Long ago experience. Unless you have an alt I don't know about. But it was one of my best games.
Clemency only said Howdy.
VOTE: Clemency
Off to work now. Much work.
Long ago experience. Unless you have an alt I don't know about. But it was one of my best games.
Thanks, but I actually don't get mislynched. (An alt was taken out by a vig, but that doesn't count)In post 36, mastina wrote:Town, but going to be mislynched before the end of the game.In post 17, TheBrie wrote:Long ago experience. Unless you have an alt I don't know about. But it was one of my best games.
Clemency only said Howdy.
VOTE: Clemency
Off to work now. Much work.
Why is it then? This vote came before Ausuka's question controversy, so it's not that.In post 49, NotMySpamAccount wrote:"early discussion" not really, there was only a handful of things to comment on last I checked, none of which were consequential enough to warrant attention. Also VOTE: Ausuka this is not RVS.In post 48, Buki wrote:It's not really no reason but yeah, kind of a slippery rope.
VOTE: NMSA
I think this is the true most scum equity slot right now, he came to the thread and even with all this early discussion he simply goes off to make a fluff post
So your vote on me was still RVS? Especially as you quickly abandoned it?
Ausuka does 'bad posting' though. There a bit of a mannerism thing in there, especially with the rest of the controversy. I think it's NAI. And not the worst of questions. Sometimes its not quite clear what a person actually means. I actually wouldn't mind an answer to it myself. i know what shading is, but I don't know what NMSA was actually trying to say about Ausuka.In post 55, Buki wrote:Ausuka recent posts could go either way for me
either try hard town or try hard scum
but...this is actually bad postingIn post 54, Ausuka wrote:what does "shading arguments" mean?
Was that meant to be sarcasm?In post 76, NotMySpamAccount wrote:Agree, I'd never put in the work to find evidence like that as scum.In post 62, RAS wrote:Buki's town.
Nah. I don't. It was a comment along the lines of "Hey, if I or anyone else were looking for more stupid reasons to vote Clemency, we could say he's defensive. Because he's actually responding as if I really cared whether he had a reason or not. And thus defending himself."In post 42, Ausuka wrote:I don't get what this means really. "could be construed" as being defensive? Do you believe it or not?In post 34, TheBrie wrote:Clemency could be construed as being defensive.
Also I get what Clemency is saying and I don't think his pov is scummy at all.
I'm not allowed to reply to comments in the discussion thread? Honestly I don't know how I've never been mislynched.In post 39, TemporalLich wrote: Asides from my answer to Buki's question being a point against TheBrie, the rest of her ISO is pretty much "I don't get mislynched"
I'm not sure if I like it either.In post 60, RAS wrote: I dislike Brie's defensive comment towards Clemency in Post 34. I don't feel like he was being defensive in any way and it's a bit far-fetched to call that defensive.
Agreed.In post 48, Korina wrote:???
This vote doesn't make sense to me. I could see it being RVS, but... even then... like... wtf?
Just the disparity of your reads. Not you as people.Korina wrote:What about us?In post 34, TheBrie wrote:It's funny to see the wildly different reads in the discussion thread. They're probably unbiased, but also not subject to in game pressure, so they don't have to temper anything or be serious.
Compare Mastina and Korina.
Might be a point.Korina wrote:Honestly agreeing on this.In post 48, Buki wrote:It's not really no reason but yeah, kind of a slippery rope.
VOTE: NMSA
I think this is the true most scum equity slot right now, he came to the thread and even with all this early discussion he simply goes off to make a fluff post
Does that mean something?In post 161, YyottaCat wrote:*But nobody came*
Oh, I'll say something anyway. Interesting line of thought.In post 99, podoboq wrote:Hmm, I hadn't disected why I was killed that hard. I assumed it was just because I had decent reads and scum didn't want me to participate, but that doesn't really make sense because they didn't stop me from doing that.
Best guess is actually that scumdidn'tthink I was a likely mislynch. I have a tendency to obvtown some of the time, and people who've played with me, like Fumuki, would know that, and have a reason to nightkill me.
Umlaut and TheBrie both saw me do that as scum. I don't think they've played with town!me before.
I'm reading it now. But work hasn't given me time to analyze anything. Haven't done much more than gut reading and I'm usually rubbish at that. Not trying niw as I should be sleeping.In post 107, podoboq wrote:OK, but really guys, I think Fumuki is scum, and I don't think the players are reading this thread anymore.
Can't you at least attempt to do something useful? Don't skate by on the fact that you're no one's major scum read.In post 228, Clemency wrote:big oof
Are you suggesting we lynch it first then? That's maybe less fair.In post 230, Ausuka wrote:i don't really think it's very fair for someone to have to replace into yyottaslot here
Do you want me to vote you? Please give thoughts about something.In post 231, Clemency wrote:but that's like my whole thingIn post 229, TheBrie wrote:Can't you at least attempt to do something useful? Don't skate by on the fact that you're no one's major scum read.In post 228, Clemency wrote:big oof
i meant the part where she said that if Yyotta was town, there would be less resistance, and that scum would have lynched it. But now considering that there's not been mush time and that scum can't lynch anyone without town help, it's at least as likely to have been held back by cautious townies.In post 239, TrainDriver wrote:Just in time to be included in this post.In post 238, TheBrie wrote:When exactly was I pushing a policy lynch? I'm not trying to push anything but people's involvement.
You think that Ausuka's case is "alright" when it is clearly a policy lynch.In post 224, TheBrie wrote:Ausuka's argument for why Yyotta is scum sounds alright. NMSA's vote comment could be what Moongrass thinks, or could come from town who by POE thinks it's unlikely both Ausuka and Yyotta are town, and that it's more likely Ausuka is scum constructing a fake argument than town who is wrong. But still think Yyotta is more likely scum.
I'll mostly likely vote Yyotta, but I need to run ISOs first, and I'm certainly not ready for the day to be over.
You mean the time when I was a serial killer?In post 252, Flavor Leaf wrote:226 looks super political to me, but maybe that’s just gut.
I feel I’ve gut read Brie as scum correctly before, though, but I don’t have a lot of familiarity with a decent amount of players here.