Nah you also agreed with poking the worst to make him actually do stuff, and our reads lists earlier were pretty close iirc.In post 2194, skitter30 wrote:This is like the first thing that you've said that i've agreed with all game i think
Better question: Why would we lynch NSG when there's a very good chance that scum (either SK or groupscum) does it for us on the grounds that it's NSG?In post 2202, Almost50 wrote:I can vote teacher, but WHEN do we lynch NSG??
I haven't played with NSG for a year (more or less), and I only remember she lurks hard as scum.In post 2203, Nibbui wrote:A50, are you trying to distract from the teacher wagon (i don't remember you talking much about the convo unless for puns) or are you not used to NSG's changed meta?
I dont like that you like the firepuppy lynchIn post 2207, Bingle wrote:Nah you also agreed with poking the worst to make him actually do stuff, and our reads lists earlier were pretty close iirc.In post 2194, skitter30 wrote:This is like the first thing that you've said that i've agreed with all game i think
What's the case on teach beyond "He's focusing on minutia?" Cause I'm still jiving on a firepuppy lynch and I'm not sure why it fell apart.
You were never on the firepuppy lynch, so you not liking it isn't why it fell apart.In post 2211, skitter30 wrote:I dont like that you like the firepuppy lynchIn post 2207, Bingle wrote:Nah you also agreed with poking the worst to make him actually do stuff, and our reads lists earlier were pretty close iirc.In post 2194, skitter30 wrote:This is like the first thing that you've said that i've agreed with all game i think
What's the case on teach beyond "He's focusing on minutia?" Cause I'm still jiving on a firepuppy lynch and I'm not sure why it fell apart.
I feel like teacher's using these grammmatical arguments etc to engage with the thread without providing real content
l3, Nibs NB You DDLIn post 2212, skitter30 wrote:I think teacher is l2 btw
My question, really, is what changed between this point and now, and why?In post 1625, nomnomnom wrote:Egix96 (5): Almost50, DrDolittle, NorwegianboyEE, Nibbui, Bingle
You mean this, right before she said she didn't actually read before replacing in?In post 1804, northsidegal wrote:well i recently finished a game with egix where we were scumpartners (and i played pretty terribly) and i remember that one of his problems there was his reticence to take any sort of strong stance. that was one of the first things that i looked at in his ISO when i skimmed before, and it felt like he was definitely making reads pretty freely.
This, ftr, is the only taking stances I see from Egix, and it's also the most questionable post he's made.In post 360, Egix96 wrote:Oh wow, this is virtually the same as what I thought of it.In post 241, skitter30 wrote:it actually did feel tvt to me
but if i'm wrong i think nibbui was more likely to be scum in that exchange
but i didnt read it as tvs actually
Skitter town.
Depends on how I approach you. I'm receiving wildly mixed signals. If I try to read your behavior, you're crazy scummy. If I try to read the thread around you and impacts, you're likely town. I haven't decided which is more accurate to your alignment.In post 2222, skitter30 wrote:Oh do explain why i'm on there twice
Jingle i think you pushing for egix is atrocious btw