but I want to solve this game nowIn post 148, northsidegal wrote:although i'd wait and see a bit more to if anything changes.
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
but I want to solve this game nowIn post 148, northsidegal wrote:although i'd wait and see a bit more to if anything changes.
does it really make a difference?In post 150, RadiantCowbells wrote:but I want to solve this game nowIn post 148, northsidegal wrote:although i'd wait and see a bit more to if anything changes.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
meh on roster. probably on drvr.In post 151, RadiantCowbells wrote:rosterfoster and drvr >rand scum
without hypothetically commenting on my read one way or another on DDL at this time
If this continues you know it probably means neither of you are sent to the mission today.In post 138, RadiantCowbells wrote:(if it's not already clear I'm townreading your opener)
I'm not. I also believe that it's correct to send you to access point over me given that if scum enters I'm more likely to get mislynched than you are.i certainly have no desire to play against you as scum, but i haven't really read much of this game beyond the intro posts about the vig claims and such
i'm curious how you could possibly think that this is the correct way to deal with this situation.In post 153, RCEnigma wrote:If this continues you know it probably means neither of you are sent to the mission today.
if what continues?In post 153, RCEnigma wrote:If this continues you know it probably means neither of you are sent to the mission today.
The two of you townreading each other. I'm aware it's only been expressed one way but still.In post 155, northsidegal wrote:if what continues?In post 153, RCEnigma wrote:If this continues you know it probably means neither of you are sent to the mission today.
did i indicate somewhere that i townread RC?In post 156, RCEnigma wrote:The two of you townreading each other. I'm aware it's only been expressed one way but still.In post 155, northsidegal wrote:if what continues?In post 153, RCEnigma wrote:If this continues you know it probably means neither of you are sent to the mission today.
do you not?In post 159, northsidegal wrote:did i indicate somewhere that i townread RC?In post 156, RCEnigma wrote:The two of you townreading each other. I'm aware it's only been expressed one way but still.In post 155, northsidegal wrote:if what continues?In post 153, RCEnigma wrote:If this continues you know it probably means neither of you are sent to the mission today.
In post 165, RCEnigma wrote:That's why I said it was one way at this point.
if it's "one-way", as you say, i don't think your logic still holds up. go through it again for me?In post 167, RCEnigma wrote:Not sure I trust nsg's read on you as much as I trust your read on nsg but forcing scum to flip one of you removes the doubt there.
so you're concerned that we're both scum? why are we more likely to be both scum than any other arbitrary pairing of 2 people in the playerlistIn post 167, RCEnigma wrote:Not sure I trust nsg's read on you as much as I trust your read on nsg but forcing scum to flip one of you removes the doubt there.
Man up and read you I guess.In post 171, RadiantCowbells wrote:hypothetically if neither of us died N1, what would you do on D2?
I wasn't pairing you as scum.In post 170, RadiantCowbells wrote:so you're concerned that we're both scum? why are we more likely to be both scum than any other arbitrary pairing of 2 people in the playerlistIn post 167, RCEnigma wrote:Not sure I trust nsg's read on you as much as I trust your read on nsg but forcing scum to flip one of you removes the doubt there.