I have mixed feelings on Sky right now but I'm willing to consider her as scum. I noticed a lot of her posting was lacking content. Besides that nothing stuck out as particularly scummy. I did like her giving reads and stuff during the replacements and arguing which helped end the disruption but that could easily have been done by scum to get some easy brownie points.
In post 372, Weiss Schnee wrote:Why? If I'm not in the coalition then either town wins without me or I don't have to do anything until like day 3 since we lynch in the coalition first. If I do literally nothing and stay out of the coalition then I can just continue to cruise and then scumhunt if the game isn't won by you all carrying. There's really very little reason to present towniness unless I am really sure I have to be in the coalition to win, and right now I'm not sure of that because half the player list is being replaced.
*shrug*
This is the same person who's currently disagreeing with a coalition.
Town!Krazy would make an actual case and give reasons why I should sheep him, not jump on me and accuse me of “scumclaiming” for failing to fall into line, according to him. He wrongly thinks that I’m so terrified of being mislynched again, that I’ve apparently had a lobotomy or something.
In post 372, Weiss Schnee wrote:Why? If I'm not in the coalition then either town wins without me or I don't have to do anything until like day 3 since we lynch in the coalition first. If I do literally nothing and stay out of the coalition then I can just continue to cruise and then scumhunt if the game isn't won by you all carrying. There's really very little reason to present towniness unless I am really sure I have to be in the coalition to win, and right now I'm not sure of that because half the player list is being replaced.
*shrug*
This is the same person who's currently disagreeing with a coalition.
Town!Krazy would make an actual case and give reasons why I should sheep him, not jump on me and accuse me of “scumclaiming” for failing to fall into line, according to him. He wrongly thinks that I’m so terrified of being mislynched again, that I’ve apparently had a lobotomy or something.
I would ignore Krazy's post if I were you; his thoughts are very disconnected and I don't think he believes half of the stuff he's saying. Regardless, you're not being mislynched this game since we're ending the game today.
In post 636, Raya36 wrote:I really need more from urich before calling him scum
In post 639, Raya36 wrote:What makes you say scum from what we have to work with so far?
He's done this whole 'hold cards close to chest' thing before in another game I've seen from him, but before it was still pretty clear he was at least trying to do something.
He has done nothing here except pop in once and throw a coalition out there before vanishing again.
In post 573, Pyrrha Nikos wrote:@mod, can you lynch on the same day you vote a coalition and how does this work?
a lynch can happen after a coalition resolves (and fails obviously). if a lynch is chosen before a coalition is chosen, the lynch will be 'on hold' so to speak until the coalition resolves, at which person the lynched person will be lynched and the day ends
'skitter is fucking terrifying' ~ town-bork about scum-me
'Skitter [was] terrifying to play against ngl' ~ scum-bork about town-me
'Going into lylo against scum!skit unprepared is like having someone force feed you dull razor blades. It's painful, and once it starts, you're pretty much dead' ~ NMSA
'Skitter you're a spirit animal's spirit animal' ~ slaxx
