BooneyToonz X: Boonin’ It In The Slums [TOWN WIN]

Xtoxm · Post Post #1250 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2019 8:42 pm

can we get some more votes on ras

ceejayvinoya · Post Post #1251 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2019 8:43 pm

VOTE: xtoxm

Here you go

UnaBombaH · Post Post #1252 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2019 8:45 pm

In post 1243, RAS wrote:You did play wonky, and yes we've multiple "actually" scummy slots in the game, but you're one of them.

I can accept this part, but I can't take any "hard guilties" you will eventually claim to have very seriously either.

RAS · Post Post #1253 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2019 8:45 pm

In post 1252, UnaBombaH wrote:
In post 1243, RAS wrote:You did play wonky, and yes we've multiple "actually" scummy slots in the game, but you're one of them.
I can accept this part, but I can't take any "hard guilties" you will eventually claim to have very seriously either.

That's fine. I'm not asking for anyone to take it seriously.

ceejayvinoya · Post Post #1254 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2019 8:46 pm

Uh what

ceejayvinoya · Post Post #1255 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2019 8:47 pm

Someone parse the above statement for me because it looks like ras is saying not to take his hard guilty srsly

RAS · Post Post #1256 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2019 8:48 pm

Nah. I'm just not going to force anyone to believe me, but the reason I'm waiting to out it is that I want to see more interactions between players.

If you take it seriously, cool. If you don't, that's fine, I'm not going to go out of my way to convince you.

ceejayvinoya · Post Post #1257 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2019 8:49 pm

Ah I see

Nero Cain · Post Post #1258 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2019 9:39 pm

In post 1250, Xtoxm wrote:can we get some more votes on ras

you aren't even caught up yet?

Xtoxm · Post Post #1259 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2019 9:44 pm

Sheldon Cooper PhD · Post Post #1260 (ISO) » Fri Apr 19, 2019 10:34 pm

We have someone claiming a hard guilty

Today is a 1v1 between the claimaint vs the accused

We don’t even consider a mass claim until tomorrow - otherwise we will just end up outing a protective etc

Whoever said the cycle of L-1, claim, oh god no, repeat is right - the site meta has appeared to moved into a phase of forgetting to evaluate claims which is stupid, or perhaps caught scums getting good at making obscure claims that aren’t directly counter claimable

So my proposal is we look into the hard guilty and if we really can’t decide we asses the person who wanted to ignore the guilty for a mass claim

I’ve not even looked back at why scum made that kill yet - golly gosh this will be fun

ceejayvinoya · Post Post #1261 (ISO) » Sat Apr 20, 2019 12:18 am

Sheldon here making his first good post

Tho it's more of an okayish one than a good one.

@Sheldon are you in favor of a massclaim? Assuming there are no more hard guilties stuff?

Vorkuta · Post Post #1262 (ISO) » Sat Apr 20, 2019 12:28 am

Ayt so I have a few more takers for "massclaim is dumb vork", and not too many for "hey the mass claim might not be too bad".

I'll wait for the others to check in, but I'm getting the feeling that... no.
I'll be really mad and rub it in people's faces if we lose 2 PR's before then so I hope my personal appeal could slightly help tip the scales in my favor.

RCEnigma · Post Post #1263 (ISO) » Sat Apr 20, 2019 12:29 am

In post 1260, Sheldon Cooper PhD wrote:We don’t even consider a mass claim until tomorrow - otherwise we will just end up outing a protective etc

Idk if that answers your question or not.

RCEnigma · Post Post #1264 (ISO) » Sat Apr 20, 2019 12:30 am

Lose 2 PRS as in a mislynch and nk or??

Vorkuta · Post Post #1265 (ISO) » Sat Apr 20, 2019 12:33 am

Yeah- worst case scenario.

Vorkuta · Post Post #1266 (ISO) » Sat Apr 20, 2019 12:33 am

WTF else did you think I was saying/implying with that?

RCEnigma · Post Post #1267 (ISO) » Sat Apr 20, 2019 1:52 am

I just don't see what that has to do with massclaim. That's always worst case scenario, every day played.

Tchill13 · Post Post #1268 (ISO) » Sat Apr 20, 2019 2:57 am

Pretty sure Dave is town. Nobody wanted to vote the guy last day phase when we had the option of voting Dave or AN and I kinda feel like if scum knows he's town that's someone you can lynch later in the game.

I really appreciate the ascetic fake claim though... That's makes sooo much sense lol.

Also I have to catch up. I just seen some votes on Dave and I just disagree lynching there this day phase.

Tchill13 · Post Post #1269 (ISO) » Sat Apr 20, 2019 2:58 am

In post 1267, RCEnigma wrote:I just don't see what that has to do with massclaim. That's always worst case scenario, every day played.

Yeah only mass claim the day before potential lylo. Don't give scum more information... Sheesh.

Nero Cain · Post Post #1270 (ISO) » Sat Apr 20, 2019 3:00 am

that doesn't make Dave town lol

Tchill13 · Post Post #1271 (ISO) » Sat Apr 20, 2019 3:06 am

Why is una pushing RAS at all for even something "scummy"? Because RAS is a Mason lol...

davesaz · Post Post #1272 (ISO) » Sat Apr 20, 2019 3:23 am

I'm volunteering today, gone most/all of the morning. @bottom of 49

Tchill13 · Post Post #1273 (ISO) » Sat Apr 20, 2019 3:49 am

It's literally just for voting him??? No other reason huh?

Sheldon Cooper PhD · Post Post #1274 (ISO) » Sat Apr 20, 2019 3:53 am

In post 1263, RCEnigma wrote:
In post 1260, Sheldon Cooper PhD wrote:We don’t even consider a mass claim until tomorrow - otherwise we will just end up outing a protective etc
Idk if that answers your question or not.

Indeed - might as well ‘follow the guilty’ for 1, or worst case 2 days