Mini Normal 2076: Game Over

[Psyche]

i have a lot of townreads and that means i can lynch a lurker
who is lurking? LUV?

Pretty bad idea if you ask me, is there any reason to lynch a lurker over problematic slots?

i can sort the other ones!

[schadd_]

I mean I unvoted you, I don't think I do that unless I am thinking about something.

I don't know how you got from "DP unvoted" to "DP is trying to keep me in an unresolved 1v1"

You were acting like when I unvoted I was certain I wasn't just going to vote you again the next day... there's no reason for you to assume anything at all about how I feel about your slot so I don't know why you jumped to the conclusion that I was keeping you "unresolved"

if you mean you as a person unvote like that ......... i don't know who your main is, i don't think pink ball is NRG (ss sounded like a good guess from someone). if you mean someone generally unvotes like that.... i disagree, for instance the "i dont think lynching you is a good short term idea but idk who else to do right now" one i did after your ub claim

dp unvoted + seemed to still be sold that i'm scum without engaging with me ("pichu is probably town given that it's schadd leading the wagon" 823 sounded like it came from the assumption i'm scum). im not making assumptions about why you as town would unvote there, in fact i said as much & the unresolved wagon thing was specifically a scum tactic i thought you were using

[nomnomnom]

i have a lot of townreads and that means i can lynch a lurker
who is lurking? LUV?

Pretty bad idea if you ask me, is there any reason to lynch a lurker over problematic slots?

i can sort the other ones!

Sure, any solid case?

[Detective Pikachu]

dp unvoted + seemed to still be sold that i'm scum without engaging with me ("pichu is probably town given that it's schadd leading the wagon" 823 sounded like it came from the assumption i'm scum).

I guess I see why you were saying that more then, but 823 was actually more a point where I was trying to decide whether you were town with bad reads or scum. So actually you kinda have it backward, 823 wasn't me continuing to assume you are scum, it me starting to second guess myself. I did go back to you being scum after 831 given you seemed to want to goad me back into a 1v1 right when I had actually started to think you might be town, but I guess 831 being in response to your reversed interpretation of 823 does make your reaction there make slightly more sense

[schadd_]

Ok

[LuckyOtter]

VC 1.12

Redemption:

Psyche:

Performer:

Detective Pikachu, chennisden, MaryJoLisa

Not_Mafia:

Detective Pikachu:

Not_Mafia, Redemption, schadd_

nomnomnom:

chennisden:

nomnomnom, PenguinPower

LuckyOtter:

MaryJoLisa:

LuckyOtter

Vorkuta:

Lil Uzi Vert:

PenguinPower:

schadd_:

Vorkuta

Not Voting:

Psyche, Lil Uzi Vert, Performer

With

13

votes,

7

to lynch

Deadline: (expired on 2019-06-05 21:00:43)

This vote count is inaccurate as I voted DP in 1196

[nomnomnom]

So we're L-1?

[Detective Pikachu]

On the plus side Not_Mafia is already voting me

[LuckyOtter]

Yes it's l-1

[nomnomnom]

On the plus side Not_Mafia is already voting me

Scared of the hammer?

[Detective Pikachu]

Oh and Performer isn't voting me and he's the only counter-wagon

[Detective Pikachu]

Scared of the hammer?

Glad to see you've really taken a step back from shading me every single post

[Detective Pikachu]

Otter are you getting caught up in the last few pages or were you just commenting on the VC? -- which is appreciated

[nomnomnom]

Here's a little lesson: not every comment that involves you is a shade. And if it is, it's not necessarily a shade against

you

[Detective Pikachu]

Here's a little lesson: not every comment that involves you is a shade. And if it is, it's not necessarily a shade against

you

I'm not sure what you meant to convey with that comment then

[LuckyOtter]

Trying to catch up since I was last on. I'm not voting performer today unless in catching up I see something particularly compelling

[Detective Pikachu]

I mean he hasn't posted anything since the weekend began so that's not going to happen

[nomnomnom]

Here's a little lesson: not every comment that involves you is a shade. And if it is, it's not necessarily a shade against

you

I'm not sure what you meant to convey with that comment then

The first step is realizing that's what you've been doing with every single one of my statements and made a completely insane case because of it.

Do you see what I'm saying?

[Detective Pikachu]

Hey nomnom what's your read of schadd?

[nomnomnom]

I'm actually willing to take pressure off you as long as you admit that you've been extremely irrational and get a quick re-read and then we can have a clear discussion about what's been going this game, alright?

[nomnomnom]

Hey nomnom what's your read of schadd?

I'll only collaborate with you if you're willing to first calm down with all of this. Right now I think it serves no purpose to give you an answer.

[nomnomnom]

I have other wagons to push if we can come to a calmer state of mind. The ball is on your side.

[nomnomnom]

UNVOTE:

I'll even show some good faith.

[Detective Pikachu]

I mean I'm logging so

[LuckyOtter]

I just doubt that scum!nom goes this hard against town!DP when there was a perfectly good chance at getting Chenn lynched, or at least parking a vote on chen while town proceeds to lynch town!Dp. The only scenario in which this makes any sense to me is if it was some kind of distancing gambit from scum!chenn, but even then I think scum!nom parks a vote on chenn and fans the flames on DP. I don't see scum!nom here