Mafia 73: NEGWLTWWWTKY - Abandoned!


User avatar
Shanba
Shanba
So win
User avatar
User avatar
Shanba
So win
So win
Posts: 4072
Joined: January 3, 2007
Location: Up a Tree

Post Post #2450 (ISO) » Sat May 24, 2008 6:01 am

Post by Shanba »

Vote Count:

3: Zu_Faul
(Battle Mage, Vollkan, elvis_knits)
1: Erg0
(Flameaxe)
1: elvis_knits
(Zu_Faul)

Not Voting:
DizzyIzzy, DarlaBlueEyes, Xylthixlm, IH, hasdgfas, Erg0, Panzerjager
(10:50:24 PM) xcaykex: GODDAMNIT I DONT WANNA GET RID OF MY TENTACLE RAPE PORN

Ribbit.
User avatar
zu_Faul
zu_Faul
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
zu_Faul
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1615
Joined: March 10, 2005

Post Post #2451 (ISO) » Sat May 24, 2008 6:27 am

Post by zu_Faul »

Battle Mage wrote:
zu_Faul wrote:
elvis_knits wrote:So I looked at zu_faul's posts in isolation and I see a fair amount of fighting/animosity between him and TS. Granted, some of it was like four months ago. But he does call her a retard several times. Yet he didn't want to lynch her yesterday.

That is not logical. Unless he's scum and found TS useful because she was helping get so many townies lynched.

vote zu_faul
Nice OMGUS. And I never palyed with TS before. I had to get used to her style. BTW you are still scum.
Vote: elvis_knits
You've never played with DGB??
No.
Zu Faul wrote:
DarlaBlueEyes wrote:this is muy muy interesante , I MA leaning towards a Zu lynch as well, Im inclined to believe hasdhdgasadcow.
Yeah, let's not do some work and just jump on the forming bandwagon, yeah. **** you.
You make it sound like it's personal... 0.o

Tell me, do you have any suspicions that aren't doused in OMGUS?

BM[/quote]

It's not OMGUS what I did. I voted e_k for the reasons I stated yesterday. Like you did with me. Only the I had reason yesterday and you only a vague feeling.
User avatar
Battle Mage
Battle Mage
Jester
User avatar
User avatar
Battle Mage
Jester
Jester
Posts: 22231
Joined: January 10, 2007

Post Post #2452 (ISO) » Sat May 24, 2008 6:46 am

Post by Battle Mage »

Oh, you can bet your life i have reason :D
Show
2020 Stats - 31 completed games:

Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4

winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%
User avatar
Battle Mage
Battle Mage
Jester
User avatar
User avatar
Battle Mage
Jester
Jester
Posts: 22231
Joined: January 10, 2007

Post Post #2453 (ISO) » Sat May 24, 2008 6:47 am

Post by Battle Mage »

Battle Mage wrote:
Xylthixlm wrote:vollkan and elvis_knits, answer my post 2431.
why not me?

Actually, i dont really understand the CPR Doc mechanic. So if someone can please explain that, it might help... lol

BM
an answer would be awesome, so i can make some sense of the current discussion.... :(

BM
Show
2020 Stats - 31 completed games:

Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4

winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%
User avatar
zu_Faul
zu_Faul
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
zu_Faul
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1615
Joined: March 10, 2005

Post Post #2454 (ISO) » Sat May 24, 2008 7:05 am

Post by zu_Faul »

CPR doc kills his target, unless the target was also target of another kill, in which case all kills are prevented. Don't know what happens if there are two kills + cpr on one target.
User avatar
Xylthixlm
Xylthixlm
!xmafia win
User avatar
User avatar
Xylthixlm
!xmafia win
!xmafia win
Posts: 5414
Joined: July 12, 2006

Post Post #2455 (ISO) » Sat May 24, 2008 7:09 am

Post by Xylthixlm »

elvis_knits wrote:
Xylthixlm wrote:Which of these scenarios is most likely for Night 2?
(a) hasdgfas is lying about targeting Zu_Faul
(b) Zu_Faul is a godfather, the wolf kill was stopped by a doc
(c) Zu_Faul is a godfather, the wolves didn't kill
(d) Zu_Faul was targeted by a vig, the wolf kill was stopped by a doc
(e) Zu_Faul was targeted by a vig, the wolves didn't kill
(f) the wolves tried to kill Zu_Faul

I'm leaning to (f) but I'm curious what other people think. Especially the people voting Zu_Faul.
N2? We had a kill that night, right, but only one. And we know that we had a SK active in addition to the wolves.

