Open 769: Venrob's PYP X/Y (Town Wins)

Billy Pilgrim · Post Post #325 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:09 am

In post 323, nomnomnom wrote:Oh you mean post 99. That comes after me stating that the discussion flies over my head to try and get on board with the discussion. What's strange about that?

That contribution seemed solid though. It seemed right in line with what was being discussed, so I dont understand why you acted like it was over your head, because it seems like it definitely wasnt.

Billy Pilgrim · Post Post #326 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:12 am

@Skitt - my bad, just re-read my posts and saw it. I think work broke my brain on Friday.

AaronFrost · Post Post #327 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2019 8:41 am

In post 321, Billy Pilgrim wrote:@Aaron - in Haunted, the setup spec was almost entirely led by scum. The primary contributors from my memory were Vork and NaCl. The people that were trying to end it were all town.

My issue with Xayah isn't that she was trying to stop setup spec. My issue was the inconsistency between 110 (SS is obvscum because setup spec) and 307 (why is SS obvscum to you people?) followed by the vote someone who had little participation in it. How did we get from point A to point B?

Could the players doing setup spec be scum? Sure, but I'm not willing to lynch someone just because of that.

Billy Pilgrim · Post Post #328 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2019 10:28 am

@Aaron, the above was in response to your 187.

rb · Post Post #329 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2019 10:44 am

oh it finally opened

hi, backreading

rb · Post Post #330 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2019 10:49 am

SS is playing with more activity than i've ever seen him play

idk what that means for his alignment tho

rb · Post Post #331 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2019 10:49 am

Billy seems town

rb · Post Post #332 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2019 10:52 am

i dont like suji's early play for the most part, and i like that skitter voted them for their roundabout play. not convinced suji is scummy for it (wouldnt it be great if being vague meant scummy?) but i like skitters preparedness to go for it

flubber is playing well, but doesn't strike me as particularly town

everyone else is blending into my head atm
as for the draft, i had no idea what i was doing so i picked 69 because LMAO SEX NUMBER

rb · Post Post #333 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2019 10:55 am

VOTE: AaronFrost

looked at both leading wagons, i think this is a better vote

mechanics focussed, own reasons for voting are poor and reek of wanting to be inconscpicuous rather than voting where they truly believe is most likely to hit scum

rb · Post Post #334 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2019 11:17 am

skitter town, skitter wagon bad

rb · Post Post #335 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2019 11:19 am

In post 327, AaronFrost wrote:
In post 321, Billy Pilgrim wrote:@Aaron - in Haunted, the setup spec was almost entirely led by scum. The primary contributors from my memory were Vork and NaCl. The people that were trying to end it were all town.
My issue with Xayah isn't that she was trying to stop setup spec. My issue was the inconsistency between 110 (SS is obvscum because setup spec) and 307 (why is SS obvscum to you people?) followed by the vote someone who had little participation in it. How did we get from point A to point B?

Could the players doing setup spec be scum? Sure, but I'm not willing to lynch someone just because of that.

id be willing to lynch SS just for that, but i think you're a better lynch (=

rb · Post Post #336 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2019 11:25 am

I want luca to be scum because then this game would be ez solve

do something scummy imo

rb · Post Post #337 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2019 11:26 am

actually need to check something on skitter

rb · Post Post #338 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2019 11:27 am

why are you so paranoid about nom being scum and then park your vote on Billy?

=|

rb · Post Post #339 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2019 11:30 am

I think Luca is entirely wrong about most of their reads

i am bothered

ISO · Post Post #340 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2019 11:41 am

In post 330, rb wrote:SS is playing with more activity than i've ever seen him play

idk what that means for his alignment tho

Nothing. It means I have more free time now

Sirfetchd · Post Post #341 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2019 2:00 pm

Rb got solid reads, cool beans.

Don't think Woop's lack of activity is indicative of anything, want to know why you're specifically keen on kerset though, as it's basically been noise for me so far.

Note to self for later. Activity stats show highest posters have among the most little to say, might be worth coming back to because that seems weird. This day could use a wagon.

Vote: Aaron

They followed my mini 1v1 with a townread on me, potential soft buddy to avoid stirring me as an unknown quantity which is enough to jump on a wagon.

Kerset · Post Post #342 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2019 3:19 pm

In post 318, Xayah wrote:
In post 313, Kerset wrote:
In post 306, Xayah wrote:[
How do you get this at all? No one is going to get ‘scared away’ from talking about something from a vote. That’s not how people work. (...) What I am ‘offering’ is a vote on why someone is scum.
Sure why would he stop doing this. You only called him a potential scum. No one would bother to avoid scummy behavior in this game.
So you agree with me that your question/response to me was basically pointless? Well, that was easier than I expected.

Nope, it was irony

Kerset · Post Post #343 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2019 3:35 pm

In post 329, rb wrote:oh it finally opened

hi, backreading

Finnaly opened? We started this day after role pick.
You are so luckly to notice this few hours before your prod time.

rb · Post Post #344 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2019 3:50 pm

In post 343, Kerset wrote:
In post 329, rb wrote:oh it finally opened

hi, backreading
Finnaly opened? We started this day after role pick.
You are so luckly to notice this few hours before your prod time.

please go on

rb · Post Post #345 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2019 4:07 pm

you know, i think kerset is pretty likely to be scum here

because it's like a soft accusation that i'm scum, but never actually says it. it's like, "haha oh yeah sure, you "forgot" - the natural follow-up would be to then say why they think i'm lying? or think i'm scum?

also: their only focus on all the content i've provided so far is not any of the opinions i've had about the game, but literally just the post in which i said, "i'm backreading"

this doesn't scan to me as town, whether new player or not.

VOTE: kerset

rb · Post Post #346 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2019 4:09 pm

also most of their posts is just weak setup speculation

then an announcement that, "hey town seems clueless" - with zero attempt to actually provide a clue or direction

scummy as heck imo. complaining about a town performing poorly, without providing content to improve town's state of play is what scum do to look like they're frustrated town. but they really don't look that way at all to me

Wooper · Post Post #347 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2019 4:10 pm

In post 330, rb wrote:SS is playing with more activity than i've ever seen him play

idk what that means for his alignment tho

he gets nervous as scum
not a locktown but it's town indicative

rb · Post Post #348 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2019 4:11 pm

i'm gonna call it NAI because that seems most accurate but yeah that's my feeling as well

Wooper · Post Post #349 (ISO) » Sat Oct 26, 2019 4:12 pm

In post 340, Something_Smart wrote:
In post 330, rb wrote:SS is playing with more activity than i've ever seen him play

idk what that means for his alignment tho
Nothing. It means I have more free time now

oh valid
towny response ig

In post 341, Sirfetchd wrote:Don't think Woop's lack of activity is indicative of anything, want to know why you're specifically keen on kerset though, as it's basically been noise for me so far.

it works interesting angles and has good intuition, i want to see where it's going

VOTE: aaron sheep as promised

hi rb, i'm your 7th biggest fan