Goodbye other meIn post 1249, Exilon wrote:Im vla until Tuesday, sorry guys
I mostly just wanna chill this weekend but if anyone wants anything from me, ask away, I'll check back later.
Goodbye other meIn post 1249, Exilon wrote:Im vla until Tuesday, sorry guys
What I find interesting is the wagons are spread out which could mean a number of things. It's quite a contrast to yesterday where their was like 2-3 wagons where everyone was.In post 1251, tris wrote:
I think this gamestate is illustrative of two thingsIn post 1252, Garmr wrote:What I find interesting is the wagons are spread out which could mean a number of things. It's quite a contrast to yesterday where their was like 2-3 wagons where everyone was.
@urap like this is kinda what i was expecting him to say when i asked him why he unvoted me - this just isn't the sort of read reversal taht comes from scum ^^^In post 1231, High Risk Gamble wrote:Well I still a few marked up to read but you seem very one tracked minded and a lot more direct as scum. I'm sure the effort if pit in 100% but you come off as less caring to how the game state is as scum.
Here although I'm disagreeing with a lot of what your saying the posting style is very different and although I think the questions look/appear like they lack genuine attitude you're not just sitting on a read and trying to skim by.
I'm confident enough to not vote you for now.
Exilon I really like as town.
i didn't really agree with your analysis so much as saying that i don't know if it's wrong but i don't see any compelling reason why i should believe your pov more than my ownIn post 1234, Exilon wrote:a) #ISaidIFelt
What I meant is I feel you're dismissing the analysis in a way that comes across as a bit dishonest to me. At certain points you agree with the analysis I make but you still don't see the conclusions as more likely and while it's all a a bit ambiguous (in the sense is actions can be mostly seen from both perspectives it seems), your conclusion to the content is basically "well I can see town doing that, sooooooooooooo"
Which is basically the argument you bring up for me, "I can see myself making posts like that as scum, sooooooo", (which is already terrible enough on its own, re: projecting) and then you vote for me, and not him, so it all feels like unfairly biased for what is essentially you being arbitrary about it. If we're both nullreads to you, what is tilting you to be pushing me instead of him? Projection? Bias? What am I missing here?
tbh yes sometimesIn post 1234, Exilon wrote:His latest post confirms my interpretation and denies yours. Essentially, he was sheeping his top scumread. Town does this??
i mean it was always an emotion-argument, sometimes i just actually attach words to the emotions instead of just declaring things to be bad on gutIn post 1234, Exilon wrote:To reiterate, I post a summary + analysis;
You say it's information instead of analysis, which is a content-argument;
I apply that logic to show it's not, disproving your claim, which should force you to reconsider it instead of dismissing it;
You change into an emotion-argument to keep dismissing it.
My point here isn't what is or isn't, it's how you're doing it.
taht's what i thought but i wasn't sureIn post 1234, Exilon wrote:By supporting a scum agenda I mean his actions have been harmful to town.
yeah idk i'm thinkign this might be a thing tooIn post 1238, u r a person 2 wrote:ooooh it is ausuka scum, huh
VOTE: ausuka
I dunno how i missed the over-explaining
but this would also make a shit ton of sense for how I'm interpreting this gamestate rn
yeah this feels like we aren't anywhere close to getting a scum lynch todayIn post 1252, Garmr wrote:What I find interesting is the wagons are spread out which could mean a number of things. It's quite a contrast to yesterday where their was like 2-3 wagons where everyone was.
hello!
This is basically an ideal situation to come into as a replacement IC.In post 1259, Detective Pikachu wrote:I'm pretty sure scum is on the leading wagon. OR scum is on the other wagons. OR scum is not voting. Or scum isn't voting. Or there is no scum! Wait, no, that last one doesn't work at all
Anything interesting I should know? I somehow didn't even know I was IC before taking the slot lol
bobIn post 1267, Detective Pikachu wrote:This is true. I am hoping to be able to properly focus on the game on Monday, in the mean time I'm mostly hoping to see who people will suggest we lynch to someone with a completely fresh perspective that has not (and will not, until Monday) read the game
I find it a bit scummy that you described 948 as being stretchy and forced, rather than just calling it out as being a loaded question.In post 1271, Ausuka wrote:be more specific. what don't you like about it?
I felt his recent set of analysis felt like he was doing it for the sake of being seen as doing it rather than him actually trying to scum hunt.In post 1269, Detective Pikachu wrote:Why? Is bob your uncle?
In post 1273, u r a person 2 wrote:I felt his recent set of analysis felt like he was doing it for the sake of being seen as doing it rather than him actually trying to scum hunt.In post 1269, Detective Pikachu wrote:Why? Is bob your uncle?