Either TS tried to kill zu and was stopped by hascow, or TS tried to kill zu but was stopped by him being GF, or TS tried to kill someone else which didn't work for some reason -- and hascow targetted zu but didn't kill him because zu is GF or was targetted by a vig.
TS tried to kill zu and was stopped by hascow: The kill that night was not wolf-flavored, so this only works if there is also a vig and the wolves failed/nokilled.
TS tried to kill zu but was stopped by him being GF: exactly the same as the previous one.
TS tried to kill someone else but didn't work for some reason: why would you assume that it didn't work, since the one kill that night is not wolf-flavored? Unless you have a reason to believe that I'm wrong and that kill
was
done by the wolves...
#mafia@irc.globalgamers.net

"Xyl was completely berserk" -dramonic
"Xyl's ruthless policy lynching won the game." -Vi
User avatar
hasdgfas
hasdgfas
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
hasdgfas
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5628
Joined: October 2, 2007
Location: Madison, WI

Post Post #2456 (ISO) » Sat May 24, 2008 7:21 am

Post by hasdgfas »

zu_Faul wrote:CPR doc kills his target, unless the target was also target of another kill, in which case all kills are prevented. Don't know what happens if there are two kills + cpr on one target.
Here's the way I understand it:

CPR Doc (me) is processed after all other actions on the person I target.
If they are alive when my action is processed, I kill them.
If they are dead when my action is processed, I revive them.
jdodge1019: hasjghsalghsakljghs is from vermont
jdodge1019: vermont is made of liberal freaks and cows
jdodge1019: he's not a liberal
jdodge1019: thus he is a cow
User avatar
hasdgfas
hasdgfas
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
hasdgfas
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5628
Joined: October 2, 2007
Location: Madison, WI

Post Post #2457 (ISO) » Sat May 24, 2008 7:37 am

Post by hasdgfas »

Hi.
zu_Faul wrote: In other news I believe cow's claim. Makes sense.
zu_Faul wrote: Not that I find hasdafgas' claim too believable with a Doc and a Jailkeeper down.
I'd like an explanation for why you switched your thoughts about me after I claimed to have targeted you, and was slightly suspicious of you.
jdodge1019: hasjghsalghsakljghs is from vermont
jdodge1019: vermont is made of liberal freaks and cows
jdodge1019: he's not a liberal
jdodge1019: thus he is a cow
User avatar
zu_Faul
zu_Faul
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
zu_Faul
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1615
Joined: March 10, 2005

Post Post #2458 (ISO) » Sat May 24, 2008 8:05 am

Post by zu_Faul »

hasdgfas wrote:Hi.
zu_Faul wrote: In other news I believe cow's claim. Makes sense.
zu_Faul wrote: Not that I find hasdafgas' claim too believable with a Doc and a Jailkeeper down.
I'd like an explanation for why you switched your thoughts about me after I claimed to have targeted you, and was slightly suspicious of you.
The first one was Day 1, when there were no night actions to be concerned of, right?
Doc and Jailkeeper went down afterwards.
User avatar
hasdgfas
hasdgfas
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
hasdgfas
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5628
Joined: October 2, 2007
Location: Madison, WI

Post Post #2459 (ISO) » Sat May 24, 2008 8:30 am

Post by hasdgfas »

zu_Faul wrote:
hasdgfas wrote:Hi.
zu_Faul wrote: In other news I believe cow's claim. Makes sense.
zu_Faul wrote: Not that I find hasdafgas' claim too believable with a Doc and a Jailkeeper down.
I'd like an explanation for why you switched your thoughts about me after I claimed to have targeted you, and was slightly suspicious of you.
The first one was Day 1, when there were no night actions to be concerned of, right?
Doc and Jailkeeper went down afterwards.
The first one was day 2, after we lynched the jailkeeper and I accidentally killed the doc.
jdodge1019: hasjghsalghsakljghs is from vermont
jdodge1019: vermont is made of liberal freaks and cows
jdodge1019: he's not a liberal
jdodge1019: thus he is a cow
User avatar
zu_Faul
zu_Faul
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
zu_Faul
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1615
Joined: March 10, 2005

Post Post #2460 (ISO) » Sat May 24, 2008 8:40 am

Post by zu_Faul »

Ah, OK.

