I'm quite impressed that with your one game of experience with me you've managed to perfectly determine what is and isn't normal play for me, while simultaneously attributing to me a line of play that indicates I would be concerned about shitposting, and try to break up said shitposting through means that are *outside* of my normal play.In post 338, RCEnigma wrote:Ehh don't feel as strongly about it with the way that FL framed it. So I understand Cerb as a mechanical player and this would only be my second game with him but here it seems like it was just a weak attempt to break up the social play and have those slots change tempo.In post 336, Powerpuff Girls wrote:Why?In post 160, RCEnigma wrote:I solve through shitposting. Cerb scum btw.
Liking RCE and Alchemist.
~BC
Compared to his RR early game in OK2 where he actually used RVS to analyze and force the game to his strengths. He isn't bringing the game to him in the same way.
It was so weak that it makes me think traitor with 1 scum in the block that was forming or scum with a partner in the block that was forming.
....
/s, if necessary.
Generally speaking, I find FL's vote swap extremely suspect. A VC shows up, with two people at 3/3, and the momentum HUGELY shifts within like 6 posts to being 5:2? That...that's the sort of thing I deliberately set up by making vote counts tied, just to see who blinks and tries to push momentum somewhere.
@Liger: In that last game A50 was slotted as town by me, at least, because of his D1 play, and because the role felt....a bit unwieldy for scum to have to deal with in that game. His blowup actually felt super out of character to me.
@Shadowless: How could you possibly think that days were only three "RL" days long here? :-/ And if you did think that, and thus thought that things were that fast paced, why would a claim at l-4 be reasonable when in a game as fast paced as that, momentum could easily move elsewhere?
-Cerb
to pay respects.
