Mini 2091: The Purge - Game Over!

Iconeum · Post Post #475 (ISO) » Sun Jul 28, 2019 9:39 pm

In post 473, Carl Tuckerson wrote:He's literally done it before

fine, link me the game?

Carl Tuckerson · Post Post #476 (ISO) » Sun Jul 28, 2019 9:41 pm

Not doing your homework for you

Iconeum · Post Post #477 (ISO) » Sun Jul 28, 2019 9:52 pm

In post 476, Carl Tuckerson wrote:Not doing your homework for you

Ok, so I just meta'd him. It's not there. You are eating rope after Hectic.

Carl Tuckerson · Post Post #478 (ISO) » Sun Jul 28, 2019 9:57 pm

You oughta go to law school if you can read that fast.
I stand by my townread on Hectic and I maintain that your explanation of that sequence of events is absurd

Carl Tuckerson · Post Post #479 (ISO) » Sun Jul 28, 2019 10:00 pm

Going to bed
VOTE: Iconeum

Iconeum · Post Post #480 (ISO) » Sun Jul 28, 2019 10:10 pm

In post 479, Carl Tuckerson wrote:Going to bed
VOTE: Iconeum

juicy

Persivul · Post Post #481 (ISO) » Sun Jul 28, 2019 11:21 pm

In post 441, Carl Tuckerson wrote:@all: What are the rules on posting known information from an ongoing game? Hectic has flipped in one that hasn't finished yet and I don't know the extent to which I can cite that game to make a point here. Sorry if this is already too much.

Don't do it. The fact that he has flipped changes nothing.

Persivul · Post Post #482 (ISO) » Sun Jul 28, 2019 11:23 pm

Votecount 1.2

Iconeum (3): Formerfish, Delta Klim, Carl Tuckerson
Gandalf (1): Egduf
Most Serene (1): TiphaineDeath
TiphaineDeath (2): Gandalf, Oversoul
Egduf (1): Menalque
Formerfish (1): EspressoPatronum
EspressoPatronum (1): Most Serene

Not voting (3) - Tet, Iconeum, Hectic

With 13 alive, it takes 7 votes to strand.

NOTE: I will be away on a previously scheduled camping trip with no internet access starting the afternoon of Thu 8.1 Until sometime on Sun 8.4. My apologies for interference to the game.

(expired on 2019-08-01 05:30:00) remain until day end

Egduf · Post Post #483 (ISO) » Mon Jul 29, 2019 12:28 am

I agree with Carl. I think Hectic’s “scum slip” is the Towniest thing he’s done so far. It’s moved him up to a town read for me. I don’t think Icon’s reaction is scummy though, deliberately playing scummy as Town for a joke is a weird move, and being suspicious of that is fine.

Gandalf · Post Post #484 (ISO) » Mon Jul 29, 2019 12:46 am

In post 483, Egduf wrote:I agree with Carl. I think Hectic’s “scum slip” is the Towniest thing he’s done so far. It’s moved him up to a town read for me. I don’t think Icon’s reaction is scummy though, deliberately playing scummy as Town for a joke is a weird move, and being suspicious of that is fine.

Why is Hectic doing hilarious scumslip comedy to entertain us all, a particularly more townie thing to do than all his other posts - particularly as he does this as part of his playstyle? I cant see how that could have really infuenced your view on him one way or the other?

Hectic · Post Post #485 (ISO) » Mon Jul 29, 2019 12:52 am

In post 414, Hectic wrote:
In post 413, Oversoul wrote:
In post 411, Hectic wrote:I can see Serene being scum -
but only with me
, town otherwise, so only a slight scumlean
Huh?
Uhhhh...
little
bit of a scumslip there. Disregard that
immediately
please.

No, but I should probably clarify that was a joke before it wastes too much discussion.

This was part of the joke.

Agree with Egfuj that Icon's reaction isn't

weird

, and their reluctance to look into past games isn't scum!Icon who doesn't want to admit their scumread is wrong.

Curious

about 477 though, and the fact they're trying to use "Uhhhh...

little

bit of a scumslip there. Disregard that

immediately

please.." as a reason for scumreading me, thought it was kinda clear that was sarcasm (but it's not always obvious over text). I don't think my "scumslips" are town-indicative as Gandalf says though, I'd

probably

do them as scum as well.

