In post 180, Clemency wrote:like, i'd be okay with a no lunch lynch if it was a day from deadline because i dont necessarily scumread anyone else right now
i feel like i just need to see more from other people to form reads
'I dont necessarily scumread anyone else right now' implies he's scumreading in no lunch, but is making zero effort in questioning, casing or anything else on the slot. Stays out of any fight or discussion. Probs scum, likely not the lyncher.
Rawr!
#stopmodabuse
#Town!Ico.never.does.that.
"paying to play mafia is like paying someone to punch you in the face" ~ Datisi
The entire exchange in 168-172 (ish) feels weird. Datisi eager and easy to switch votes on no lunch, and a few posts later unvotes after a brief exchange?
Datisi, what exactly did no lunch say to convince you?
Rawr!
#stopmodabuse
#Town!Ico.never.does.that.
"paying to play mafia is like paying someone to punch you in the face" ~ Datisi
In post 228, no lunch wrote:Datisi has been replaced, Iconeum. You may recall I asked her much the same question, and am therefore fairly disappointed.
Even better. Scum got caught and replaced out probably.
VOTE: Austerity
Rawr!
#stopmodabuse
#Town!Ico.never.does.that.
"paying to play mafia is like paying someone to punch you in the face" ~ Datisi
"NMSA called out all three of us as scum or null in his reads list. Good thing no one's actually reading that." -Enter
"NMSA was at least a pretty easy mislynch that I didn't have to get my hands dirty to attain" -RC
"NMSA called out all three of us as scum or null in his reads list. Good thing no one's actually reading that." -Enter
"NMSA was at least a pretty easy mislynch that I didn't have to get my hands dirty to attain" -RC
In post 230, Iconeum wrote:Even better. Scum got caught and replaced out probably.
Newbies get replaced for a lot of reasons. You're really going to go with "Datisi broke site rules by tactically replacing out" as the most likely one?
In post 236, NotMySpamAccount wrote:I'll repeat my question to Datisi, gun to head who is the lyncher and why?
Urap2. Their early posts read as trying to fit in but not really agenda driven, implying that they're just looking to survive until they get a chance to seriously push their target.
That said, the above is bullshit because the question is bullshit. It's highly unlikely that my reasoning there is valid.
Interestingly, I was originally going to give the snarky answer that you were the lyncher for asking such an inane question, but I think that question actually makes you significantly less likely to be the lyncher.
In post 231, Iconeum wrote:Ohhh please tell me what about Clemency posts has been genuine? You can just quote the posts or something, there aren't that many
Forgot this. 97 feels pretty natural and it's something people might think twice about saying as scum, and especially as lyncher.
164 - 175 - 180 progression does not feel agenda driven at all. Simultaneously being confused by the wagon and admitting it has merit is a great way to look incredibly wishy-washy as scum, and I'd expect scum to either defend it or support it-- but not take both sides like he did.
In post 236, NotMySpamAccount wrote:I'll repeat my question to Datisi, gun to head who is the lyncher and why?
Urap2. Their early posts read as trying to fit in but not really agenda driven, implying that they're just looking to survive until they get a chance to seriously push their target.
That said, the above is bullshit because
the question is bullshit
. It's highly unlikely that my reasoning there is valid.
Interestingly, I was originally going to give the snarky answer that you were the lyncher for asking such an inane question, but I think that question actually makes you significantly less likely to be the lyncher.
"NMSA called out all three of us as scum or null in his reads list. Good thing no one's actually reading that." -Enter
"NMSA was at least a pretty easy mislynch that I didn't have to get my hands dirty to attain" -RC
In post 214, Vex Vience wrote:it was a part of the original setup notes. elsa jay, (the creator), has already stated that the rolecards being worded poorly/lacking information is their fault
Confirmation from the setup creator doesn't really mean anything, we need confirmation from the mod.
@Jingle - is the lyncher's target a secret miller?
Rawr!
Show
