open 759: house party (compleded)

[the worst]

Okay the more I think about the party mechanic the warmer I feel. I'll feel better when I have a more confident read on duppin and when EAF starts playing the game again. Presence read suggests he's partyscum so I'm gonna kinda trust him to play a bit harder if he's town in the party.

Fusco I'll have a better read on later but I still feel comfortable vaguely townreading him but.. yeah.. I suddenly feel the need to be more confident there as well..

still fine with IL.

[the worst]

EAF was here d1 and presenting reads and making noise. Post getting into the party I don't feel like he was very effective. He is currently a lurksack. This suggests to me his intent was to get into the party/be townread, not to find and lynch scum. Not a great read but you asked, so there you go.

[Inbred Lannisters]

Logic dictates that if there’s scum currently in the party, it’s not more than one, since for obvious reasons, scum doesn’t want any more than one of them in there.

So, odds are there probably is one in there, so they won’t want any more and if not, they will probably push for someone sketchy to be added.

I think playing close attention to the party voting will give us insight as to which.

If someone sketchy is pushed, then party is alltown, if there is extreme resistance to adding anyone, it could be because scum is currently in the party and has no need for any additions.

So the keep the party small argument, isn’t taking into account that it is contrary to scum’s interests to have more than one scum in there.

IOW, either the composition of the current party is pure or it isn’t. If it is and I’m currently having doubts on that, then adding no one, is the best strategy but if one scum is already in there, than it really isn’t.

~T

[Fuscosco]

My lynchpool is whoever is trying to grow the party

[Fuscosco]

The heal mechanic was real but the phase of the game where it was relevant is now over; it probably will not be used tomorrow.

hah! Joke's on you we have IL

[the worst]

My lynchpool is whoever is trying to grow the party

Do you think the current party is pure?

[Inbred Lannisters]

This is why we argued against the “housepets” strategy which would be really ideal for scum to hide out amongst the other likely mislynchbait. A party comprised of housepets, makes it virtually impossible to be able to figure out who scum is and of course, sets up all of the obvtown not in it to be sitting ducks basically.

That was what a lot of people were pushing for D1. Some not really understanding how housepets in the party are ideal for scum and probably some scum advocating for that.

~T

[Fuscosco]

EAF was here d1 and presenting reads and making noise. Post getting into the party I don't feel like he was very effective. He is currently a lurksack. This suggests to me his intent was to get into the party/be townread, not to find and lynch scum. Not a great read but you asked, so there you go.

Right. Assuming we are town we wont die.
Assuming he is town and we are not all town, he will eventually die and only needs to wait for it.
Assuming he is scum he wont be doing any NKs nor be reasonably lynched. I qualify it as reasonable because suddenly anything seems possible . . .

[Fuscosco]

My lynchpool is whoever is trying to grow the party

Do you think the current party is pure?

Gun to head and money on table? Yes, Im more confident than not.

[Fuscosco]

But IL is actually playing so erratically Im considering pre-making a case on them to drop in the game.

[Inbred Lannisters]

My lynchpool is whoever is trying to grow the party

Even it they’re consensus obvtown? Explain that please, I mean seriously.

~T

[the worst]

My lynchpool is whoever is trying to grow the party

Do you think the current party is pure?

Gun to head and money on table? Yes, Im more confident than not.

can you sell me on duppin and EAF?

[Titus]

I think adding no one is the best strategy regardless of alignment. (Well, I am excluding adding 3 random players, which we won't do.)

We know there's confscum outside the party. We should just lynch outside the party. If we find one scum, scum are forced to confirm where another scum is. This continues forward.

We protect TL as long as we keep the focus on those outside.

[the worst]

If you guys are ok with it I'd rather get Fusco's party reads than let you guys duke it out over party mechanics

[Fuscosco]

We.
Should.
Not.
Grow.
The.
Party.

Period.
Line Break.
Mechanically unsound.
Stop.
End line.
/Fin
Over.
Copy?

[Fuscosco]

If you guys are ok with it I'd rather get Fusco's party reads than let you guys duke it out over party mechanics

Ive given my reads.

[Skygazer]

i mean technically if we put tw in and he's town and the other four members are town then it turns from potential auto to actually auto : ]

[the worst]

"there's confscum" of 1-3/8 players is like saying there's likely to be two scum in an 8p game.. :/ Ugh I'm not going down the mechanical rabbithole..this conversation is annoying and not productive.

[the worst]

If you guys are ok with it I'd rather get Fusco's party reads than let you guys duke it out over party mechanics

Ive given my reads.

I haven't seen them and I have discomfort about half the party, which you townread. So... sell me?

[Inbred Lannisters]

But IL is actually playing so erratically Im considering pre-making a case on them to drop in the game.

Then you’re being a WOAT because in what world is adding consensus obvtown to the party good for scum and harmful to town? Answer ( to anyone not needing a building to fall on them): It’s not.

~T

[Skygazer]

i think we should talk about mechanics for like 78 more pages tbh

[Fuscosco]

WOAT

wat?

[Fuscosco]

i think we should talk about mechanics for like 78 more pages tbh

Theyre spamming their way to front and center.

[the worst]

WOAT

wat?

worst of all time

[Fuscosco]

I have to get up for work in 6 hours. And I only got home and hour ago. Can I do this later