Menalque · Post Post #486 (ISO) » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:03 am

I mean, icon has a fair-to-decent chance of being scum but I don’t get why we’re trying to strand that when we have egduf who has an

excellent

chance of being scum

I’ll case if I have to, but honestly it would be a lot easier if you could all just sheep me/read her ISO and just vote there

Menalque · Post Post #487 (ISO) » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:05 am

I don’t even see how hectic’s thing could be called a scumslip tbh? And I’m v confused about why we’re getting so hung up on it, unless it’s being pushed from scum to distract from the obvscum in our midst, i.e. egduf

Iconeum · Post Post #488 (ISO) » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:07 am

are you guys for real

Iconeum · Post Post #489 (ISO) » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:09 am

In post 485, Hectic wrote:
In post 414, Hectic wrote:
In post 413, Oversoul wrote:
In post 411, Hectic wrote:I can see Serene being scum -
but only with me
, town otherwise, so only a slight scumlean
Huh?
Uhhhh...
little
bit of a scumslip there. Disregard that
immediately
please.

No, but I should probably clarify that was a joke before it wastes too much discussion.
This was part of the joke.

Agree with Egfuj that Icon's reaction isn't
weird
, and their reluctance to look into past games isn't scum!Icon who doesn't want to admit their scumread is wrong.
Curious
about 477 though, and the fact they're trying to use "Uhhhh...
little
bit of a scumslip there. Disregard that
immediately
please.." as a reason for scumreading me, thought it was kinda clear that was sarcasm (but it's not always obvious over text). I don't think my "scumslips" are town-indicative as Gandalf says though, I'd
probably
do them as scum as well.

This is the entire thing. It wasn't intended as a joke. If it was a joke, he would come out saying it was a joke after some pressure for the joke slip. He didn't. He calls it a little scumslip himself and asks to dismiss it.

It's not until later that he tries to twist it as a joke.

Menalque · Post Post #490 (ISO) » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:12 am

How is it even a scumslip in the first place?

Iconeum · Post Post #491 (ISO) » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:12 am

Meh, I can't force anyone to scumread it but I am surprised that you TOWNREAD him for it

Iconeum · Post Post #492 (ISO) » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:12 am

In post 486, Menalque wrote:I mean, icon has a fair-to-decent chance of being scum but I don’t get why we’re trying to strand that when we have egduf who has an
excellent
chance of being scum

I’ll case if I have to, but honestly it would be a lot easier if you could all just sheep me/read her ISO and just vote there

what's up with egduf?

Iconeum · Post Post #493 (ISO) » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:14 am

In post 484, Gandalf wrote:
In post 483, Egduf wrote:I agree with Carl. I think Hectic’s “scum slip” is the Towniest thing he’s done so far. It’s moved him up to a town read for me. I don’t think Icon’s reaction is scummy though, deliberately playing scummy as Town for a joke is a weird move, and being suspicious of that is fine.
Why is Hectic doing hilarious scumslip comedy to entertain us all, a particularly more townie thing to do than all his other posts - particularly as he does this as part of his playstyle? I cant see how that could have really infuenced your view on him one way or the other?

Yeah i'd love an explanation for why it's a TOWN thing to do as well.

Menalque · Post Post #494 (ISO) » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:15 am

She’s being active but not actually contributing anything, the votes all felt like they were there to show “hey guys look I’m putting pressure on people which is pro-town!” rather than from any conviction

Menalque · Post Post #495 (ISO) » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:15 am

Like I said I can case her if I need to but honestly look at her ISO and tell me you think it comes from town

Menalque · Post Post #496 (ISO) » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:16 am

Also I think the entire lack of reaction to my push comes more from scum hoping it’ll blow over than from town, especially after I explicitly asked her about it and she ignored it

Iconeum · Post Post #497 (ISO) » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:18 am

In post 17, Egduf wrote:Hi everyone!
I noticed that last game 6 townies died, most of which announced they were going to shoot rather than barricade during the night, let’s try and avoid that mistake.

In post 486, Menalque wrote:I mean, icon has a fair-to-decent chance of being scum but I don’t get why we’re trying to strand that when we have egduf who has an
excellent
chance of being scum

I’ll case if I have to, but honestly it would be a lot easier if you could all just sheep me/read her ISO and just vote there

you scumreading me for my push on Hectic?

Iconeum · Post Post #498 (ISO) » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:19 am

oops ignore that first quote, was starting reading egduf ISO

Iconeum · Post Post #499 (ISO) » Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:21 am

In post 496, Menalque wrote:Also I think the entire lack of reaction to my push comes more from scum hoping it’ll blow over than from town, especially after I explicitly asked her about it and she ignored it

'your push' being the first couple of posts from eg?