In post 5813, the worst wrote:tl;dr you want me lynched but don't really know what makes me scummy right?
No on every account.
I want Aristophanes lynched.
I want Krazy lynched.
I want Firebringer lynched.
And when all three are dead you'd be a top pick for a lynch but then and only then--and it's not because I don't know what makes you scummy, I know EXACTLY what makes you be scummy. It's that I have trouble verbalizing it, I have trouble putting it into words, it's effort and time that I very much rather not expend because it's not in my nature to want to try and figure out a way to try and vocalize the concept in my head which I lack the words to describe to others. I have the concept of my scumread on you locked down and know precisely what it is. I just don't know how to explain that read to others.
Similar logic applies to Aristophanes, Krazy, and Firebringer, too, to some extent. The full reasons for them being scum I have in my head, I just can't figure out how to explain it all. The difference being that with you while I don't have much in the way of ability to explain it, at least with them I have things I can kindof sortof more or less get out even if I'm only getting out a small portion of it.
Basically, with Aristophanes/Krazy/Firebringer I can explain like...20-35% of my cases on them; with you I can explain like...5-8% of my case on you.
You're not only a weaker scumread, you're also a harder scumread to explain.
You being a weaker scumread that is harder to explain doesn't mean the scumread has no reasons, it means exactly what it means:
You take more effort to explain for a read which is less likely to be correct.
That doesn't mean the read doesn't exist and that doesn't mean the reasons don't exist.
And it's incredibly disingenuous of you to be pushing this angle especially when you fucking know my personality and how I fucking operate.
