I am pushing you with things you did say, though, and you lying or misrepresenting things you said is important to understanding your alignment. You now want to make it seem that you don't think a vig killed eyes, even though that's pretty clearly what you were thinking in
1577. Even if I'm wrong on everything else, why did you not just say "oh I thought maybe it was vig at that time but then I changed my mind." Instead you insist you never said you were pushing the vig angle when that just seems objectively false.
It feels like you're heavily backpedaling and playing up AtE even though that's totally unnecessary; Alchemist21 was entertaining the vig angle at the same time, it's not like "there's definitely not a second vig" was an unreasonable position. Hell, maybe there even IS a second vig, but your insistence now that you don't and NEVER thought there was a second vig seems scummy AF. It feels like you're trying to reconstruct the meaning of
1577 just because I was pushing you for seeming to soft vig, and reconstructing the meaning of a post to work against a push is explicitly scummy.