He was one of top reads Day 1 and 2. I liked a couple of his posts (I'lll go fishing if you want to know which ones) and I dind't have a bad feeling about him. A good feeling I must say, but for what it's worth...
I can ISO him after I'm back from that errand my wife is nagging me about...
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 348, Sashaddin wrote:I'm still trying to know how many scums are in this duet to try to vote smartly.
Scum him would already know his team size.
this looks like a legit town slip to me.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Lycan's vote is especially the kind of go with the flow vote I associate with scum.
IF this wagon goes through and it flips town lynch all 3 of these slots. Or we could just do Lycan or RCE.
or you know, you guys can lynch Proffi or help him bus Enigma.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Though I suppose that if he does flip town said scum team will be pushing a "Nero is scum that knew Sasha was town" narrative.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
I can get Enigma's vote, he was suspicious of me earlier. But I thought both RCS and Lycan were townreading me, and with the weird reason/no reason combo....
I'd lynch RCE before Enigma before Lycan, but I'll follow you for a while.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Yes
I wanted to initially, but something made me back up. I don't remember what exactly... I'll check my iso. This sound scummy af, but I'm high af as well.
I mean, I'd be relatively ok with just lynching in RCE/Enigma/lycan if the WIFOM of RCE voting profii is too much.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
I just checked out Profii, his last minute vote on Enigma is curious. Distancing a scum or trying to pull a townie?
I'd be fine with either of the others at this moment as well.
not voting (7): BuJaber, Eyes without a face, 0verki11
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
you just continue to be the most pro-town thing I've ever seen
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 348, Sashaddin wrote:I'm still trying to know how many scums are in this duet to try to vote smartly.
Scum him would already know his team size.
this looks like a legit town slip to me.
Still don't know why Sash jumped on me saying there are four scum when the game size clearly pointed to four scum and no one treats it as a potential slip anyway.
In post 1793, Creature wrote:Still don't know why Sash jumped on me saying there are four scum when the game size clearly pointed to four scum and no one treats it as a potential slip anyway.
I told you, I didn't remember this Mod, Schadd, was giving that info openly. I thought it was 4 to but I was just unsure, I saw a game that had a serial killer not too long ago, making it 1-3-13 or something. Sorry for that.