Maybe I didn't really think it through at that time, and I saw you as a Vig. Heck, it has been months since the first post.

I don't really get why you would want to more or less randomly target someone at night. It's very possible that you are Mafia and are just afraid of a Watcher/Tracker.

Is there any reason hasdgfas shouldn't tell us last night's target?
User avatar
hasdgfas
hasdgfas
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
hasdgfas
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5628
Joined: October 2, 2007
Location: Madison, WI

Post Post #2461 (ISO) » Sun May 25, 2008 4:33 am

Post by hasdgfas »

zu_Faul wrote: I don't really get why you would want to more or less randomly target someone at night.
Is there any reason hasdgfas shouldn't tell us last night's target?
Randomly target someone? Where did I say or imply that?

I'm also fine telling my target if the town wants me to.
jdodge1019: hasjghsalghsakljghs is from vermont
jdodge1019: vermont is made of liberal freaks and cows
jdodge1019: he's not a liberal
jdodge1019: thus he is a cow
User avatar
Erg0
Erg0
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Erg0
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4157
Joined: February 25, 2007
Location: Secret Aussie.

Post Post #2462 (ISO) » Sun May 25, 2008 10:42 am

Post by Erg0 »

I have some catching up to do.
"You were doing well until everyone died."
V/LA most weekends.
User avatar
Xylthixlm
Xylthixlm
!xmafia win
User avatar
User avatar
Xylthixlm
!xmafia win
!xmafia win
Posts: 5414
Joined: July 12, 2006

Post Post #2463 (ISO) » Sun May 25, 2008 11:19 am

Post by Xylthixlm »

hasdgfas, I would like to know your target sometime today.
#mafia@irc.globalgamers.net

"Xyl was completely berserk" -dramonic
"Xyl's ruthless policy lynching won the game." -Vi
User avatar
DarlaBlueEyes
DarlaBlueEyes
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
DarlaBlueEyes
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1615
Joined: April 13, 2008
Location: Texas

Post Post #2464 (ISO) » Sun May 25, 2008 12:29 pm

Post by DarlaBlueEyes »

I think it would be helpful to know your target as well
Show
you done goofed.


Il Sarcastro (3:40:26 AM): Hitler doesn't like the Beatles
Il Sarcastro (3:40:30 AM): And that's what makes him Hitler
User avatar
DizzyIzzyB13
DizzyIzzyB13
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
DizzyIzzyB13
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1809
Joined: March 17, 2008
Location: Underneath the Sky

Post Post #2465 (ISO) » Mon May 26, 2008 1:19 am

Post by DizzyIzzyB13 »

While I'm not entirely convinced of the merit of the zu_faul wagon, I do note that he's been very prickly and prone to using some rather unsporting language. He does jump around with his vote, and seems prone to interpreting every comment as being scummy to a degree. He could be scum. Certainly, he's the closest thing I have to a scum read on someone at the moment.
Show
DizzyIzzyB13: For the record, I /ghooked Cogitate :p
ChannelDelibird: Well, for the record, FUCK YOU
ChannelDelibird: ;_;
DizzyIzzyB13: Cogitate is shorter. :(
DizzyIzzyB13: Sorry, CD
ChannelDelibird: Well, at least that's the first time a girl has told me "it's not short enough"
User avatar
Battle Mage
Battle Mage
Jester
User avatar
User avatar
Battle Mage
Jester
Jester
Posts: 22231
Joined: January 10, 2007

Post Post #2466 (ISO) » Mon May 26, 2008 1:42 am

Post by Battle Mage »

hasdgfas wrote:
zu_Faul wrote:CPR doc kills his target, unless the target was also target of another kill, in which case all kills are prevented. Don't know what happens if there are two kills + cpr on one target.
Here's the way I understand it:

CPR Doc (me) is processed after all other actions on the person I target.
If they are alive when my action is processed, I kill them.
If they are dead when my action is processed, I revive them.
ok that makes sense. thanks.

