They went out of their way to point out they had no reads. That is a great way to get negative attention and pressure on you as scum, and it's completely avoidable because coming up with fake reads is very easy.
Their follow-up explanation about forgetting reads feels genuine too. Scum care a lot more about consistency whereas town just say whatever they're feeling at the time.
the wagon on our slot is trash because none of the voters have a proper case
this most likely implies at least one voter is scum
but i don't remember the voters
In post 559, TeamWorldwide wrote:i said i had "barely any reads"
+ i keep forgetting my reads as town because i dont have a good memory :/ especially in a hydra game
i mean that's fine but
do you still think the post you fos'd is scummy? wb the rest of gamma's content?
i would need to iso dive because i don't even remember the post you're talking about oops
then lmk when u follow up
Inferno390 wrote:
In post 61, RadiantTroubadour wrote:What I'm saying is I have no idea how to interpret anyone's posting thus far in this game in reaction to the things that I've said.
Katy, this is a good example of it I think
However, that list does help my perception. It makes more sense. Thanks.
meh that seems kind of normal for him but sure
alo np
TeamWorldwide wrote:the wagon on our slot is trash because none of the voters have a proper case
this most likely implies at least one voter is scum
but i don't remember the voters
cases are scummy. wig!
hydra of RadiantCowbells and gigabyteTroubadour/Katyusha
"Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL
“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion
They went out of their way to point out they had no reads. That is a great way to get negative attention and pressure on you as scum, and it's completely avoidable because coming up with fake reads is very easy.
Their follow-up explanation about forgetting reads feels genuine too. Scum care a lot more about consistency whereas town just say whatever they're feeling at the time.
I think your reasoning is garbage.
Provide me an alternative wagon of equal or greater value.
In post 549, Inferno390 wrote:Ok.
I think I can put Jingle and Austerity firmly in my town reads.
Unoriginal reads. They were already in my townbloc.
In post 550, Inferno390 wrote:Azorius reads really trolly and distracting. Not liking it.
Also the fact that tn has chosen to actively disengage from me, after all of the nonsense he said about me “ thinking he was a threat,” has me putting slot as scum for now.
Scumreading two different players in the same post, impressive.
In post 551, Inferno390 wrote:RC seems tonally off. Somehow he seems different than when I’ve played against RC!town before.
Gonna keep an eye on the slot.
Another scumread.
Get better posts pls.
Lol all of these points are garbage, unoriginal reads aren't a scumtell and multiple scumreads certainly aren't.
Do you guys hear that? It sounds like a chainsaw to me.
In post 588, Austerity wrote:My reasoning is not garbage and is instead based on significant experience.
First of all:
I'm not caught up with the game/I don't have strong reads yet isn't an AI statement from pretty much anyone, unless you have specific meta experience to back that up.
Lack of consistency as a towntell is :/ unless you have specific meta experience to back that up.
If you have specific meta experience to defend with here, please, share with the class.
In post 549, Inferno390 wrote:Ok.
I think I can put Jingle and Austerity firmly in my town reads.
Unoriginal reads. They were already in my townbloc.
In post 550, Inferno390 wrote:Azorius reads really trolly and distracting. Not liking it.
Also the fact that tn has chosen to actively disengage from me, after all of the nonsense he said about me “ thinking he was a threat,” has me putting slot as scum for now.
Scumreading two different players in the same post, impressive.
In post 551, Inferno390 wrote:RC seems tonally off. Somehow he seems different than when I’ve played against RC!town before.
Gonna keep an eye on the slot.
Another scumread.
Get better posts pls.
Lol all of these points are garbage, unoriginal reads aren't a scumtell and multiple scumreads certainly aren't.
Do you guys hear that? It sounds like a chainsaw to me.
So I’m scum with Gamma now huh?
"Do I have permission to....refute some of the bs that Inferno just spewed out?"--TywinL
“Does anyone know if Inferno is prone to going of on huge tangents of twisted logic regarding basically alignment neutral posting? Asking for a friend ...”—MagnaofIllusion
In post 589, Jingle wrote:Really? Cause this doesn't suggest to me that you prefer any wagon, considering neither of your suspects are being voted and you're not voting anyone.
You are correct. If I had a strong preference for who I wanted lynched, I'd be voting them. That's why I used the terminology "probably willing to wagon" and not "want to lynch."
Unfortunately, there's no way to express a strong preference for who you don't want lynched besides, you know, yelling at people.
In post 589, Jingle wrote:Really? Cause this doesn't suggest to me that you prefer any wagon, considering neither of your suspects are being voted and you're not voting anyone.
You are correct. If I had a strong preference for who I wanted lynched, I'd be voting them. That's why I used the terminology "probably willing to wagon" and not "want to lynch."
Unfortunately, there's no way to express a strong preference for who you don't want lynched besides, you know, yelling at people.
All I get from this is that you think not lynching > lynching TWW, which I disagree with fundamentally.
In post 589, Jingle wrote:Really? Cause this doesn't suggest to me that you prefer any wagon, considering neither of your suspects are being voted and you're not voting anyone.
You are correct. If I had a strong preference for who I wanted lynched, I'd be voting them. That's why I used the terminology "probably willing to wagon" and not "want to lynch."
Unfortunately, there's no way to express a strong preference for who you don't want lynched besides, you know, yelling at people.
All I get from this is that you think not lynching > lynching TWW, which I disagree with fundamentally.
I actually thought it was universally agreed upon that not lynching the first day gives scum the advantage.
But Jingle, where are you seeing that Austerity wants a no lynch?
