![Image](http://i.imgur.com/pIRfX6h.png)
![Image](http://i.imgur.com/pIRfX6h.png)
What would have been the advantage of doing this? You had already outed the hood!Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:See? This question alone makes you scummy af in light of what I had said and also the game status.In post 1814, ofrhz wrote:Also if we’re going to start discussing about our hood amongst us now, why did you think there was only 0-1 scum in the hood when you weren’t townreading any one of usIn post 1810, ofrhz wrote:Where did I deflectIn post 1796, Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:D1L response to me "hinting" at the neighborhood is townie. Gork's is NAI but he is being lazy. ofrhz' deflected and then tried to pass me as a suspect of hers.
I’ve said why I scumread you but I don’t know why you scumread me
And you explicitly stated gork was “not a townread” at the time
What do you benefit from asking this NOW and here when I just said I'd be down to talk to D1L in the hood.. the same hood you are in. Why would you not hold off until it's time and place we all discussed this further? Do you think if you die overnight that neither of Gork/D1L will mention what happened in the hood?
<snip>
Now back to you: WHY ask THIS question NOW rather than wait for the night to fall and hit me with all you've got in the hood, with the support of two players who would be suspicious as well? D1L already outed his suspicions in this thread and The Wall naturally SRs my play in general.
Did you want to talk about this here? Or is this [redacted]Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:There's stuff I'm not at liberty of talking about rn, relating to someone else's actions/behaviour that I am attributing ofrhz' behaviour here to. Trust me, I have a valid reason to consider her for scum doing this particular thing.In post 1988, Flavor Leaf wrote:@JJD - don’t fall into the ScumOfhrz trap. That’s what scum want people to think.
I outed who the hood members were. I didn't out the roles/function of it, and to explain why IO thought 0-1 scum were in this hood I'd have had to say something like what I just did in my previous post in this PT. Like; "you don't give scum multiple 1-shot Doctor of unknown sanity roles". How was I to answer your question otherwise?
Because -assuming you're town- you know some other players (who are also likely town from your own PoV) didn't want to out the roles yet. Because EVEN IF PUSH COME TO SHOVE and you are the N1 NK (I don't see how this could even be a realistic assumption) there are at least 2 other townies who will be able to convey each and every word said in here to the main thread tomorrow.
Not really, I'm just not seeing how our rolesIn post 9, Day One Wagon wrote:Ofrhz, do you think scum would have additional abilities to their 1-shot doc in our hood? Cause I still believe that giving scum 2 of these 1-shot docs would be punishing them really hard
And you wonder why I'm calling you out?? Ram has been clear enough he wasn't touching the "50/50" between FL & Peliocan with a barge pole (i.e.. wasn't voting Pelican this century), and having "no thoughts" on Gork is "shrugging off responsibility". On top of that you picked me to state a SR on? Yeah, all the hood is scum then. Let's let's JJD and if he flips green I can go for Gork or D1: because I have no thoughts and no idea what their stances are.
It's 1-shot and you don't know what you get, unless you're last man in hood, so not really usable early onIn post 12, ofrhz wrote:Not really, I'm just not seeing how our rolesIn post 9, Day One Wagon wrote:Ofrhz, do you think scum would have additional abilities to their 1-shot doc in our hood? Cause I still believe that giving scum 2 of these 1-shot docs would be punishing them really hardaren'tstrong for scum
Sane - Doc
Paranoid - JK
Naive - does nothing
CPR - Basically a vig
You're either bad ir really bad for this regardless of your alignment.
Because it did look like a scum slip and ANYONE should have harboured some level of suspicion the way things went. Unless you believed BOTH FL & pops were scum, and then it would be overly ridiculous they'd double tag team on Pelican of all players to get him lynched like that.
Redacted, but I get the feeling you should be bale to make an educated assumption of what I'm talking about.In post 6, ofrhz wrote:Subject: Detective Penguin & City of Fogport [Night 1]
Did you want to talk about this here? Or is this [redacted]Judge Joseph Dredd wrote:There's stuff I'm not at liberty of talking about rn, relating to someone else's actions/behaviour that I am attributing ofrhz' behaviour here to. Trust me, I have a valid reason to consider her for scum doing this particular thing.In post 1988, Flavor Leaf wrote:@JJD - don’t fall into the ScumOfhrz trap. That’s what scum want people to think.