BooneyToonz XII: Corporate Boontrigue (Game Over!!!)

skitter30 · Post Post #775 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 3:15 pm

In post 57, Almost50 wrote:
In post 47, popsofctown wrote:L.U.V. is a miller, but under his name it says he's also a "survivor", that makes it unfairly difficult to win as third party.
You know what? I'm never voting you this game (if I do, remind me of this post). I like a perceptive player (and I also feel guilty from last game).

In post 67, Almost50 wrote:Hmmm... maybe. Does your team have a Roleblocker?? I mean, this isn't a soft or anything, but the only way you leave me alive is by blocking me just in case.

In post 69, Almost50 wrote:
In post 68, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: Almost50
Town!Almost50 wouldn't be that afraid to drop a crumb like that.
Who's afraid? And if I was I wouldn't have brought it up.

In post 73, Almost50 wrote:I have no idea why people underestimate roster. The guy is an astute player as either alignment, and I've seen nothing AI from him as of yet.

In post 83, Almost50 wrote:
In post 80, Creature wrote:
In post 45, Almost50 wrote:
In post 43, Gamma Emerald wrote:Hi Creature. Are you town?
I she ever nowadays?
I'm not a she.
^Sexist^

town posts for you ^^^^^ not so much alone but like in sequence

and there's a lot more like them

it's really a tonal thing more than anything else idk; i can usually tell in a few posts; and if i'm not townreading u soonish i get worried

Almost50 · Post Post #776 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 3:21 pm

OK.. I guess I need to work on my scum game a little then.

So.. do you want me to put Titus @L-1 or would you rather not yet?

Titus · Post Post #777 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 3:25 pm

In post 468, the worst wrote:
VC 2.2
Bambi Jay (4)- Xtoxm, Titus, Clemency, Creature
Titus (3)- Bambi Jay, rosterfoster, Almost50
rosterfoster (1)- Asuka
Xtoxm (1)- Jesus Louisus
Almost50 (1)- UnaBombaH

Not voting (3)- Gamma Emerald, Lil Uzi Vert, Liger_Zero

With 13 alive it takes 7 to lynch.

Deadline is in (expired on 2019-06-04 22:00:00)

Mod notes: quack quack

In post 469, Titus wrote:Interesting....

Bambi Jesus Lurker scumteam?

In post 776, Almost50 wrote: OK.. I guess I need to work on my scum game a little then.

So.. do you want me to put Titus @L-1 or would you rather not yet?

Considering this L minus 1 because of life.

I am a roleblocker. I blocked Jesus last night.

skitter30 · Post Post #778 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 3:26 pm

i take it you townread me then?

theoretically i'm fine with a l-1 but i like just got here and i don't want the day to end yet; still need to sort some people and i wouldn't be surprised if lolhammers happened in this pl

Titus · Post Post #779 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 3:27 pm

In post 778, skitter30 wrote:i take it you townread me then?

theoretically i'm fine with a l-1 but i like just got here and i don't want the day to end yet; still need to sort some people and i wouldn't be surprised if lolhammers happened in this pl

That's why I claimed.

skitter30 · Post Post #780 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 3:28 pm

ye

i hink the claim is prob real but i don't think it's inherently town-indicative (and is prob. slightly more scum indicative idk)

why'd you block jl?

Bambi Jay · Post Post #781 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 3:30 pm

Roleblocker? That WOULD describe the need for a Strongman that Liger mentioned... But that also means claiming it in tandom with that knowledge is a safer bet.

Jeez this makes things weird.

skitter30 · Post Post #782 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 3:31 pm

right, idk if scum have a strongman and an rb

idk

@titus are you shot-limited or gated or anything?

Bambi Jay · Post Post #783 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 3:35 pm

Well Titus basically put the ball on Jesus with that. If he was a PR needing results he'd know she's legit but if he doesn't get pure results or indication of a roleblock we can't be sure.

Jesus Louisus · Post Post #784 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 3:46 pm

In post 783, Bambi Jay wrote:Well Titus basically put the ball on Jesus with that. If he was a PR needing results he'd know she's legit but if he doesn't get pure results or indication of a roleblock we can't be sure.

Bambi, rolefish much?

Bambi Jay · Post Post #785 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 3:50 pm

It's called "looking at the claim roleblocked to see if they can confirm or deny it".

