In post 774, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I think limiting the lynch pool solely to those who were in the failed coalition is more likely to lead to a town loss.
We're not doing it the whole game, just starting there day 1.
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
In post 777, EspressoPatronum wrote:NC-LUV
- NC clearly didn't understand the purpose of voting within the coalition, so it's possible they would try to put both scum in the coalition + try convincing people to vote outside of it.
...
Unlikely Pairings:
(In progress, but it's pretty much all of the in-coalition pairs)
Huh?
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
In post 777, EspressoPatronum wrote:NC-LUV
- NC clearly didn't understand the purpose of voting within the coalition, so it's possible they would try to put both scum in the coalition + try convincing people to vote outside of it.
...
Unlikely Pairings:
(In progress, but it's pretty much all of the in-coalition pairs)
Huh?
What about this do you not understand? I'm happy to elaborate, but I need a more specific response first.
In post 806, RC most awesomest wrote:I'll probably get scumread for saying this but I think it's pretty unfair to scum to have the deadline extended here.
NAI imo. It's a reasonable opinion coming from town or scum.
In post 777, EspressoPatronum wrote:NC-LUV
- NC clearly didn't understand the purpose of voting within the coalition, so it's possible they would try to put both scum in the coalition + try convincing people to vote outside of it.
...
Unlikely Pairings:
(In progress, but it's pretty much all of the in-coalition pairs)
Huh?
What about this do you not understand? I'm happy to elaborate, but I need a more specific response first.
@Gamma
Nvm, I think I see what you were getting at. Were you highlighting NC-LUV as being an in-coalition pair? If yes, that's the only in-coalition pairing I thought was likely. The others fall into Unlikely Pairings, hence the "pretty much all" but not "all" in-coalition pairings being unlikely.
In post 806, RC most awesomest wrote:I'll probably get scumread for saying this but I think it's pretty unfair to scum to have the deadline extended here.
gotta agree with you there
like of course town are going to want an extension given how long we took to decide on a coalition
lpart of scum's strat today could be delaying the resolution of an agreed upon coalition so that there's not a lot of time to discuss a lynch
and this extension effectively negates that
though the fact Sky has given an extension probably means the scum weren't actively trying to delay a coalition for near deadline lynch strats, since she'd be a lot less likely to give it then if they were discussing that in their PT
In post 811, Hectic wrote:though the fact Sky has given an extension probably means the scum weren't actively trying to delay a coalition for near deadline lynch strats, since she'd be a lot less likely to give it then if they were discussing that in their PT
point still stands though
actually this depends on if LUV is scum. they'd be all for an extension if he is since he was the likely lynch
In post 517, Spangled wrote:Actually, I want a readslist from everyone, including would/would not include in coalition.
My thinking rn
Town, would include in coalition: myself, RCMA, Spangled, EP
Town, would not include in coalition: Hectic OR Alchemist, YAG
Null: NC 39
Scum: LUV, Hectic OR Alchemist
Fyi YAG is in the tier she is because I don't think anyone has discussed her as a coalition option and I'm trying to be mindful of the collective here.
remind me why you wanted one of me and Alchemist in but you weren't sure which one of us?
i think i know why but i want to hear from you
In post 777, EspressoPatronum wrote:NC-LUV
- NC clearly didn't understand the purpose of voting within the coalition, so it's possible they would try to put both scum in the coalition + try convincing people to vote outside of it.
...
Unlikely Pairings:
(In progress, but it's pretty much all of the in-coalition pairs)
Huh?
What about this do you not understand? I'm happy to elaborate, but I need a more specific response first.
Pretty sure NC 39 and LUV were both in the coalition? Am I misunderstanding the second part?
(Btw random aside, I fucking hate my phone, it'll do a think where it'll lag and then repeat my last 2 or 3 keystrokes multiple times, and it just did it to where it filled the text window)
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
In post 777, EspressoPatronum wrote:NC-LUV
- NC clearly didn't understand the purpose of voting within the coalition, so it's possible they would try to put both scum in the coalition + try convincing people to vote outside of it.
...
Unlikely Pairings:
(In progress, but it's pretty much all of the in-coalition pairs)
Huh?
What about this do you not understand? I'm happy to elaborate, but I need a more specific response first.
@Gamma
Nvm, I think I see what you were getting at. Were you highlighting NC-LUV as being an in-coalition pair? If yes, that's the only in-coalition pairing I thought was likely. The others fall into Unlikely Pairings, hence the "pretty much all" but not "all" in-coalition pairings being unlikely.
Okay, just an exception, thanks.
@Hectic, I had you and Alchemist as either town or scum, not thinking you were both the same alignment, and also not having a lean on one being worse than the other, because I felt you both looked pretty bad. So I actually wanted neither of you in my coalition, which I explicitly wrote out so why did you misread it?
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
In post 813, Hectic wrote:hey Gamma, what's your response to Espresso?'s case on you?
I think his analysis is accurate but I think I haven't been very actively scummy si that should also be considered. I've kinda been wanting to kick into gear or something but I feel at this point I'm gonna need a kick outside of being pushed
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
In post 806, RC most awesomest wrote:I'll probably get scumread for saying this but I think it's pretty unfair to scum to have the deadline extended here.
In post 813, Hectic wrote:hey Gamma, what's your response to Espresso?'s case on you?
I think his analysis is accurate but I think I haven't been very actively scummy si that should also be considered. I've kinda been wanting to kick into gear or something but I feel at this point I'm gonna need a kick outside of being pushed
Which part of my analysis?
Also, I don’t think Gamma’s going through today, and I see their point on not being very ‘actively scummy’, so I could push them off the table for today; I’m willing to VOTE: Alchemist
