01. Kerset *
02. Billy Pilgrim
03. Nezahualpilli *
04. Farkran
05. Evenstar *
06. Karnage
07. the worst (SE)
08. ofrhz (SE)
09. Micc (SE)
*denotes prod, -denotes nudge
So why are you skipping RVS this game? Because it looked like you participated in it last time. Also, how do you possibly have a Lynch target four posts in?In post 9, Farkran wrote:Hello everyone.
I hate RVS, so i'm going to entirely skip that phase. Allow me to introduce myself:
I am Farkran, this is my second game in this site, but i have been playing FMs a long time ago elsewhere. Last game i was a mason.
Misc info:
- i am from italy, native language italian, i'm active most of the day but i will be sleeping during CEST nighttime.
- my meta is to talk a lot and getting others to talk. I attention-whore the game hard and usually die very early. I do this both as town and scum.
- i have a hunch that i may know who to target for today's lynch, but i need to confirm it first.
1. I did not, check again.In post 10, Billy Pilgrim wrote:So why are you skipping RVS this game? Because it looked like you participated in it last time. Also, how do you possibly have a Lynch target four posts in?In post 9, Farkran wrote:Hello everyone.
I hate RVS, so i'm going to entirely skip that phase. Allow me to introduce myself:
I am Farkran, this is my second game in this site, but i have been playing FMs a long time ago elsewhere. Last game i was a mason.
Misc info:
- i am from italy, native language italian, i'm active most of the day but i will be sleeping during CEST nighttime.
- my meta is to talk a lot and getting others to talk. I attention-whore the game hard and usually die very early. I do this both as town and scum.
- i have a hunch that i may know who to target for today's lynch, but i need to confirm it first.
And if you do, why aren't you voting it? Also, if you die early as town is it due to mis-lynching or being NK'd?
VOTE: Farkran
Wow, interesting entrance and hello to you. Any input beyond being mad that Farkran gave more information than she needed to?In post 11, Randbo wrote:Who give a sht about your affiliation last game?
I can't wait to see what you are talking about in 2. I also can't possibly imagine what you would need confirmed. When do you plan on being able to let us know whether you got the confirmation you need.In post 12, Farkran wrote:
1. I did not, check again.
2. I need to confirm something first, then i will be happy to do so.
3. Both, actually. Last time i was n1ked for being active and unpredictable. In my past games (role names may vary) i have been n1ked by a vigilante as a jester, n1ked by mafia as a mason (that time they did NOT know i was a mason, though) and mislynched d1 or d2 fairly often - including that one time when i was targeted by the mafia Framer and investigated by the town Cop - guess what, i drew attention from both sides. In my past scum games, i managed to stay alive a bit longer because i was safe from nks and i consider myself a fairly good PR sniper.
This is a straw argument if I've ever seen one. You're suggesting that my position is to only look at meta, which isn't what I said. What I am saying is that meta is a component of making reads. For instance, I noticed that in the previous game, Farkran didn't make the grand introduction that she did this game. So I've been probing at that.In post 17, Randbo wrote:That is cancerous.
Let's say I developed a "scummy" game style. Yet I kept on flipping town. A reputation is attached to me. Now finally I landed a scum role. But since my playstyle is scummy, in your eyes (from your description) that is the way I play as town.
Would like her to answer my question first, but I promise I have some thoughts on her. You, not so much at the moment.In post 19, Randbo wrote:My strawman argument is the reason y. Reason that I seen used many time in many games. People defended behaviors with "that is just the way they are". Patterns. Human being does love patterns.
Now my turn: so now that Farkran had a massive introduction, Which as a town she haven't done before. What is in your mind while probing through her post?
I will tell you as soon as i know. Currently, i don't have the necessary elements to confirm my theory, and it would be detrimental to speak about it beforehand. Most likely tomorrow (almost sleeptime here).In post 16, Billy Pilgrim wrote:I can't wait to see what you are talking about in 2. I also can't possibly imagine what you would need confirmed. When do you plan on being able to let us know whether you got the confirmation you need.In post 12, Farkran wrote:
1. I did not, check again.
2. I need to confirm something first, then i will be happy to do so.
3. Both, actually. Last time i was n1ked for being active and unpredictable. In my past games (role names may vary) i have been n1ked by a vigilante as a jester, n1ked by mafia as a mason (that time they did NOT know i was a mason, though) and mislynched d1 or d2 fairly often - including that one time when i was targeted by the mafia Framer and investigated by the town Cop - guess what, i drew attention from both sides. In my past scum games, i managed to stay alive a bit longer because i was safe from nks and i consider myself a fairly good PR sniper.
Also, why did you communicate to us that you die early often?
Pedit: I'm a lawyer, so I may be a psychopath. I haven't taken the Hare yet.
And knowing she has a towngame on site means I can go check it to see if her play in general lines up with how she played that game. Not saying it's perfect, but it's better than acting like previous games don't matter.
In post 12, Farkran wrote:2. I need to confirm something first, then i will be happy to do so.
If it's detrimental to speak about this read until you've confirmed it, I can't help but wonder why you lead off the game by speaking about it? It reads as being unnaturally eager to say something meaningful for the sake of looking helpful.In post 21, Farkran wrote:I will tell you as soon as i know. Currently, i don't have the necessary elements to confirm my theory, and it would be detrimental to speak about it beforehand. Most likely tomorrow (almost sleeptime here).
I apologize for misgendering you. I saw the female avatar and the picture primed my brain. I'll fix it now.In post 21, Farkran wrote:I will tell you as soon as i know. Currently, i don't have the necessary elements to confirm my theory, and it would be detrimental to speak about it beforehand. Most likely tomorrow (almost sleeptime here).In post 16, Billy Pilgrim wrote:I can't wait to see what you are talking about in 2. I also can't possibly imagine what you would need confirmed. When do you plan on being able to let us know whether you got the confirmation you need.In post 12, Farkran wrote:
1. I did not, check again.
2. I need to confirm something first, then i will be happy to do so.
3. Both, actually. Last time i was n1ked for being active and unpredictable. In my past games (role names may vary) i have been n1ked by a vigilante as a jester, n1ked by mafia as a mason (that time they did NOT know i was a mason, though) and mislynched d1 or d2 fairly often - including that one time when i was targeted by the mafia Framer and investigated by the town Cop - guess what, i drew attention from both sides. In my past scum games, i managed to stay alive a bit longer because i was safe from nks and i consider myself a fairly good PR sniper.
Also, why did you communicate to us that you die early often?
Pedit: I'm a lawyer, so I may be a psychopath. I haven't taken the Hare yet.
And knowing she has a towngame on site means I can go check it to see if her play in general lines up with how she played that game. Not saying it's perfect, but it's better than acting like previous games don't matter.
As for my grand meta-ish introduction, last game i learned the hard way that metareading is a strong thing in this site. I used to play anon, but it's not a custom here, so i had to adapt even though i don't like to meta-analyze.
Counter-question: i have my reasons to hold back on my hunch, but what are yours for not providing your thoughts about me?
(out of game: i have a female avatar but i'm actually a guy, see the "he" in my Pronoun slot)