Alisae V Pine: Trees Apparently Make Good Treestumps

Pine · Post Post #3975 (ISO) » Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:18 pm

[quote=“Site Rules]Do not bring outside influences into the game - this includes threats, bribes, wagers, promises, "trust tells", alliances, etc. Using knowledge from previous games is perfectly acceptable, but try not to carry grudges from one game to another.[/quote]
The rule discusses outside influences - this is clearly internal. This is meant to ban things like throwing games to win external bets.

But sure, let’s get PP or Maria to weigh in.

Alisae · Post Post #3976 (ISO) » Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:20 pm

MY POST WAS A JOKE

Alisae · Post Post #3977 (ISO) » Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:20 pm

YOU WERE SUPPOSED TO LAUGH

PenguinPower · Post Post #3978 (ISO) » Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:22 pm

PenguinPower · Post Post #3979 (ISO) » Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:22 pm

So...this is going to be fun.

PenguinPower · Post Post #3980 (ISO) » Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:23 pm

In post 3975, Pine wrote:But sure, let’s get PP or Maria to weigh in.

Not happening - we're in the game and stuff...rules, yadda yadda

popsofctown · Post Post #3981 (ISO) » Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:23 pm

I don't like a slot choosing between losing win% in this game and having an ugly sig in his next game. :/ I'm probably the most square one here, though.

PenguinPower · Post Post #3982 (ISO) » Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:25 pm

Purely personal opinion: Don't do sig bets in game.

Aristophanes · Post Post #3983 (ISO) » Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:25 pm

Well I missed a lot of interesting stuff that's not worth commenting on...

DGB

might

be scum gambiting to save scummate xof tbh.

Or scummate mastina.

Whichever seemed most viable at the time.

I mean, think about it. We start honing wagons and suddenly DGB distracts the entire thread with this selfvote that is probably going to dissipate and leave us with no momentum. It feels wrong.

I'd rather get the xof/mastina scum first because if DGB is gambiting like this it is obviously to save a more important role or player. It's rather brilliant imo!

Alisae · Post Post #3984 (ISO) » Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:26 pm

oh no dgb saved her scum buddy by one day oh no

Alisae · Post Post #3985 (ISO) » Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:26 pm

ari where does the quote from your sig come from

PenguinPower · Post Post #3986 (ISO) » Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:27 pm

Duck is town.

Why are we discussing Duck?

Aristophanes · Post Post #3987 (ISO) » Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:27 pm

Are ppl for serious about the sig bet?

Iirc it is def against the rules.

PenguinPower · Post Post #3988 (ISO) » Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:28 pm

Seems like something to let go and not focus on

Jingle · Post Post #3989 (ISO) » Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:28 pm

In post 3975, Pine wrote: The rule discusses outside influences - this is clearly internal. This is meant to ban things like throwing games to win external bets.

But sure, let’s get PP or Maria to weigh in.

FWIW, I agree that your bet is harmless. I just don't like risking the WRATH OF ZORASTER over easily avoidable things.

Aristophanes · Post Post #3990 (ISO) » Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:29 pm

In post 3985, Alisae wrote:ari where does the quote from your sig come from

I believe it was the Pokémon Battle Discord channel or thread. I was debating a meme vs a real team makeup and found this quote impeccably on point!

<3

Dannflor · Post Post #3991 (ISO) » Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:29 pm

In post 3981, popsofctown wrote:I don't like a slot choosing between losing win% in this game and having an ugly sig in his next game. :/ I'm probably the most square one here, though.

I bet I can out-square you

popsofctown · Post Post #3992 (ISO) » Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:31 pm

In post 3991, Dannflor wrote:
In post 3981, popsofctown wrote:I don't like a slot choosing between losing win% in this game and having an ugly sig in his next game. :/ I'm probably the most square one here, though.
I bet I can out-square you

IDK man I've been leashing fruit, asking the mod excessive rules clarification posts, thinking about getting into correcting other people's grammar soon, it might be a hard fight Dannflor

MariaR · Post Post #3993 (ISO) » Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:32 pm

In post 3980, PenguinPower wrote:
In post 3975, Pine wrote:But sure, let’s get PP or Maria to weigh in.
Not happening - we're in the game and stuff...rules, yadda yadda

^

MariaR · Post Post #3994 (ISO) » Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:33 pm

VOTE: DGB

Alisae · Post Post #3995 (ISO) » Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:33 pm

hello MariaR

how are u 2 day

Aristophanes · Post Post #3996 (ISO) » Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:37 pm

In post 3984, Alisae wrote:oh no dgb saved her scum buddy by one day oh no

DGB didn't do anything D1. DGB looks scummy today. But DGB looks like they are being scummy to attract attention amd distract the thread.

Am I wrong? What makes you think this??

Formerfish · Post Post #3997 (ISO) » Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:38 pm

In post 3983, Aristophanes wrote:Well I missed a lot of interesting stuff that's not worth commenting on...

DGB
might
be scum gambiting to save scummate xof tbh.

Or scummate mastina.

Whichever seemed most viable at the time.

I mean, think about it. We start honing wagons and suddenly DGB distracts the entire thread with this selfvote that is probably going to dissipate and leave us with no momentum. It feels wrong.

I'd rather get the xof/mastina scum first because if DGB is gambiting like this it is obviously to save a more important role or player. It's rather brilliant imo!

Ok, who are you and what did you do with scum!Ari?

Krazy · Post Post #3998 (ISO) » Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:38 pm

Welcome back Penguin!

How have you been?

Also, what do you think about fishy?

MariaR · Post Post #3999 (ISO) » Tue Sep 17, 2019 3:39 pm

In post 3995, Alisae wrote:hello MariaR

how are u 2 day

Very sick. Kinda just wanting today to be over so I can start reading again on day 3. DGB is never a bad lynch imo. Although idk if Pine would pick DGB for scum because last time I've played with DGB scum they've been obvious everytime