Wow that's a lot of reads. Funny how wide of the mark you are with me, but maybe I'm coming across wrong. You might be able to share that in your group chat
e seems like he’d be more self-conscious if he was scum. On the one hand, claiming doctor could be a ballsy move as scum but it could also be a way for scum to ferret out PRs and get counter claims. If that’s the case, I wouldn’t expect his partner is too new to the game such that they couldn’t carry scum to the win if Saudade’s doctor claim is countered.
I stopped SRing Saudade over that. I now think this sort of thing is just what he does and that it's NAI at best. I should provided an updated reads list.
My schedule is tight RL right now, but I'll get around to it. The deadline for this day phase is paused until we get a replacement for the other missing player anyway, so we should be fine on that.
is using to ward off red role PMs, I need to get my hands on some of that. TTTT gets an automatic provisional town read for now.
Also Town:
Shashaddin
, I think we’re on the same side this time!
Provisionally Town:
Bobbyb85
had a scummy entrance and TTTT acknowledged it. Then TTTT excused the scummy entrance and I don’t disagree with his dismissal, except it could be scum!TTTT getting ahead of the problem by slathering himself in green paint and declaring his scum partner, Bobby to have an excusable scum entrance. For now, I’ll give them both a town pass.
Null:
Svetro
and
Powerbrand
. Need more content, please.
Null-to-scum:
Codis
, sorry buddy. You had a scummy entrance and according to the TTTTheory of newb scum greeting tells, this means you and/or Bobby are scum. Bobby’s digging his way out through posts. I suggest you do the same.
Null-to-scum:
Gimm1ck
is low-key on my radar. We’re just launching the game so pretty much everyone is low-key on my radar, but Gimm1ck seems a little scummy to me. Not even sure why. Just a feeling.
Scum:
Saudad
e seems like he’d be more self-conscious if he was scum. On the one hand, claiming doctor could be a ballsy move as scum but it could also be a way for scum to ferret out PRs and get counter claims. If that’s the case, I wouldn’t expect his partner is too new to the game such that they couldn’t carry scum to the win if Saudade’s doctor claim is countered.
All nice and all, but I have stated that d1 scumhunting from intros is unreliable.
Again, as I have said before, I prefer two current wagons running.
I am having a hard time understanding why you are repeatedly going after the use of into reads, even in this situation where the reads themselves really don't line up that heavily with the intros. Could you please explain further?
I assume you meant info reads?
My site of origination rarely, if ever, uses intros as anything more than RVS. We prefer info reading people based on hopping on wagons, starting wagons, counter wagons, and lack of substantial explanations of their actions.
If the info reads don't line up with their scummy/townie intro reads, we generally follow info reads over intro reads, because they are simply more substantial and reliable.
In post 218, Godmid wrote:
138 - Codis - Okay, so I really don't like this. If you were scum reading Bobby, questioning someone else's reasoning for town reading him would be totally reasonable. However, you haven't made any mention of scumreading him at this point, so this just comes across as trying to undermine a players town read without any understandable town motive.
I’m not following this thought process. Why does me not scum reading Bobby have anything to do with TTTT’s mention of Bobby.... like at all?
If someone is giving reasons for someone else being Town. And that reasoning seems weird to me. Then I’m absolutely going to point it out. My town notice here is pointing out how TTTTs post about Bobby “not being defensive” doesn’t make a lot of sense bc there was no reason for Bobby to even BE defensive.
To which TTTT has not followed up on. Sure I didn’t ask directly but I think ignoring certain comments like that are also worth noting.
Like, for example, this is townie because he provided substantial logic and reasoning for his course of action.
In post 235, TTTT wrote:@MJL
how about that post 215?
pretty great right?
It wasn't bad. It was enough to make me return to other work for the time being and set my TTTT scumhunt aside. Besides, I want to see if Zeebu or Godmid feel scummy.
In post 219, Godmid wrote:@MJL/@Sash - Can you both please explain as clearly as possible why you scum read Saudade?
1. Weird doc claim
2. Weird defensivenesss, last time I saw him he was more on the offensive as a vt...
3. Weird tone but can't quite describe it.
4. Posts 83, 98, 118.... He seemed to be on me before the real action came about.
*This was a draft i begun and saved while I was at work, but couldn't finish and post it. Now he's gone, but his slot is still a FoS for me.
Weird doc claim is scum indicative?
this is false reasoning that you are making up that makes sense, but doesnt make sense from a town perspective trying to honestly solve the game
Passion or coincidence once prompted you to say
"Pride will tear us both apart"
Well, now pride's gone out the window
Cross the rooftops, run away
In post 48, Saudade wrote:Would anyone object if I claim town doctor and clear myself for the day?
In post 243, Saudade wrote:Weird doc claim is scum indicative?
this is false reasoning that you are making up that makes sense, but doesnt make sense from a town perspective trying to honestly solve the game
It might not be scum indicative by itself, but when I ask myself what could be the motivation for a townie to type this... I find none! That's what I called it weird.
When I sum it up with the other things though, it makes a scumlean for you.
In post 177, Sashaddin wrote:I just remember you from my second game ever, where I was town and you've tunneled me (as a vt) to my end. Maybe I'm just wary it happens again, and subconsciously try to avoid this again...