It's probably weak, but I don't really care. Eyes' case on Saudade was shit because it wasn't even a read on Saudade himself, but more so all gimmick alts. I was okay with lynching both TL and Eyes, but that post is what made me switch.In post 720, ofrhz wrote:I feel like this is a weak reason to townread Saudade.
Especially considering that Saudade was against the TL lynch that you were voting for
Could you quote these responses that you've liked? A big problem I've with eyes is that he's being reactive as opposed to proactive.In post 729, rosterfoster wrote:I’ve been liking how Eyes’ has been responding lately. It all feels very honest.
In post 707, Eyes without a face wrote:In fact, this is the only read that looks authentic on TL's readlist, yet TL has him 2 notches higher than bottom in BOTH his posted readlists which I also find intriguing. Like, why does TL post read lists when he's not voting his top SR anyway? I was his Top SR and he didn't vote me until he moved me up 4 notches. WHY?
In post 706, Eyes without a face wrote:Saudi Arabia is one of those people I'd auto-SR like Dr Worm and such players. I don't think it funny to do gimmicks and talk nonsense all the time. Sometimes they provide random reads but nothing to discuss. When they do engage they are asking others such silly questions (like "what does this mean?" & "why do you think that?") which makes them appear like they're asking questions when they really aren't.In post 700, ofrhz wrote:
What are your reads eyes?
Im curious about your read on saudade in particular
In short, I have no qualms voting S.A. (whom I am intentionally misspelling as Saudi Arabia in revenge for his treatment to my name) but I can't say I gave a read on him one way or another with confidence.
Do you agree with this?In post 740, awestfie wrote:he's being reactive as opposed to proactive
From my experience, proactive players are more likely to be town. However, I guess it's different for everyone.In post 744, rosterfoster wrote:I do agree. I’m not sure that’s necessarily scummy though, like it happens all the time that town are a bit disengaged?
He wasn't, but that's the problem with the majority of his posts. He doesn't say much of anything and instead just sits on the fence a lot. This is exactly why I feel like he's being reactive.In post 744, rosterfoster wrote:He wasn’t really scumreading from that post though? It was more like ‘I think this person is useless so I not mind voting them’
There are. I think TL/Eyes are really close for me in terms of who I'd lynch.In post 745, rosterfoster wrote:There are worse lynches than eyes for sure, but I just don’t see that he’s been as actively scummy as TL for instance.
Of course. But most players are town so a reactive player is probably town too. Trick to mafia is figuring out which is whichIn post 746, awestfie wrote:From my experience, proactive players are more likely to be town. However, I guess it's different for everyone.
. I dont think I’ve got that down yet tbh, but I almost feel that Eyes is playing without an agenda, while a reactive scum player would have one. I think he is playing with an agenda, but it's just the wrong one. He's trying to play to survive as opposed to playing to find scum.In post 747, rosterfoster wrote:I almost feel that Eyes is playing without an agenda, while a reactive scum player would have one.
This I can agree with. A big part of my read on TL is the fact that his reads seem very disconnected. He seems to be taking things way more serious than they really are and that's usually something that gives me scum vibes.In post 748, rosterfoster wrote:Again TL is hard to sort for similar reasons, but I was seeing more of an agenda there. That@/ probably the best way to put how I feel about them.