Jesus Louisus · Post Post #786 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 3:53 pm

In post 785, Bambi Jay wrote:It's called "looking at the claim roleblocked to see if they can confirm or deny it".

Sorry, I can't be of assistance in that regard. But even if I could how would that settle Titus's alignment.

Bambi Jay · Post Post #787 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 3:55 pm

Oh for that we gotta wait until she answers why she chose you. But if we caught her lying it would've been SO much easier then this.

Almost50 · Post Post #788 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:02 pm

In post 777, Titus wrote:I am a roleblocker. I blocked Jesus last night.

Call me naive, but I don't think Scum!Titus ever fake claims Roleblocker of all possibilities, and think it even less likely that she claims her true role as scum! This has to be Town her.

Almost50 · Post Post #789 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:04 pm

In post 778, skitter30 wrote:i take it you townread me then?

Your reads make a lot of sense (the only one I am really against is Una), so I guess I do.

Almost50 · Post Post #790 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:09 pm

In post 780, skitter30 wrote:i hink the claim is prob real but i don't think it's inherently town-indicative (and is prob. slightly more scum indicative idk)

OK, not exactly arguing for/against you here, but I really want to try and see it your way:

Would scum!Titus "fake" her role as a RB? (I guess you already answered with "i think the claim is prob real"), so next question: You think scum!Titus (who is indeed a RB) tells us straight up that her role is RB?? I mean, the role itself is more commonly associated with the scum alignment(s), so why couldn't she have thought of ANYTHING better to claim (Jailkeeper comes to mind as a first choice for the RB to fake)

Almost50 · Post Post #791 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:13 pm

In post 782, skitter30 wrote:@titus are you shot-limited or gated or anything?

Well, I'm glad I am not the subject of your interrogation in this game.

skitter, in your quest to gain more knowledge in order to solve the game you always seem to forget scum are reading this thread too. WHY would we want them to know if our RB is gated?? I mean, they either assume she is and carry on and make her a potential mislynch in late game, or they assume she's not and then they shoot her at their own peril. But why would I want them to be sure which of the two is the right play for them??

Titus · Post Post #792 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:15 pm

In post 787, Bambi Jay wrote:Oh for that we gotta wait until she answers why she chose you. But if we caught her lying it would've been SO much easier then this.

Day 1 was a flash wagon. Jesus looked the scummiest to my gut based on the flip and votes.

Plus, I got to say I am going to Hell for stopping Jesus. Lol

Titus · Post Post #793 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:16 pm

No limits or gates.

Titus · Post Post #794 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:59 pm

In post 781, Bambi Jay wrote:Roleblocker? That WOULD describe the need for a Strongman that Liger mentioned... But that also means claiming it in tandom with that knowledge is a safer bet.

Jeez this makes things weird.

No it really isn't. I'm just town.

Jesus Louisus · Post Post #795 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 6:53 pm

UNVOTE:

Xtoxm · Post Post #796 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 11:04 pm

VOTE: roster

rosterfoster · Post Post #797 (ISO) » Mon May 27, 2019 11:36 pm

VOTE: Xtoxm

skitter30 · Post Post #798 (ISO) » Tue May 28, 2019 12:37 am

In post 784, Jesus Louisus wrote:
In post 783, Bambi Jay wrote:Well Titus basically put the ball on Jesus with that. If he was a PR needing results he'd know she's legit but if he doesn't get pure results or indication of a roleblock we can't be sure.
Bambi, rolefish much?

This is kinda bad

skitter30 · Post Post #799 (ISO) » Tue May 28, 2019 12:40 am

In post 790, Almost50 wrote:
In post 780, skitter30 wrote:i hink the claim is prob real but i don't think it's inherently town-indicative (and is prob. slightly more scum indicative idk)
OK, not exactly arguing for/against you here, but I really want to try and see it your way:

Would scum!Titus "fake" her role as a RB? (I guess you already answered with "i think the claim is prob real"), so next question: You think scum!Titus (who is indeed a RB) tells us straight up that her role is RB?? I mean, the role itself is more commonly associated with the scum alignment(s), so why couldn't she have thought of ANYTHING better to claim (Jailkeeper comes to mind as a first choice for the RB to fake)

Idk, why wouldn't she? If she's scum she might just want to claim the actual role so as to not get into a messy cc with anyone else

I asked if she was gated because i feel like a full rb is less likely to be scum, esp. If they have a strongman, that's a lot of power