scumwe should not be swayed by his untrained eye no matter how confident he appears.
Something doesn't feel right with Salami and I'm willing to put off suspicion on Elements until we get Salami figured out. If he's town, he'll leave a nice detailed explanation behind to tell us why we should lynch Elements next.
bolded: what is this? why are you insinuating that he's experienced and lying across two games, and not just that he's quick at catching onto things? you're basically saying that no matter his experience level he shouldn't be trusted and i don't know why you think this really
also where did hte 100% scum thing even come from? he never said that
==
uh please explain why you're voting here
ok new post time