What did you claim as your previous night targets again?

BM
Show
2020 Stats - 31 completed games:

Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4

winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%
User avatar
hasdgfas
hasdgfas
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
hasdgfas
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5628
Joined: October 2, 2007
Location: Madison, WI

Post Post #2467 (ISO) » Mon May 26, 2008 3:48 am

Post by hasdgfas »

Night 1 I targeted Peers, being almost certain they'd kill the claimed doc.
Night 2 I targeted zu.
jdodge1019: hasjghsalghsakljghs is from vermont
jdodge1019: vermont is made of liberal freaks and cows
jdodge1019: he's not a liberal
jdodge1019: thus he is a cow
User avatar
Battle Mage
Battle Mage
Jester
User avatar
User avatar
Battle Mage
Jester
Jester
Posts: 22231
Joined: January 10, 2007

Post Post #2468 (ISO) » Mon May 26, 2008 5:16 am

Post by Battle Mage »

Hmm the Peers choice makes sense. But why would Zu Faul be targetted on Night 2?

BM
Show
2020 Stats - 31 completed games:

Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4

winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%
User avatar
Xylthixlm
Xylthixlm
!xmafia win
User avatar
User avatar
Xylthixlm
!xmafia win
!xmafia win
Posts: 5414
Joined: July 12, 2006

Post Post #2469 (ISO) » Mon May 26, 2008 6:14 am

Post by Xylthixlm »

Battle Mage wrote:Hmm the Peers choice makes sense. But why would Zu Faul be targetted on Night 2?

BM
Because hasdgfas thought Zu_Faul was scum, and was trying to kill him. It seems like hasdgfas might have saved him instead, since he didn't die and the werewolf kill is apparently missing that night. I have no idea why the werewolves would try to kill Zu_Faul, but if they did, he obviously isn't one of them...
#mafia@irc.globalgamers.net

"Xyl was completely berserk" -dramonic
"Xyl's ruthless policy lynching won the game." -Vi
User avatar
vollkan
vollkan
The Interrogator
User avatar
User avatar
vollkan
The Interrogator
The Interrogator
Posts: 5373
Joined: March 29, 2007
Location: Australia

Post Post #2470 (ISO) » Mon May 26, 2008 11:09 am

Post by vollkan »

Xylthixlm wrote:
elvis_knits wrote:
Xylthixlm wrote:Which of these scenarios is most likely for Night 2?
(a) hasdgfas is lying about targeting Zu_Faul
(b) Zu_Faul is a godfather, the wolf kill was stopped by a doc
(c) Zu_Faul is a godfather, the wolves didn't kill
(d) Zu_Faul was targeted by a vig, the wolf kill was stopped by a doc
(e) Zu_Faul was targeted by a vig, the wolves didn't kill
(f) the wolves tried to kill Zu_Faul

I'm leaning to (f) but I'm curious what other people think. Especially the people voting Zu_Faul.
N2? We had a kill that night, right, but only one. And we know that we had a SK active in addition to the wolves.

Either TS tried to kill zu and was stopped by hascow, or TS tried to kill zu but was stopped by him being GF, or TS tried to kill someone else which didn't work for some reason -- and hascow targetted zu but didn't kill him because zu is GF or was targetted by a vig.
TS tried to kill zu and was stopped by hascow: The kill that night was not wolf-flavored, so this only works if there is also a vig and the wolves failed/nokilled.
TS tried to kill zu but was stopped by him being GF: exactly the same as the previous one.
TS tried to kill someone else but didn't work for some reason: why would you assume that it didn't work, since the one kill that night is not wolf-flavored? Unless you have a reason to believe that I'm wrong and that kill
was
done by the wolves...
Hmm. I am curious - what do you think the implications of the targeting/kill combinations is?
hasd wrote: I'm also fine telling my target if the town wants me to.
If doing so won't have any negative effects (including loss of opportunity) than you might as well do so as early as possible,
User avatar
Xylthixlm
Xylthixlm
!xmafia win
User avatar
User avatar
Xylthixlm
!xmafia win
!xmafia win
Posts: 5414
Joined: July 12, 2006

Post Post #2471 (ISO) » Mon May 26, 2008 11:25 am

Post by Xylthixlm »

vollkan wrote:Hmm. I am curious - what do you think the implications of the targeting/kill combinations is?
The simplest explanation for the lack of hasdgfas + wolf kills N2 is that they both targeted Zu_Faul. Ergo, it is very likely Zu_Faul is not a wolf.

