I'd say your wrong but I've been raised to not be a liar.In post 299, no lunch wrote:This hydra is an agent of chaos. No matter its alignment.
- Bambs.
I'd say your wrong but I've been raised to not be a liar.In post 299, no lunch wrote:This hydra is an agent of chaos. No matter its alignment.
In post 250, Skygazer wrote:fusc has high scum equity for only talking setup spec so far
like seriously, no reads there from him so far
In post 251, Fuscosco wrote:Thats a surprising shallow read coming from you. I had you figured for quiet, not shallow
after coalition, i sort of want to locktown you in spite of never seeing your scumgame.In post 241, no lunch wrote:After coalition, I am also certain I will be successful in determining your alignment.In post 239, Skygazer wrote:i think no lunch is town here because they're treating my slot and others similarly to how they did in coalition, pushing for real time interactions
If there is anything I should be looking for, alert me to it.
this is the second post from Fusco that feels too demonstrative. i could find the first one but... whatever.In post 290, Fuscosco wrote:Who would you like me to fork milk?
Fork primate and tenrose. Or fork me and I'll handle it like I handled low-energy Jeb!In post 277, themilkcartonkid wrote:So is everyone good with roster fusc?
hm... so it's skimming at meta, an activity tell in a game that just started (and that isn't correct with my meta to begin with).In post 310, Fuscosco wrote:your meta paints you as much more active, and a very cursory glance at your scumgame is closer to this than your townie game.
your reads are limited in scope here, and focused on who should die instead of live, and I don't like the general cofidence you seem to hold in your TRs
This is a very bad stance, but please keep going.In post 310, Fuscosco wrote:your meta paints you as much more active, and a very cursory glance at your scumgame is closer to this than your townie game.
your reads are limited in scope here, and focused on who should die instead of live, and I don't like the general cofidence you seem to hold in your TRs
I dont think youre good scum. I think people will write you off laterIn post 317, Chara wrote:i'm also sideeying that you think i'm good scum (i asked why you thought this, by the way, not why you scumread me) who would be hard to get later, but also that i'm obvious enough scum that you can look at my games for two seconds and make any sort of meta tell from them. :>
Lol What a complete lack of respect to suggest thisIn post 316, Chara wrote:looks hindsighty. did you really get that about me before i asked you this question, or after?