The simplest explanation for the lack of hasdgfas + wolf kills last night is that both targeted the same person. Ergo, it is very likely that person is not a wolf.
#mafia@irc.globalgamers.net

"Xyl was completely berserk" -dramonic
"Xyl's ruthless policy lynching won the game." -Vi
User avatar
vollkan
vollkan
The Interrogator
User avatar
User avatar
vollkan
The Interrogator
The Interrogator
Posts: 5373
Joined: March 29, 2007
Location: Australia

Post Post #2472 (ISO) » Mon May 26, 2008 7:23 pm

Post by vollkan »

Xylthixlm wrote:
vollkan wrote:Hmm. I am curious - what do you think the implications of the targeting/kill combinations is?
The simplest explanation for the lack of hasdgfas + wolf kills N2 is that they both targeted Zu_Faul. Ergo, it is very likely Zu_Faul is not a wolf.

The simplest explanation for the lack of hasdgfas + wolf kills last night is that both targeted the same person. Ergo, it is very likely that person is not a wolf.
Well met.
Unvote
. I think that you make an excellent point, and I can't justify voting Zu, much as I find his play scummy, unless something makes the scenario you posit less likely, and I cannot think of anything off the top of my head.

The obvious thing to do right now is for hasd to reveal, provided he doesn't think there is an overwhelming potential opportunity cost.
User avatar
Battle Mage
Battle Mage
Jester
User avatar
User avatar
Battle Mage
Jester
Jester
Posts: 22231
Joined: January 10, 2007

Post Post #2473 (ISO) » Mon May 26, 2008 11:37 pm

Post by Battle Mage »

Xylthixlm wrote:
Battle Mage wrote:Hmm the Peers choice makes sense. But why would Zu Faul be targetted on Night 2?

BM
Because hasdgfas thought Zu_Faul was scum, and was trying to kill him. It seems like hasdgfas might have saved him instead, since he didn't die and the werewolf kill is apparently missing that night. I have no idea why the werewolves would try to kill Zu_Faul, but if they did, he obviously isn't one of them...
Thats what i'm saying. Why would the werewolves want to kill Z_F who hasnt claimed, and would be a good mislynch. Unless of course they thought Z_F was onto them.

BM
Show
2020 Stats - 31 completed games:

Survived to the end and won - 11
Nightkilled - 10
Survived to the end and lost - 6
Day-elimmed by majority - 4

winrate as scum: 78%
winrate as town: 55%
User avatar
Xylthixlm
Xylthixlm
!xmafia win
User avatar
User avatar
Xylthixlm
!xmafia win
!xmafia win
Posts: 5414
Joined: July 12, 2006

Post Post #2474 (ISO) » Tue May 27, 2008 4:02 am

Post by Xylthixlm »

Battle Mage wrote:
Xylthixlm wrote:
Battle Mage wrote:Hmm the Peers choice makes sense. But why would Zu Faul be targetted on Night 2?

BM
Because hasdgfas thought Zu_Faul was scum, and was trying to kill him. It seems like hasdgfas might have saved him instead, since he didn't die and the werewolf kill is apparently missing that night. I have no idea why the werewolves would try to kill Zu_Faul, but if they did, he obviously isn't one of them...
Thats what i'm saying. Why would the werewolves want to kill Z_F who hasnt claimed, and would be a good mislynch. Unless of course they thought Z_F was onto them.

BM
Read what I wrote again. I'm saying Zu_Faul is
not
a werewolf.
#mafia@irc.globalgamers.net

"Xyl was completely berserk" -dramonic
"Xyl's ruthless policy lynching won the game." -Vi

Return to “Completed Large Normal Games”